But no false citations?

https://www.bespacific.com/expert-witness-used-chatgpt-to-write-report-defending-company-in-deadly-explosion-lawsuit/

Expert Witness Used ChatGPT to Write Report Defending Company in Deadly Explosion Lawsuit

404 Media: “An expert witness testifying in a lawsuit about liability for a Houston explosion that killed three people and destroyed roughly 200 homes used ChatGPT to write significant portions of his “expert report.” The man, who was hired by the industrial product conglomerate 3M, exposed his AI prompts publicly. They showed that he asked ChatGPT to help him “create an exceptional expert witness report defending the standard of care at 3M,” and that the report should “show how 3M is 0% at fault for the explosion at Watson Grinding.” The incident shows that artificial intelligence has made its way into courtrooms not just in AI-generated legal briefings, hallucinated cases, and adversarial “prompt injections,” but in expert witness testimonies. Court transcripts, deposition documents, and discovery records shared with 404 Media show extensive AI use in an extremely high profile case, where multiple people died and hundreds of millions of dollars in total liability are at stake in ongoing litigation about the explosion. The case also shows that the specific prompts used to create this type of expert testimony can be discoverable during a case, and that those prompts can be quite embarrassing. (Prompts provided in the case are here)…”

And therefore AI will increasingly reference AI generated “facts.”

https://thenextweb.com/news/pew-ai-authorship-web-pages-study

Pew says 10% of the web now shows signs of AI authorship

Pew found strong signs of AI authorship in around 10% of a random sample of webpages in July 2026, rising to more than a third among pages published since ChatGPT’s release. Commercial domains carry most of it, at about 10% of .com against roughly 1% of .edu and .gov.

Perception is everything…

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2026/08/21/trump-bans-children-from-investing-in-esg/

Trump bans children from ethical investing

New White House-backed fund will ban ESG investments to protect under-18s from ‘political activism’

Inevitable.

https://www.bespacific.com/flock-has-a-powerful-new-ai-tool-for-police/

Flock Has a Powerful New AI Tool for Police

404 Media: “Flock’s surveillance cameras have already sparked outrage. WIRED reconstructed its next-generation AI system, already in use by some police, to confirm it goes much further than tracking license plates.  Vehicle surveillance giant Flock Safety has told the public for years that its technology “cannot recognize, identify, or track individuals.” It has now built a system that does both, an artificial intelligence tool for police that can identify drivers and track vehicles by their patterns of movement alone, WIRED has learned. Drawing on a network of cameras that logs the movements of drivers in more than 6,000 communities, the tool can pick out potential witnesses by how often their cars pass through a neighborhood, or surface a driver’s “associates” from the cameras they pass together. Because the system also reaches police case files, 911 dispatch logs, and commercial identity records, those plates can be turned into names, home addresses, and relatives. It can search for people in an area drawn on a map based on nothing more than a physical description. The software, originally called Nightshift and more recently renamed OS Investigate, ships with 69 prewritten prompts that officers can select, review, or edit, and then submit to the AI. Officers can also input prompts of their own. The suggested prompts sit in a cache of more than 450 files that WIRED found on Flock’s own website, served by its login pages to anyone who loaded them. The code describes 45 tools at the AI’s disposal, giving it access to plate scans and camera metadata, arrest records, case files, dispatch logs, ballistics results, and commercial databases that contain Social Security numbers, dates of birth, phone numbers, email addresses, relatives and associates. Flock says it is testing the product with a small group of law enforcement partners and describes it as still in development, with capabilities that may not reflect what it eventually sells. It arrives as the company faces bipartisan political pressure, a growing record of officers caught misusing its platform, and a wave of vandalism that has left cameras sawed off and lenses painted over in cities across the country…”

