Saturday, October 24, 2026

I am no longer a teenager. Why do I have to prove that?

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/10/two-states-can-now-restrict-social-media-access-heres-what-do-next

Two States Can Now Restrict Social Media Access—Here’s What To Do Next

Last week, two federal appeals courts issued opinions that will allow Florida and Georgia to start enforcing laws that will age-gate and block young people from accessing social media. The laws do not adequately respect minors’ rights to play, speak, and learn online. More fundamentally, these laws don’t help young people stay safe online—a goal that lawmakers should pursue.

Because of the new laws, some young people will lose their ability to access lawful information, find their online communities, and even engage with school board members. Others will need parental permission to stay online. And adults will face increased demands to prove their age, which will put their privacy at increased risk simply to continue to use the services they already use. 

We opposed these laws because they threaten the free expression and privacy of both minors and adults.  Even though these lawsuits are not over, the injunctions that paused enforcement have been lifted, and the states of Florida and Georgia will now be able to enforce broad restrictions on social media use. 





Ukraine hits data centers, harming only Russia. This could have global impacts.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/iran-has-detailed-plans-hit-gulf-undersea-cables-if-war-resumes-officials-say-2026-10-23/

Iran has detailed plans to hit Gulf undersea cables if war resumes, officials say

Tehran has drawn up detailed plans to target undersea communications cables in the Gulf if the United States and Israel attack Iran again, two senior Iranian security officials told Reuters.

Their comments followed warnings by Iranian officials that undersea cables in the region could become targets in any renewed conflict if diplomacy with Washington ‌collapses.



Friday, October 23, 2026

Will no one take the time to get it right? This is how AI will exterminate us...

https://www.foxnews.com/live-news/ai-hallucination-appeals-court-mississippi-dei-law

Appeals court tosses Mississippi DEI ruling marred by AI hallucinations

A federal appeals court overturned an order blocking Mississippi's ban on diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives in public schools and universities after a district judge acknowledged his staff used artificial intelligence to help draft a ruling found to be riddled with errors.

In an opinion released Thursday, U.S. Circuit Judge Jerry Smith called Judge Henry Wingate's ruling a "botch job" after Wingate said a law clerk used AI to write a draft of the order that was mistakenly docketed.

… He continued: "Those included mention of plaintiffs and defendants not in the complaint, supposed 'declarations' from non-existent or never-present individuals, false quotations purporting to be taken from the text of H.B. 1193, and several erroneous claims that the law had already led to the demise of apparently fictitious programs."





Should we expect deployment of the 82nd Airborne?

https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/trump-humiliated-bombshell-crypto-lawsuit-001429492.html

Trump Humiliated in Bombshell Crypto Lawsuit

Donald Trump was sued Thursday by a cryptocurrency company that claims he violated the Constitution by profiting from deals with a United Arab Emirates official while in office.

… "The President himself has openly admitted that the lack of consequences emboldens him, not only to continue using his high office to enrich himself, but to expand the fortune he is extracting from the trust the American people placed in him."



(Related)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/10/22/trump-says-he-called-google-ceo-sundar-pichai-discuss-renaming-atlantic-ocean/

Trump says he called Google’s CEO to discuss renaming Atlantic Ocean

The president said he discussed renaming the Atlantic Ocean with Google CEO Sundar Pichai, who replied: "Please don't ask us to do that."



Thursday, October 22, 2026

Something to circulate…

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/10/introducing-our-new-surveillance-self-defense-guide-online-privacy-parents-and

Introducing Our New Surveillance Self-Defense Guide: Online Privacy for Parents and Youth

The internet is a vast and confusing place no matter your age. Trying to help youth engage with it safely and privately is a complicated topic that touches on many different skillsets and ideas. But just because it’s complicated doesn’t mean it’s impossible. We’ve launched our Online Privacy for Parents and Youth Surveillance Self-Defense guide in hopes to provide a framework for finding solutions that work for you. 





I doubt this is new. It may be a simple reorganization. Can you imagine that we have not had offensive capabilities before?

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/10/22/technology-support-office-dod-tech-spyware-sabotage-01100327

The Pentagon is quietly building an elite new tech sabotage agency

The creation of the Technology Support Office signals the Defense Department's intent to ramp up a range of aggressive covert activities abroad.





Perhaps too much?

https://www.foreignaffairs.com/china/empires-artificial-intelligence-niall-ferguson-eric-schmidt

Empires of AI

In the span of a few years, China and the United States have each assembled something future historians might recognize as a new kind of empire. Their dominions extend not merely over territory, trade routes, and airspace but over knowledge itself. By controlling the large language models, chips, physical infrastructure, and capital that provide the foundations for advanced machine cognition, Beijing and Washington are not only attaining new heights of economic performance and power projection; they are also setting the terms of all future scientific and intellectual progress. The term “AI superpowers” fails to capture the influence and reach that these rivals now wield. Even without active alliance building or coercion, they can make all other countries that seek access to advanced AI beholden to them.





