If you lost drives containing
evidence or other confidential data would you be able to have Western
Digital “fix” your disks? (Paranoid me asks: Would this ‘hack’
be a model for a company that wanted to force customers to upgrade?)
https://www.databreaches.net/western-digital-to-provide-recovery-services-for-hacked-nas-drives/
Western
Digital to provide recovery services for hacked NAS drives
Western
Digital has announced a new trade-in programme to help customers
mitigate the effects of a mass malware attack that saw terabytes of
data wiped from users’ NAS drives overnight.
Those
who lost data as a result of the hack will be able to benefit from
Western Digital’s data recovery services, as well as a trade-in
programme for My Book Live network-attached storage devices that were
targeted in the attack. Customers partaking in the programme will be
able to upgrade to a new supported My Cloud device.
Both
programmes will become available starting July, the company stated.
Read
more on TechCentral.ie
Exceptional?
https://www.pogowasright.org/u-s-supreme-court-turns-away-digital-device-border-search-cases/
U.S.
Supreme Court turns away digital device border search cases
Sara
Merken reports:
The
U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined
to
take up three cases that relate to constitutional requirements for
U.S. border searches of electronic devices like laptops and cell
phones.
The high court’s decision to steer
clear of the cases comes as courts around the country have grappled
in varying ways with how the 4th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution
applies in the digital age.
In
one of the cases, the American Civil Liberties Union and the
Electronic Frontier Foundation asked
the
justices to review a 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision in
which a three-judge panel ruled
in
February that U.S. border agents don’t need warrants to search
travelers’ smartphones and laptops at airports and other U.S. ports
of entry.
Read
more on Reuters.
(Related)
https://www.pogowasright.org/wisconsin-supreme-court-refuses-to-limit-warrantless-forensic-searches-of-cell-phones/
Wisconsin
Supreme Court Refuses to Limit Warrantless Forensic Searches of Cell
Phones
From
EPIC.org:
The
Wisconsin Supreme Court issued an opinion
in
Wisconsin
v. Burch finding
that cell phone data downloaded with a forensic
device can
be used in a subsequent, unrelated investigation and trial regardless
of whether the data was initially obtained without a warrant in
violation of the Fourth Amendment. A police department used a
forensic device to download the entire contents of the defendant’s
phone while investigating a hit-and-run and retained a full copy
indefinitely. The sheriff’s office later accessed and searched the
copy during an unrelated homicide investigation and used the
defendant’s cell phone data as evidence during his trial. The
Wisconsin Supreme Court refused to decide the constitutional
question. Instead, the Court found that the evidence should not be
excluded because the police “acted by the book” and there was no
conduct to deter with exclusion. The Court said that the sheriff’s
office “ha[d] every reason to think [the downloaded data] was
lawfully obtained” and found there was no police misconduct because
it is “common police practice to share records with other
agencies.” Dissenting from this holding, Judge Bradley, along with
two other justices of the court, recognized that law enforcement
“generally needs a warrant to search the data [cell phones] hold.”
She added that the exclusionary rule should apply in this case
because “excluding evidence obtained by following such an unlawful
and widespread policy provides significant societal value by both
specifically deterring continued adherence to an unconstitutional
practice and more broadly incentivizing police agencies to adopt
policies in line with the Fourth Amendment.” EPIC, along with the
ACLU and EFF, filed an amicus
brief in
the case that argued that the unchecked use of forensic devices to
download, store, and share cell data violated the Fourth Amendment by
“enabl[ing] the State to rummage at will among a person’s most
personal and private information whenever it wanted, for as long as
it wanted” without a warrant. EPIC regularly files amicus
briefs challenging
unlawful
access
to
cell
phone data.