See also TechSpot: “…Flock’s fastest-growing business is 60 mph police drones that can read license plates from the sky. Privacy groups warn that flying plate readers could expand surveillance far beyond roadside cameras.. Flock is best known for the roadside cameras now operating in more than 6,000 US communities. But the company is increasingly betting on drones that can be dispatched to emergency scenes before police officers arrive. A Flock spokesperson said the firm has secured more than 200 DFR customers, including police departments and private companies. It’s also ramping up production of its US-designed drones, which will be built in Georgia. In an interview with the All-In podcast, CEO Garrett Langley explained that the drones sit in climate-controlled rooftop docks, usually on police precincts or fire departments. “When a 911 call happens, instead of sending an officer first, you can send a drone,” he said…”

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people to use nudify apps.

https://thenextweb.com/news/xai-minnesota-nudify-ban-doj-injunction-hearing

The Justice Department is backing xAI against Minnesota’s nudify ban

The US Department of Justice has stepped into a court fight on the side of Elon Musk’s xAI. It is backing the company’s challenge to a Minnesota law that bans AI “nudification” tools. A federal judge heard arguments on Wednesday and said he would rule soon, according to Courthouse News Service.

xAI wants a preliminary injunction to block the law while its lawsuit proceeds. The company sued Minnesota in July, arguing the statute violates the First Amendment. The case is X.AI LLC v. Keith Ellison, the state’s attorney general, before Judge Donovan Frank in the District of Minnesota.

The Justice Department filed a statement of interest on 18 August. It did not take a side on the injunction itself. Instead, it argued that the Minnesota law reaches further than federal law. It also warned that heavy state rules could slow the AI industry.

Clever approach?

https://thenextweb.com/news/australia-news-bargaining-incentive-passes-parliament

Meta, Google, TikTok, and LinkedIn now face an Australian news law whether they carry news or not

Australia’s parliament passed the News Bargaining Incentive on Thursday, closing a five-year argument that began when Meta worked out it could avoid paying for news by simply not carrying any. The new law removes that option.

Platforms with a significant search or social media service in Australia and more than A$250mn (about $178mn) in local advertising revenue now face a levy of 2.5% on that advertising revenue, whether or not they host a single news story. When the government first set out the scheme, the rate was 2.25%, and the list of names has grown since.

… The tax is not really meant to be collected, but it is designed as a price on refusing to negotiate, and a platform can reduce or eliminate it by striking commercial agreements with at least eight Australian news businesses.

Tools & Techniques.

https://www.zdnet.com/article/you-can-earn-your-google-al-professional-certificate-for-free/

You can earn your Google Al Professional Certificate for free - and I highly recommend it

After working through the first few modules, I had mixed feelings about recommending the course to earn a Google AI Professional Certificate, mostly because it starts with some inconveniences and annoyances. But after completing the course and considering what you get going through the whole thing, I highly recommend it.

And it’s still not a widely covered news event…

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/aug/17/meta-lawsuits-ai-cybersecurity

Meta’s legal jeopardy is growing by the day

… Twenty-nine state attorneys general accuse the company of knowingly designing addictive products that harm the mental health of children.

The accusations are similar to a suit brought by an individual earlier this year, a young woman, that the company had negligently operated defective products. She won her case.

Another state, New Mexico, brought a suit to trial against Meta earlier this year, accusing the company of knowing of and allowing for child sexual exploitation on its social networks. Meta also lost that case, and a judge imposed a nearly billion-dollar fine over the phases of the trial. The accusations by New Mexico’s attorney general bear less resemblance to Tuesday’s case than the young woman’s, focusing on crimes committed on Facebook rather than damage to a person brought on by their own use of the social network.

Is this not election interference?

https://apnews.com/article/polling-poll-fake-median-karen-bass-los-angeles-669c90cc77664546791185625d43ffda

Fake polling from mysterious company highlights danger of unvetted election surveys

 Locked in a competitive reelection race, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass declared on social media last week that a new poll was evidence that her campaign was “gaining momentum.”

Just a few days later, the truth emerged: The poll was fabricated.

The California results were among at least three “polls” across three states posted online this month by Median Strategies, a previously unknown organization that admitted to the Los Angeles Times on Monday that the purported results were fake. The company wrote before shuttering its website this week that it “was created as a short-term social experiment examining how purported polling information could enter and spread through the political information ecosystem without independent verification.”