How much is that times 50 states?

https://www.foxbusiness.com/technology/meta-ordered-pay-25b-jury-finds-misled-facebook-users

Meta ordered to pay $25B after jury finds it misled users on data privacy

Meta Platforms has been ordered to pay $25 billion after a New Mexico jury found the company misled Facebook users over its handling of personal data and other practices in a case stemming from the Cambridge Analytica scandal.

New Mexico Judge Francis Mathew issued the penalty Wednesday after jurors found last month that Meta made dozens of misleading statements to users.

"Facebook's wrongdoing — over the course of years and systematically broadcast to the public — goes to the heart of Facebook's core business practices," Mathew wrote in his order.



Wednesday, October 21, 2026

Privacy Foundation seminar Generative AI in Law Practice and Legal Education Friday, October 23rd from Noon – 2PM University of Denver, Sturm College of Law, Room 412

Speakers: Justice Maria E. Berkenkotter, Colorado Supreme Court Judge Lino S. Lipinsky de Orlov, Colorado Court of Appeals





Think of it as childish pranks aided by criminal adults…

https://www.theregister.com/security/2026/10/21/ai-has-potential-to-turn-script-kiddies-into-sophisticated-infrastructure-attackers/5304297

AI has 'potential' to turn script kiddies into sophisticated infrastructure attackers

When it comes to cyberattacks that shut down power grids, drinking-water systems, and other critical infrastructure, AI doesn’t – yet – turn script kiddies into sophisticated, nation-state attackers. But “the potential is there,” according to operational technology (OT) security experts.

"One thing that we've relied on for years is security by obscurity when it comes to utilities," said Steve Swick, former chief information security officer at American Electric Power. "The knowledge needed to do some of that stuff is getting less likely to be necessary," Swick added during a media panel ahead of the publication of Frenos' State of AI in Security report.

… “Basic access can recon documentation, and distill through that documentation very quickly to find out critical design features of your plant and facility,” said Paul Shaver, head of OT at Armadin, during the panel. “I can download the manual for almost any automation controller, parse through that very quickly, and come up with ways that I can exploit a dedicated feature of something that was not secure by design.”





Think, rethink, counter-think, etc.

https://arnaudbertrand.substack.com/p/whats-left-for-us-after-ai-chinas

What’s left for us after AI? China’s thinkers have very different answers

This is perhaps one of the great ironies of our time: China is increasingly shaping the future of AI, yet very few people in the West have the faintest idea how its key thinkers see it - its philosophers, sociologists or ethicists.

… Have you, for instance, ever heard of Zhao Tingyang? Probably not, and yet he may be the most original thinker on AI you’ve never read. He’s one of China’s most prominent philosophers, at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. While Silicon Valley spends billions trying to make AI share our values, he for one argues that doing so “may very well be a suicidal mistake”.

… Or take Liu Yongmou, a philosopher of technology at Renmin University in Beijing. His thinking is almost the opposite of ours. Where we fear machines that become more and more like us, he says that “humanity’s biggest problem is the machinization of humans, not the humanization of machines”



Tuesday, October 20, 2026

Might be useful…

https://www.bespacific.com/find-the-citations-that-need-a-second-look-before-you-file/

Find the citations that need a second look before you file.

CiteProof checks every citation in your brief against public court records — including AI-fabricated citations — and quoted passages in paid checks. You get a report that shows what verified, what needs your attention, and what we could not check.



Monday, October 19, 2026

A firm grasp of the obvious?

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/10/america-now-ally-russia/689066/

America Is Now an Ally of Russia

In the past week, the president of the United States has conclusively turned America into an ally of the Russian Federation.

Donald Trump has now abandoned pretense and is openly aiding the Kremlin in its war against a friend and partner of the U.S. The American commander in chief has abandoned the Western order, the most successful—and powerful—security arrangement in human history. To judge from the available evidence, he has not done so out of a cold calculation of the national interest. Instead, he has based his decisions on his own interests; his open admiration for Russia’s dictator; his resentment of Ukraine’s democratically elected president; and quite possibly other factors that so far have remained obscured from the American public.





Interesting article.

https://thedailyeconomy.org/article/ai-and-the-knowledge-problem-in-higher-ed/

AI and the Knowledge Problem in Higher Ed

A familiar bit of bureaucratic reasoning, described as “politician’s logic” in the British comedy Yes, Prime Minister, goes something like this: Something must be done. This is something. Therefore, we must do it.

I suspect some of the rush to create AI courses at colleges and universities reflects this sort of thinking. Universities recognize that artificial intelligence is changing the workplace. They want graduates to be prepared for those changes. Creating a course, or perhaps a sequence of courses, seems like an obvious response.

But it isn’t clear that creating an AI course will actually address the problem.

AI is already changing accounting, marketing, finance, nursing, engineering, economics, and dozens of other fields. Universities are understandably concerned about preparing students to use these tools. But what does it mean to promise graduates a working knowledge of AI? And who is qualified to teach it?





