Perhaps eradication is possible?
https://www.bespacific.com/the-first-100-effective-hiv-prevention-drug-is-approved-and-going-global/
The first 100% effective HIV prevention drug is approved and going global
Refractor: “An epidemic that’s been sustained for 44 years might finally be quelled, with the milestone approval of the first HIV drug that offers 100% protection with its twice-yearly injections. It’s a landmark achievement that stands to save millions of lives across the globe. The makers are also providing affordable access to the drug in the US and beyond, signing royalty-free licensing agreements with six generic manufacturers to produce and supply it.
Messy. It’s gonna be messy. AI isn’t a person so we have a ‘thing’ acting independently?
https://www.wired.com/story/openai-anthropic-ai-hacking-sprees-illegal/
The OpenAI and Anthropic AI Hacking Sprees Are a Messy New Legal Frontier
Who is legally responsible when agentic AI goes rogue, and what recourse do victims have when they've been breached by joyriding models? Great question.
In the wake of disclosures from both OpenAI and Anthropic that versions of their models escaped containment during internal cybersecurity experiments and hacked real-world organizations, calls for government regulation of AI have been mounting. But as more and more incidents emerge, questions about legal liability and repercussions have also come to the fore.
Researchers and lawyers WIRED spoke to emphasize that these questions have not been answered in practice in the United States legal system. In other words, there haven't been decisions in enough relevant cases for the picture to start to form. But the recent high-profile incidents from OpenAI and Anthropic suggest that answers will need to come soon.
Can we prove that existing DNA has not been hacked?
https://thenextweb.com/news/thermo-fisher-dna-evidence-file-tampering-flaw-cve-2026-17583
A flaw in crime-lab software let AI rewrite DNA evidence in 45 minutes, without a trace.
The software most American crime labs use to read DNA evidence carried a flaw. It let someone with the right access quietly rewrite the results, and leave almost no trace. AI made the attack easy. Thermo Fisher Scientific has now patched it. But the fix only guards files created from here on.
The weakness sits in several Applied Biosystems tools that turn a DNA sample into a digital file. The company’s security bulletin says an attacker could alter the .fsa and .hid files those machines produce before analysis software loads them. That works only if someone first bypasses a lab’s controls. The flaw carries the identifier CVE-2026-17583 and a high severity score of 8.2.
A topical freebie…
Get “Trickle Down” Theory and “Tax Cuts for the Rich”
This book examines the common idea that higher tax rates on the “rich” increase government revenues. Based on empirical and careful analysis, Sowell examines this hypothesis and revisits the origins of the ideas of “Trickle Down” Theory and “Tax Cuts for the Rich”—in his signature style that we’ve all come to love.