Of
course, you could stop doing business with California…
Half
of companies missed GDPR deadline, 70% admit systems won’t scale
Even
if given two years notice to achieve
GDPR compliance,
only half of companies self-reported as compliant by May 25, 2018, a
DataGrail survey reveals.
“The
Age of Privacy: The Cost of Continuous Compliance” report
benchmarks the operational impact of the European General Data
Protection Regulation (GDPR
)
and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA
),
as well as sharing insights into lessons learned and attitudes toward
privacy regulations.
… “Businesses
without a European presence were not impacted by the GDPR. However,
with the CCPA fast approaching, US businesses without GDPR are
experiencing the same challenges that multinational companies did
with GDPR,” said Daniel Barber, Co-founder & CEO, DataGrail.
“Most
companies reported taking at least seven months to achieve GDPR
readiness, but now with CCPA only seven months away, they
realize their systems will not support CCPA and other forthcoming
privacy regulations. Companies will need to integrate and
operationalize their privacy management to avoid the time-consuming
and error-prone manual processes to comply with these regulations.”
(Related)
Prince
Harry won a legal battle with the paparazzi using Europe's GDPR
privacy law — and it gives the royals a powerful new weapon against
the media
Prince Harry this week notched another victory in
the royal family's long-running battle with paparazzi photographers,
securing a "substantial payout" from an agency which used a
helicopter to take pictures inside a house he was renting.
Potentially even more interesting than that is the
way in which he won his battle — basing a legal case partly on a
sweeping new European data law that is less than a year old.
According to a statement delivered to London's
High Court on Thursday, in which the paparazzi agency Splash News
apologized to Harry, also known as the Duke of Sussex (emphasis
ours):
"This matter concerns a claim for misuse of private information, breaches of The Duke's right to privacy under Article 8 ECHR and breaches of the General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") and Data Protection Act 2018 ("DPA")."
… pursuing
photographers on the grounds that their business constitutes illegal
data processing is a new strategy, and a use of GDPR that few would
have predicted.
… But,
at least according to the thrust of Harry's legal argument, a
photograph can be personal data too — even one of your home which
you are not even in. One concern may have been that the photographs
gave away Harry's address.
… Once
you accept that the pictures Splash took count as Harry's personal
data, they have a whole host of obligations.
… Timothy
Pinto, a senior counsel for the law firm Taylor Wessing, wrote
an article about GDPR in media law,
which said that it offers a potentially attractive alternative to
claims of defamation of invasion of privacy.
What
if your AI thinks you’re crazy? (Can you own an AI? Does the 13th
Amendment apply?)
Your
Robot Therapist Will See You Now: Ethical Implications of Embodied
Artificial Intelligence in Psychiatry, Psychology, and Psychotherapy
… This
paper assesses the ethical and social implications of translating
embodied AI applications into mental health care across the fields of
Psychiatry, Psychology and Psychotherapy. Building on this analysis,
Questions,
always more questions.
The
intrinsically linked future for human and Artificial Intelligence
interaction
… Security
and regulations have to be put in place, with questions of “Who is
responsible for AI security and regulations”? and “can AI be
trusted as an autonomous entity” also the ethical use of AI has to
be addressed, “What about the rights and ethics of AI”?. The
human race is on an inevitable path of AI dominance the question is
“will humans and AI be friends or adversaries”?
No comments:
Post a Comment