Become Big Brother as a defensive strategy? (Or be sued when such content becomes public?)
https://thehackernews.com/2026/11/apple-to-start-scanning-publicly-shared.html
Apple to Start Scanning Publicly Shared iCloud Photos and Files for Harmful Content
Apple has revealed that it plans to start checking public iCloud links for harmful content starting with iOS 27.3, iPadOS 27.3, macOS 27.3, and visionOS 27.3.
The change specifically applies to scenarios where users share iCloud content, such as photos in iCloud Photos or files in iCloud Drive, by sharing a link and making it accessible to "Anyone with the link."
When users choose this option, it makes the content accessible to anyone who has the link, including Apple, the iPhone maker said.
… That said, it's unclear what prompted this change, what Apple considers as "harmful content," and whether these checks will also be applied retroactively to previously generated links, as well as any new links created before the 27.3 updates are officially rolled out later this December.
The tech giant has also warned that if users attempt to upload harmful content, it can be removed or deleted at any time.
How can I not personalize?
FTC Announces Inquiry into Personalized Pricing and Employee Compensation
On October 28, 2026, the Federal Trade Commission announced the agency had launched an inquiry into the use of personal information to set prices and employee compensation, issuing detailed requests for information to nine airlines, ride-sharing companies, and food-delivery firms.
Another taxpayer funded income source?
https://krebsonsecurity.com/2026/11/want-to-rent-an-internet-address-at-the-white-house/
Want to Rent an Internet Address at the White House?
Several staffers at the White House are using computers or mobile devices equipped with residential proxy services that render their internet address available for others to rent, security experts warned today. One of the proxy services is a Russian company whose founder’s web hosting business was ground zero for cyberattacks against election systems in Arizona and Illinois in 2016.
The problem is they sometimes work…
We’re Asking the Ninth Circuit to Hold Reverse Location Warrants Categorically Unconstitutional
Yesterday, along with the ACLU, EFF filed an amicus brief in the Ninth Circuit court of appeals in United States v. Spurlock, a case involving a “tower dump” warrant. These overbroad warrants require cellular providers to turn over location data about every phone in a given area at a given time. This is the first such case to be heard by a federal appeals court since the US Supreme Court ruled this summer that highly similar “geofence” warrants are searches under the meaning of the Fourth Amendment.