A unique approach?
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=7613699
AI
Consciousness and the Law: Towards an AI Consciousness Legal Protocol
Artificial
intelligence is not yet shown to be conscious, but law cannot wait
for science to settle the question, and it cannot settle the question
by decree. This paper
proposes an AI Consciousness Legal Protocol: defined
technical and legal parameters that must be met before law recognises
the consciousness of an AI system, an independent body to apply them,
and rules that govern AI in the meantime. The central position is
that recognition of consciousness, criminal capacity and legal
personhood are three separate questions, and that human
accountability for AI survives all three.
Resource?
https://ojs.bonviewpress.com/index.php/JCLLT/article/view/12557
Inaugural
Editorial: Charting New Frontiers at the Intersection of Law,
Technology, and Computation
I am very
pleased to introduce the inaugural issue of the Journal of
Computational Law and Legal Technology (JCLLT). This journal is
founded at a remarkable moment in history, when advances in
computation, artificial intelligence, data science, and digital
technologies are transforming not only how law is practised but also
how legal systems are conceived, interpreted, and governed.
AI Law: a
field in change.
https://lawjournals.celnet.in/index.php/jltcpl/article/view/2202
TORTIOUS
LIABILITY FOR CYBER HARASSMENT AND VIRTUAL HARM: REIMAGINING THE LAW
OF TORTS IN THE DIGITAL AGE
The
transformation of social interaction from the physical world to the
digital environment has generated forms of injury that were largely
unknown when the modern law of torts developed. Cyber harassment,
cyberstalking, doxxing, cyberbullying, online defamation,
impersonation, non-consensual dissemination of intimate images,
deepfake abuse, identity manipulation and persistent digital
surveillance can cause profound injury without any physical contact
between the wrongdoer and the victim. The consequences may include
loss of reputation, invasion of privacy, psychological suffering,
disruption of family and professional relationships,
physical-security risks and economic loss.
… This
article examines whether and how the law of torts can accommodate
cyber harassment and virtual harm. It develops the concept of the
“digital personality” as an extension of the legally protected
personality of the individual and argues that privacy, reputation,
dignity, informational autonomy and digital identity should receive
meaningful tortious protection.
One question
answered, if we can trust his word.
https://thehill.com/policy/international/6170415-musk-starlink-ukraine-slowdown/
Musk
says he was behind Starlink’s slowdown in Ukraine
… Musk
initially
claimed that the decisions to restrict the speed or usage of
Starshield are made by the U.S. military and, ultimately, the
president.
He maintained
his claim in Saturday’s post saying Starshield “is controlled by
the US government. What they decide to do is up to them.”
… “Either
the President was lying or Musk was lying, but the decision to slow
down satellite speed and access has life or death consequences for
Ukraine,” Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) wrote on social
media. “This deserves a full investigation by the Senate.
Elon Musk should be compelled to testify before Congress and under
oath.”
Shoot the cash
cow to starve your opponent.
https://nationalsecurityjournal.org/ukraine-might-have-found-putins-weakness-and-wont-stop-hitting-it-with-drones-and-missiles/
Ukraine
Might Have Found Putin’s Weakness and Won’t Stop Hitting It With
Drones and Missiles
Ukraine’s
strike campaign is hitting Russia’s oil industry where it is
weakest, its aging fields and strained repair capacity. Now, one
analyst argues, both Trump and Putin want Kyiv to ease up, as The
Wall Street Journal reports the White House and Musk coordinated on
throttling Starshield ahead of the midterms.