The
Privacy Foundation ( https://www.law.du.edu/privacy-foundation
) has posted details of their November 12th
Seminar: Privacy-HIPAA/Foundational
Principles—Current and Future Trends
Is
the result similar to a police patrol or something more sinister.
Look for yourself.
https://www.wired.com/story/ddosecrets-police-helicopter-data-leak/
1.8
TB of Police Helicopter Surveillance Footage Leaks Online
LAW
ENFORCEMENT USE of
surveillance
drones has proliferated across
the United States in recent years, sparking backlash from privacy
advocates. But newly leaked aerial surveillance footage from the
Dallas Police Department in Texas and what appears to be Georgia's
State Patrol underscore the breadth and sophistication of footage
captured by another type of aerial police vehicle: helicopters.
The
transparency activist group Distributed Denial of Secrets, or
DDoSecrets, posted a 1.8-terabyte trove of police helicopter footage
to its website on Friday. DDoSecrets cofounder Emma Best says that
her group doesn’t know the identity of the source who shared the
data and that no affiliation or motivation for leaking the files was
given. The source simply
said that the two police departments were storing the data in
unsecured cloud infrastructure.
DDoSecrets
gained notoriety in June 2020 when it published a massive
leak of law enforcement data stolen
by a hacker associated with Anonymous. The data, dubbed BlueLeaks,
included emails, audio, video, and intelligence documents from more
than 200 state, local, and federal agencies around the US. The
release got DDoSecrets banned from Twitter, and Reddit banned the
r/blueleaks subreddit. The group, which essentially sees itself as a
successor
to Wikileaks,
has also courted controversy by publishing leaks of sensitive data
taken
from the far-right platform Gab and
a trove stolen
in a ransomware attack on
a gas pipeline services firm.
Download
here: https://ddosecrets.com/wiki/Aerial_Surveillance_Footage
(Related)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.00992#
Artificial
Intelligence, Surveillance, and Big Data
The
most important resource to improve technologies in the field of
artificial intelligence is data. Two types of policies are crucial
in this respect: privacy and data-sharing regulations, and the use of
surveillance technologies for policing. Both types of policies vary
substantially across countries and political regimes. In this
chapter, we examine how authoritarian and democratic political
institutions can influence the quality of research in artificial
intelligence, and the availability of large-scale datasets to improve
and train deep learning algorithms. We focus mainly on the Chinese
case, and find that -- ceteris paribus -- authoritarian political
institutions continue to have a negative effect on innovation They
can, however, have a positive effect on research in deep learning,
via the availability of large-scale datasets that have been obtained
through government surveillance. We propose a research agenda to
study which of the two effects might dominate in a race for
leadership in artificial intelligence between countries with
different political institutions, such as the United States and
China.
The
original “Big Data” gatherers would naturally find AI beneficial.
https://governmentciomedia.com/ai-helping-refine-intelligence-analysis
AI
Helping to Refine Intelligence Analysis
Speaking
at the GovernmentCIO Media & Research AI:
National Security virtual event,
Director of the National Security Agency (NSA) Research Directorate
Mark Segal discussed how these new capacities are assisting
intelligence analysts in better processing and sorting large
quantities of often complex and disparate information.
In
outlining the NSA’s research priorities, Segal noted that both AI
and machine-learning capacities already showed promise for better
organizing the large pools of variable data their analysts sort
through in producing regular assessments.
“One
of the challenges that we have found AI to be particularly useful for
is looking through the sheer amount of data that's created every day
on this planet. Our analysts are looking at some of this data trying
to understand it, and understand what its implications are for
national security. The amount of data that we have to sort is going
up pretty dramatically, but the number of people that we have who are
actually looking at this data is pretty constant. So we're
constantly looking for tools and technologies to help our analysts
more effectively go through huge piles of data,” Segal said.
… “Imagine
you've got a very large pile of documents, and in some of these
documents there are really important things you want analysts to look
at while some of the other documents are completely irrelevant. So
one of the ways that we've used AI and machine learning in particular
is we can have a trained human look at a subset of these documents
and train a model to say which ones are really important and which
ones are less important. Once you've trained a model and have enough
data that you train the model successfully, you can go through a much
larger collection of documents much more quickly than a human being
could do it,” Segal said.
Another
concrete use case that aligns AI with operational efficiency is using
tailored algorithms to convert speech to text.
“If
you can do that, you can make that text searchable, which once again
makes the analyst more productive. So instead of listening to
thousands of hours of audio to hear one relevant audio clip, you put
in a few keywords and scan all this processed text,” Segal said.
(Related)
https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/51191/9781000504422.pdf?sequence=1#page=52
The
technoethics of contemporary intelligence practice
Intelligence
agencies have a history of rapid exploitation of the latest
scientific and technological advances, from the electric telegraph to
radio transmissions and satellite observation. As with warfare, the
history of intelligence can be told in terms of the relative
advantage bestowed by a series of technological innovations ( McNeill
1983 ; Warner 2014 ). This historically close relationship between
intelligence and technology marks out intelligence as a sphere of
activity where issues of “technoethics”1 – of the way in which
technological developments impact on the nature of ethical frameworks
and judgements and the inter-relationship between the two – are
prevalent.
Obvious or not?
https://thenextweb.com/news/slippery-slope-using-ai-and-deepfakes-to-reanimate-history
The
slippery slope of using AI and deepfakes to bring history to life
… For
the past few years, my colleagues and I at UMass
Boston’s Applied Ethics Center have
been studying how everyday
engagement with AI challenges
the way people think about themselves and politics. We’ve found
that AI has the potential to weaken people’s capacity
to make ordinary judgments.
We’ve also found that it undermines
the role of serendipity in
their lives and can lead them to question
what they know or believe about human rights.
Now
AI is making it easier than ever to reanimate the past. Will that
change how we understand history and, as a result, ourselves?
Perspective.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3954591
Next
Era of American Law Is Shaped Via AI And The Law
A commonly accepted notion is that there have been
three primary eras of law in the history of American law. We are
presumably in the fourth era right now. Legal scholars are apt to
contend that AI and the law will abundantly impact the fourth era and
fully shape the fifth era.
(Related)
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3955356
Three-Tiered
Practice Of Law And AI
The practice of law is potentially beginning to
splinter into two tiers, whereby one-tier consists of attorneys and
the second tier consists of non-lawyers seemingly practicing law (to
a limited extent). This is a controversial shifting of the sands.
For some added controversy, we can look toward the future and
perchance envision an added tier of AI-based lawyering.
(Related)
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3954531
Legal
Argumentation and AI
A mainstay of lawyers is their ability to
undertake legal argumentation. This is a skill taught in law school
and matured over the course of a legal career. AI is going to up the
game, so to speak, by providing legal argumentation enablement.
Attorneys need to ready themselves.