The post offered no explanation of who was behind the “experiment” or for what purpose.

It’s confusing. Who is in charge? Who are we negotiating with?

https://www.ncr-iran.org/en/news/economy/irans-regime-shows-cracks-cabinet-infighting-oil-brokers-and-anti-irgc-protests/

Iran’s Regime Shows Cracks: Cabinet Infighting, Oil Brokers, and Anti-IRGC Protests

The clerical regime in Iran is rapidly transitioning from a state of chronic economic distress into complete administrative disintegration. Confronted by systemic institutional breakdowns, senior officials are openly admitting that the ruling apparatus is losing control.

Can you read his or should your computer read it for you?

https://www.bespacific.com/educators-are-worried-that-many-students-can-no-longer-write-essays-without-ai/

Educators are worried that many students can no longer write essays without A.I.

Educators are worried that many students can no longer write essays without A.I. And it’s costing more than just grammar skills. The New York Times, no paywall: “After years of studying how human beings write, the cognitive psychologist Ronald T. Kellogg concluded that drafting a basic persuasive essay was as mentally taxing as digging a ditch was physically exhausting. Writing well requires a command of vocabulary, spelling and grammar. It forces writers to comprehend a subject, to sift through their working memory of that topic, to organize and plan. Writing an essay is so difficult that a person in the throes of it can do hardly anything else — as anyone who has shushed a spouse or child while trying to compose a decent sentence can attest. Very few people would volunteer to dig a ditch. Likewise, it is hard — almost impossible, many English teachers will admit — to turn a reluctant writer into an enthusiastic one. Yet the American education system expects nearly all students to learn how to write an essay. It’s little wonder, then, that as soon as a tool arrived promising to lessen the pain people grabbed it. Like it or not, artificial intelligence is now firmly embedded in how students produce text. Somewhere between two-thirds and 90 percent of high school and college students are already using A.I. for schoolwork, according to recent surveys, often requesting help with writing assignments. A growing number of educators are alarmed, and insist that students should write without A.I. These teachers are returning to handwriting, blue books and proctored, in-class essay tests  — all attempts to prevent students from outsourcing their writing to chatbots. This is baffling to tech industry leaders, who see A.I. rejection as a form of educational malpractice. They point out that writing is already the leading use of A.I.  in the workplace, and argue there is no need to continue suffering through the task without help. After all, they say, chatbots now exceed the ability of most human beings to produce fluent prose. All this points to some questions about writing itself: Why work so hard to learn it? And what do students stand to lose when they stop facing down a blank page, alone with their thoughts? The scholars who study writing and cognition are rarely reflexively opposed to A.I. Many have spent decades anticipating a leap in computer-assisted writing, just like the one we are living through. They tend to be excited by the technology’s potential…”

Another indication that your data is an asset.

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/business-and-practice/google-aims-to-boost-ai-with-purchase-of-spirit-airlines-data

Google Aims to Boost AI With Purchase of Spirit Airlines Data

Google LLC won a bankruptcy auction for a trove of deindentified business data, software code, and operations records from collapsed low-cost carrier Spirit Aviation Holdings Inc., saying it plans to use the assets to improve its artificial intelligence.

The tech giant’s $10 million bid includes a vast repository of the defunct airline’s data, including 100 million emails, 500 million Microsoft Teams chats and collaboration records, plus information related to revenue, aircraft operations, employee productivity, and audits and fraud, according to an Aug. 14 notice in the US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York.

Do as I say, not as I do.

https://www.reuters.com/world/china/trump-crypto-firm-backs-venture-offering-ai-restricted-chinese-companies-2026-08-17/

Trump crypto firm backs venture offering AI from restricted Chinese companies

President Donald Trump-backed World Liberty Financial is collaborating with a Hong Kong-based venture offering artificial-intelligence models developed by Chinese companies the U.S. administration has flagged for national security concerns.

WorldClaw, founded earlier this year, offers customers access to a suite of AI models and accepts World Liberty’s crypto tokens as payment. The Trump family, through its ownership stake, earns revenue from the use of World Liberty’s tokens.

