The process is simple, why wouldn’t more
companies use it?
Facebook
confesses: Buckle up, there's plenty more privacy lapses where that
came from
Facebook has confirmed what many of us have known
for years: Cambridge Analytica was far from the only organization
engaging in the wholesale hoarding of netizens' personal data via the
social network.
The Silicon Valley giant told America's financial
watchdog, the SEC, on Thursday that it will probably reveal
additional data-harvesting operations as it continues probing how
outside developers accessed its website and what information they
siphoned off in bulk.
… Now after years of letting companies chug
from its firehose, Facebook is shocked – shocked
– to discover that shady outfits were amassing folks' info via
these APIs.
Soon, mandatory for all citizens (and visitors)?
How private
is your DNA on ancestry websites? East Area Rapist case raises
questions
… A partial DNA match with an unidentified
relative of Joseph James DeAngelo on a genealogy website led to
DeAngelo’s arrest as the suspect in the notorious East Area Rapist
case, the Sacramento County District Attorney’s Office said
Thursday.
Investigators recently found a “familial DNA
match” to a sample collected years ago at a crime scene linked to
the East Area Rapist. The family link then led the Sheriff’s
Department to DeAngelo’s home on a quiet middle-class street in
Citrus Heights, where they
obtained a direct DNA sample from him after following
him and picking up an unidentified object he discarded,
according to Sheriff Scott Jones.
When that sample came back as a hit for a series
of crimes, DeAngelo was arrested.
Sacramento County District Attorney Anne Marie
Schubert declined to detail
how her office obtained the relative’s DNA profile or accessed a
genealogy database, raising questions about the privacy of
personal genetic information on websites.
“I haven’t come across this before,” said
John Roman, a senior fellow at research organization NORC at the
University of Chicago. Roman is a forensics expert and studied the
use of DNA in criminal investigation in 2005-09 in Orange County and
L.A.
“If that’s how the match was obtained, then I
would think there would be court battles to come.”
Colleen Fitzpatrick and Margaret Press, who run a
nonprofit organization called the DNA Doe Project, said one of
DeAngelo’s relatives may have shared DNA results with one of
several public DNA matching websites, where people upload genetic
data in search of biological parents or other long-lost relatives
after obtaining results from a commercial site.
The Sheriff’s Department then could have gone to
one of those sites, loaded DNA information from East Area Rapist
crime scenes and found partial matches.
… California became the first state to
authorize such familial line testing in 2008, but it has strict
limits. Searches can be requested only when law enforcement has a
suspect, and the DNA is only tested against databases containing
samples from people arrested or convicted of felonies.
The FBI maintains that system, but each state
manages its own DNA database. In California, it’s maintained by
the California Bureau of Investigation.
(Related)
Police Used
Free Genealogy Database To Track Golden State Killer Suspect
… Paul Holes, a recently retired investigator
with California’s Contra Costa County District Attorney’s Office,
said he took crime-scene DNA — believed to be that of the culprit —
and entered the profile into the online Florida-based GEDmatch
database.
… Holes said that when he entered the
crime-scene DNA profile, more than 100 users matched as a distant
relative, possibly as close as a third cousin. To use GEDmatch,
users agree to make their information public and attach at least an
email address to their profile.
(Related)
Cops
hunting the Golden State Killer got the WRONG MAN by using a free
genealogy site and ordered innocent sickly 73-year-old to give DNA to
clear himself - then his daughter helped nail 'real killer'
Investigators
hunting the Golden State Killer used DNA information from a genealogy
website to identify a sickly 73-year-old as their prime suspect, and
then a
judge ordered him to undergo a test to prove he was not the serial
murderer and rapist.
Cops used a genetic profile based on DNA from
crime scenes and compared it to 189,000 others uploaded by family
tree enthusiasts on free site YSearch.org
to track down the care home resident, who also shared a rare genetic
marker with the killer.
…
Eventually, police used the same technique on a different genealogy
website to track down who they believe to be the real Golden State
Killer: 73-year-old former police officer Joseph DeAngelo, who
has now been charged with eight counts of murder.
…
Although many will celebrate the use of Internet DNA databases to
identify DeAngelo, the fact that police wrongly identified an early
suspect will worry campaigners who fear the approach jeopardizes
privacy rights.
Steve Mercer, chief attorney for the forensic
division of the Maryland Office of the Public Defender, said privacy
laws are not strong enough to keep police from accessing ancestry
sites, which have fewer
protections than databases which hold the DNA of convicts.
…
While people may not realize police can use public genealogy
websites to solve crimes, it is probably legal, said Erin Murphy, a
DNA expert and professor at New York University School of Law.
'It
seems crazy to say a police officer investigating a very serious
crime can't do something your cousin can do,' Murphy said.
'If an ordinary person can do this, why can't a cop? On the other
hand, if an ordinary person had done this, we might think they
shouldn't.'