Good news and bad news.

https://www.bespacific.com/uneven-intelligence-of-ai-in-comparative-constitutional-law/

The (Currently) Uneven Intelligence of AI in Comparative Constitutional Law

Chilton, Adam, Langlois, Arthur, Dittmer, Jan-Ulrich; Versteeg, Mila: The (Currently) Uneven Intelligence of AI in Comparative Constitutional Law: From Years of Research to a Single Prompt?, VerfBlog, 2026/10/14, https://verfassungsblog.de/the-currently-uneven-intelligence-of-ai-in-comparative-constitutional-law/, DOI: 10.59704/a3baf260ef374567.  

This potential has inspired numerous projects exploring how AI could help scholarship on constitutional law. For example, there is research using AI to interpret constitutions, apply constitutional principles, and predict court rulings. Even the question of whether AI could improve the process of constitution-making has been studied. AI’s potential is particularly significant for comparative constitutional research. Systematically comparing legal systems requires locating sources from different jurisdictions, which are often difficult to access and only available in local languages. The creation of comparative legal datasets has thus involved considerable personnel, time, and financial resources. AI can overcome many of these obstacles. AI models can search for and translate foreign-language sources, filter them, and convert the filtered information into a dataset. In doing so, AI offers the prospect of datasets — which previously required years of research and the efforts of numerous experts and research assistants to compile — being just a prompt away. However, whether AI models can generate comparative law datasets that are qualitatively comparable to human-coded datasets has not yet been addressed (although Guha et al provide an example for a broader legal benchmarking exercise).5) We therefore conducted our own benchmarking study.6) We found evidence suggesting that recent AI models may be able to code simple factual data, but they are likely unreliable substitutes for expert human coders when conceptual or interpretive judgment is required.





Attacks on Ukrainian logistics in other countries.

https://www.lrt.lt/en/news-in-english/19/3086054/attempted-arson-at-lithuanian-firm-storing-starlink-equipment-pm-blames-russia

Attempted arson at Lithuanian firm storing Starlink equipment, PM blames Russia

“Just after midnight last night, there was another incident – an attempt was made to set fire to a Lithuanian company where Starlink communications equipment is stored. The authorities had warned the company about possible attacks, security had been stepped up, and the attempt failed,” Sinkevičius said in a post on Facebook.



Sunday, October 18, 2026

If I refuse to pay the price they want, will that impact future offers? How do they know I refused, increased surveillance? (Privacy Foundation https://law.du.edu/content/the-privacy-foundation seminar on this topic Friday Oct 23rd. Details soon?)

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/retail/2026/10/15/surveillance-shopping-prices/92124063007/

Are you paying more than other shoppers? How to protect your wallet

At a time when American shoppers are seeing price hikes from tariffs, the war with Iran and inflation, there's another reason some shoppers are paying different prices, some consumer advocates and lawmakers say.

It's surveillance pricing, which uses personalized information about you to potentially change the price. That is different than dynamic pricing, which is often called surge pricing, and changes with supply and demand.

"Pricing has changed in our economy and in our country,'' said Lindsay Owens, author of "Gouged: The End of a Fair Price – and What That Means for Your Wallet." "It used to be simple. How much does it cost to make the item, what's the profit margin and put a sticker on it. Now it is a highly engineered science. Companies hire physicists, they hire AI specialists. They build algorithms that can change prices in a nanosecond at retail locations across this country."



(Related)

https://digital.sandiego.edu/mcnair-summer/42/

What, Exactly, Is Surveillance Pricing?



(Related)

https://epic.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/explaining-surveillance-pricing-2026.pdf

EXPLAINING SURVEILLANCE PRICING AND OTHER DATADRIVEN PRICING PRACTICES





Moscow law?

https://criminaljustice.jurisocial.org/index.php/jjccj/article/view/6

Artificial Intelligence and the Transformation of Legal Decision-Making

Artificial intelligence is increasingly used to support legal and public decision-making, including legal research, document review, risk assessment, administrative processing, and other forms of decision support. Its use can improve speed, consistency, and institutional capacity, but it can also create risks concerning opacity, discriminatory effects, automation bias, procedural fairness, privacy, and the allocation of responsibility. This article examines those risks through qualitative doctrinal analysis and focused comparative policy analysis. It considers the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s decision in State v. Loomis, the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act, Canada’s Directive on Automated Decision-Making, Council of Europe guidance on AI and judicial systems, and selected interdisciplinary scholarship. The article argues that the central legal problem is not simply whether an AI system is accurate, but whether its use can be reconciled with requirements of lawful authority, reasoned decision-making, equality, contestability, institutional accountability, and effective remedy. The article further distinguishes decision-support systems from systems that materially automate or determine legal outcomes and argues that the required safeguards should be proportionate to the legal stakes and degree of automation. The analysis also considers Pakistan, where constitutional fair-trial, equality, dignity, and due-process principles provide an existing legal vocabulary for evaluating public-sector AI, while the National Artificial Intelligence Policy 2025 provides a policy framework rather than a substitute for legislation. The article concludes that responsible public-sector AI requires layered governance: lawful authority, impact assessment, procurement controls, validation and monitoring, meaningful human review, reasons and notice, auditability, access to remedy, and institutional technical capacity.