A Reuters review found that 43 of the 90 models available through WorldClaw’s website, or nearly half, were developed by Alibaba, Baidu, Z.ai and other Chinese technology companies the Trump administration says pose risks to national security and intellectual property. WorldClaw ‌also offers access to dozens of models from U.S. firms such as OpenAI and Anthropic.

Some math is just humbling…

https://gowers.wordpress.com/2026/08/12/what-sort-of-maths-are-llms-good-at/

What sort of maths are LLMs good at?

… These results, and the other eight on the list, are extraordinarily impressive, but it still doesn’t seem to be the case that LLMs are better than all humans at all aspects of mathematics. If they were, then their big speed advantage over us would mean that there would be much more of a flood of results. So it is natural to wonder about what kinds of problems LLMs are good at, and about where there is still room for improvement. I don’t pretend to have a good answer to this question, where a good answer would be a crisp classification that would fit the current examples well, but it is an interesting exercise to try to rule out some bad answers, and to try to identify potential answers that aren’t obviously contradicted by the evidence.

Applicable to other ‘predictions’ as well.

https://punggawajournal.com/aicivia/article/view/101

Can Social Media Tell Us Who Will Kill? Digital Warning Signs and the Problem of Predicting Rare Violence

Digital traces often look persuasive after lethal attacks because the outcome gives earlier posts a meaning they did not necessarily have when first encountered. Threats, grievance, fixation, admiration for earlier attackers, and planning language can matter, but their presence does not solve the harder task of identifying a future offender before violence occurs. This article examines that problem through a qualitative integrative review. Evidence from mass public shootings, targeted violence, threat assessment, computational language analysis, and adjacent risk research shows that digital warning behavior is most informative when it develops as a changing trajectory and converges with preparation outside the platform. Yet retrospective offender studies select cases after the outcome is known, while prospective systems confront a low base rate in which many people display fragments of the same pattern and never commit lethal violence. This tension is conceptualized as the digital prediction paradox. Social media is therefore more defensible as a source of behavioral threat information and triage than as an instrument for assigning individual probabilities of homicide, with important implications for automated detection, policing, privacy, fairness, and proportionate prevention.

Sounds Trumpian…

https://venturebeat.com/orchestration/an-eval-harness-found-what-qualitative-review-couldnt-ai-models-are-most-confident-when-wrong

An eval harness found what qualitative review couldn't: AI models are most confident when wrong

… That last finding is the one that qualitative review would never have surfaced. The model's expressed confidence didn't correlate with its accuracy — it was most confident in the cases where it was most wrong. Without the eval harness measuring against ground truth, that pattern would have been invisible.

Iran follows and can use social media too.

https://www.nbcnews.com/world/iran/iran-rejects-delusions-trump-strait-hormuz-us-territory-rcna592666

Iran rejects ‘delusions’ after Trump says he wants the Strait of Hormuz to be a U.S. territory

A defiant Iran called on the U.S. to “accept the reality of defeat and stop indulging in delusions” after President Donald Trump suggested that he would soon declare the Strait of Hormuz as a “territory of the United States.”

The crucial waterway that handled one-fifth of the world’s oil before the war “cannot be seized with a tweet, nor with an aircraft carrier, nor by issuing an order, nor through an election speech,” Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi said in a post on X early Saturday.

Did we hurt his feelings?

https://www.cpr.org/2026/08/14/trump-retaliation-colorado-email-tina-peters/

Trump push to retaliate against Colorado described as ‘weaponization’

Multiple Colorado congressional lawmakers are speaking out after an email from a White House staffer seemed to confirm that the Trump administration was looking to retaliate against Colorado.

… Republican Rep. Jeff Hurd pointed out that politics has always involved hardball and that presidents of both parties have had disagreements with states in the past. But he worries that this is different.

“We do not know all the facts yet, and the Administration should explain what happened, but federal power cannot be used for political retaliation,” he said in a statement to CPR News. He added if federal agencies were directed to punish Colorado, that “crosses a serious line.”