A
teaching aide?
https://www.bespacific.com/the-overlapping-infrastructure-of-urban-surveillance-and-how-to-fix-it/
The
Overlapping Infrastructure of Urban Surveillance and How to Fix It
EFF
Free Visual – The Overlapping Infrastructure of Urban Surveillance,
and How to Fix It –
“Between
the increasing
capabilities of
local and state police, the creep of federal
law enforcement into
domestic policing, the use of aerial surveillance such as spy
planes and
drones,
and mounting
cooperation between
private technology companies and the government, it can be hard to
understand and visualize what all this overlapping surveillance can
mean for your daily life. We often think of these problems as siloed
issues. Local police deploy automated license plate readers or
acoustic gunshot detection. Federal authorities monitor you when you
travel internationally. But if you could take a cross-section of the
average city block, you would see the ways that the built environment
of surveillance—its physical presence in, over, and under our
cities—makes this an entwined problem that must be combatted
through entwined solutions. Thus, we decided to create a graphic to
show how—from overhead to underground—these technologies and
legal authorities overlap, how they disproportionately impact the
lives of marginalized communities, and the tools we have at our
disposal to halt or mitigate their harms…”
(Related)
https://www.pogowasright.org/maine-law-restricts-facial-recognition-technology-statewide/
Maine
law restricts facial recognition technology statewide
AP
reports:
A bill touted as the country’s
strictest statewide regulation on the use of facial recognition
technology has become law in Maine.
While several states regulate facial
recognition as a surveillance tool, the Maine law represents a broad
prohibition of the technology at the state, county and municipal
government levels, with limited exceptions for law enforcement
purposes, officials said.
Read
more on AP
News.
Related:
L.D.
1585
Looks
to be a bit too expensive for the average guy. Perhaps there is a
market for cheaper tools?
https://www.makeuseof.com/tag/8-ways-prevent-drones-infringing-privacy/
How
to Prevent Drones Infringing on Your Privacy: 7 Ways
For
your viewing pleasure?
https://www.pogowasright.org/funniest-privacy-videos-privacy-at-law-schools/
Funniest
Privacy Videos + Privacy at Law Schools
Law
professor Daniel Solove writes:
At
my event, the Privacy
Law Salon,
we have a wonderful tradition of showing some of the year’s
funniest privacy videos after dinner. I thought I’d share some of
the videos
I
have enjoyed the most, plus some new ones I recently found.
When
you want to be amazed and depressed at the same time.
https://www.makeuseof.com/tag/download-entire-facebook-history-data-downloader/
How
to Download Your Entire Facebook History
… a
look at how to download your Facebook data, what's included, and,
perhaps most importantly, what's not included.
Once
again I am pleased to see none of my students on this list.
https://www.databreaches.net/us-secret-service-brings-back-its-cyber-most-wanted-list/
US
Secret Service brings back its Cyber Most Wanted list
Catalin
Cimpanu reports:
The
US Secret Service has updated its official website this month to add
a new page where the agency is now listing the most sought-after
fugitives involved in financially related cybercrime investigations.
The
new Most
Wanted Fugitives page
was re-added to the agency’s site after the page had been removed
from the site for the past few years.
The
agency’s most wanted fugitives page is very similar to the FBI’s
Cyber Most Wanted,
with some names found on both lists.
Read
more on The
Record.
This is what
passes for ethics today?
https://venturebeat.com/2021/07/01/nice-publishes-ethical-framework-for-applying-ai-to-customer-service/
Nice
publishes ethical framework for applying AI to customer service
Nice,
a provider of a robotic process automation (RPA) platform infused
with machine learning algorithms employed in call centers, today
published a Robo
Ethical Framework for employing AI to better serve customers.
The
goal is to provide some direction on how best to employ robots
alongside humans in a call center, rather than focusing on how to
replace humans, said Oded Karev, vice president of RPA for Nice.
The
field is probably not fracturing, but new buzzwords appear whenever
people think they are inventing a new specialization. Or perhaps
it’s just marketing.
https://searchenterpriseai.techtarget.com/tip/9-top-AI-and-machine-learning-trends
9
top AI and machine learning trends for 2021
Tiny
ML, multi-modal learning, responsible AI -- learn about the top
trends in AI for 2021 and how they promise to transform how business
gets done.
Redefining
antitrust.
https://www.wired.com/story/ftc-antitrust-case-against-facebook-very-much-alive/
Actually,
the Antitrust Case Against Facebook Is Very Much Alive
YOU
MAY HAVE heard about how the government’s effort to break up
Facebook was dealt a death blow by a federal judge on Monday. Per
The
New York Times,
the case was “thrown out,” in a “stunning setback.” As The
Washington Post put
it, the ruling “handed Facebook a major victory.” One Wall
Street Journal reporter
summed up the mood by noting on Twitter, “Hard to overstate the
blow Facebook landed here.”
But
according to several antitrust experts I’ve spoken with,
overstatement is precisely the way to describe these news reports.
Yes, Monday was a good day for Facebook, whose market cap briefly
cracked $1 trillion on the strength of the news. The company had
been facing parallel cases filed in December: one by the Federal
Trade Commission, the other by a coalition of 46 states, plus Guam
and the District of Columbia. On Monday, Judge James E. Boasberg
dismissed
the states’ case in its entirety,
primarily because he found they had waited too long to bring it.
That’s a big deal. But, for weird legal reasons that we won’t
get into, the timing problem doesn’t apply to the federal
government. And so the heart of the FTC’s legal effort—which
seeks to force Facebook to sell off Instagram and WhatsApp—is still
very much alive. It wasn’t thrown out, it was just sent back to
the kitchen. Boasberg has given
the FTC,
under newly appointed chair Lina Khan, 30 days to beef up the parts
of its complaint that he found lacking in evidence. Assuming it
chooses to refile the case, there’s good reason to think the agency
will be able to meet the challenge.
(Related)
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-06-30/amazon-seeks-to-have-ftc-chair-khan-recused-on-company-actions
Amazon
Wants FTC Chair Khan Recused Over Past Criticism
Amazon.com
Inc. wants
Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan recused from matters
involving the company because of her history criticizing the online
retailer as a threat to competition.
Amazon
filed
a
request with the agency on Wednesday, arguing that Khan should be
barred from handling antitrust enforcement decisions affecting the
company, according to documents obtained by Bloomberg News.
(Related) I
have to keep reminding myself that monopoly not only means
controlling the majority of a market but without a majority having
the ability to influence the market. Where I really get confused is
how one fifth of 46% constitutes undue influence on the market.
https://www.pressgazette.co.uk/global-advertising-spend-2020-quintopoly/
Quintopoly?
Five tech companies now earn 46% of global ad revenues as news media
left behind
Google,
Facebook, Alibaba, TikTok owner Bytedance and Amazon generated ad
sales of $296bn last year – making up 46% of the market.
Apparently
there is big money in the ‘replace lawyers with software”
business.
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/30/legalzoom-debuted-up-30percent-ceo-sells-further-push-into-digital-market.html
LegalZoom
shares jump 35% in market debut; CEO sees further opportunity in
online legal services
… The
online legal platform was valued
at over $7.5 billion as shares soared as much as 38%.
Perspective.
Is Jonathon overreacting? Is the loss of information on the
Internet disproportionately greater than other systems?
https://www.bespacific.com/the-internet-is-rotting/
The
Internet Is Rotting
The
Atlantic – Too
much has been lost already. The glue that holds humanity’s
knowledge together is coming undone.
By Jonathan
Zittrain –
“This absence of central control, or even easy central monitoring,
has long been celebrated as an instrument of grassroots democracy and
freedom. It’s
not trivial to censor a network as organic and decentralized as the
internet.
But more recently, these features have been understood to facilitate
vectors for individual harassment and societal destabilization, with
no easy gating points through which to remove or label malicious work
not under the umbrellas of the major social-media platforms, or to
quickly identify their sources. While both assessments have power to
them, they each gloss over a key feature of the distributed web and
internet: Their designs naturally create gaps of responsibility for
maintaining valuable content that others rely on. Links work
seamlessly until they don’t. And as tangible counterparts to
online work fade, these gaps represent actual holes in humanity’s
knowledge…
It
turns out that link rot and content drift are endemic
to the web,
which is both unsurprising and shockingly risky for a library that
has “billions of books and no central filing system.” Imagine if
libraries didn’t exist and there was only a “sharing economy”
for physical books: People could register what books they happened to
have at home, and then others who wanted them could visit and peruse
them. It’s no surprise that such a system could fall out of date,
with books no longer where they were advertised to be—especially if
someone reported a book being in someone else’s home in 2015, and
then an interested reader saw that 2015 report in 2021 and tried to
visit the original home mentioned as holding it. That’s what we
have right now on the web….”