Is this a
reasonable extension of the Mark I Eyeball and the Police Officer's
memory? It parallels the license plate recognition systems in broad
use. Unfortunately, it seems rather clunky if they need to carry a
Smartphone (not to mention a Tablet) but I suppose they don't want to
integrate it into an “always on” Cop-Cam either...
Jennifer Lynch writes:
The
San Diego regional planning agency, SANDAG,
has been quietly rolling out a new mobile face recognition system
that will sharply change how police conduct simple stops on
Americans. The system, which allows officers to use mobile devices
to collect face images out in the field, already has a database of
1.4 million images and serves nearly 25 federal, state and local law
enforcement agencies in the region.
Over
the summer, EFF sent a California Public Records Act request to
SANDAG for more information on the program. From the records we
received, we’ve learned that the program, called “TACIDS”
(Tactical Identification System), serves law enforcement agencies as
diverse as the San Diego Sheriff’s Department, the DEA, ICE, the
California Highway Patrol and even the San Diego Unified School
District.
Read more on EFF.
[From
the article:
The officers use a
Samsung
tablet or Android mobile phone to take a picture of a person “in
the field” and run that picture against databases of mugshot photos
and DMV images from across several states to learn his or her
identity. According to users, the system returns high-accuracy
results in about eight seconds.
It is
likely too much to ask Congress to remember who NSA's customers are
or what the original strategy was.
Walter Pincus writes:
Whatever
the National Security Agency was doing with Angela Merkel’s
cellphone number for the past 10 years may have been poorly conceived
— even reckless — but it didn’t violate U.S. law.
No
violation of U.S. law is associated with the collection by the NSA’s
Signals Intelligence Directorate (SID) — as disclosed by the
Guardian newspaper last month — of phone numbers of foreign
government officials and politicians. Nor is it illegal for the NSA
to receive from French and Spanish security agencies for storage and
possible analysis millions of numbers of their citizens.
[...]
As
Congress considers reforms in the NSA’s collection of electronic
intelligence, the focus should be on legislation protecting the
privacy of U.S. citizens, not foreigners overseas, no matter who the
foreigners are or what positions they hold.
Read more on the
Washington
Post.
I must
admit I had to Google 'lenity.' It's probably Okay, as long as it
doesn't devolve into “It's not fair!”
Steven Vladeck writes:
I
was on the same
panel as Orin at Monday’s day-long
hearing before the Privacy & Civil Liberties Oversight Board,
and think there’s a lot to commend his proposal for a statutory
rule of lenity as a tool to regulate national security
surveillance–to scale back the government’s ability to push for
expansive interpretations of the specific authorities that Congress
has provided. Indeed, Orin’s
post from Tuesday expounding upon this idea is a must-read,
regardless of where one comes down on the current scope of FISA and
the need for / merits of reform proposals.
Read more on Lawfare.
I have
been saying (and pointing to news articles to illustrate) that
teachers think they know more than parents, school boards know more
than teachers, and the further up the governmental food chain you go
the greater the know-it-alls you find.
Gary Stern reports on
the situation in New York
With
a rare level of urgency, school officials are scrambling to keep
extensive student records out of a privately run database that is a
key part of the state’s reform agenda.
Local
officials, once again at odds with the state Education Department,
have grave concerns about what will happen to more than 400
categories of student data once they are uploaded to a Web cloud run
by inBloom, a non-profit group funded by the Gates Foundation and
supported by Amazon.
[...]
More
than 20 districts in the Lower Hudson Valley have pulled out of New
York’s participation in the federal Race to the Top initiative,
hoping that doing so will allow them to withhold certain data.
Since the state has said that this strategy will not work,
districts are now writing to inBloom directly and requesting that
their student records be deleted.
Read more on LoHud.
The districts’ request will not be honored, though, because
inBloom has no direct contract with districts and the state education
department has already indicated it will not honor districts’
requests on this.
Any lawyers think there
are grounds for a federal lawsuit by districts against the state?
[It will likely be defended by anyone who sees the
database as a way to shape their advertising... Bob]
Granted this one is a
bit extreme. Would this question apply to anyone who happened to
have the skills to do what the police thought needed doing? (a clip
from a longer article)
… By now, I expect
that most people are aware of a disturbing case in New Mexico first
reported by KOB.
David Eckert is suing the police, a deputy district attorney, a
medical center, and two doctors for subjecting him to repeated
digital rectal examinations, multiple enemas, stomach and chest
x-rays, for making him defecate in front of the police and medical
personnel so they could search his stool for drugs, and for then
performing a colonoscopy under general anesthesia.
David Eckert did not request those medical
procedures. Nor did he consent to them. So how did this happen?
Why did he have to go through such degrading and invasive procedures
and why did the two doctors cooperate?
Useful as “background”
If you haven’t seen
Alessandro Acquisti’s TED talk, “Why Privacy Matters,” wouldn’t
this be a good weekend to watch it:
Another
alternative to PowerPoint and a tool for my website students.
EWC
Presenter - Create Animated Infographics
EWC
Presenter is a new tool from Easy Web Content (a website creation
and hosting service). EWC Presenter makes it easy to create
slideshows, banner graphics, and interactive infographics. The
slideshow creator and banner graphic creator don't stand-out from
other tools like them. The EWC Presenter's infographic animation
option is worth noting.
EWC
Presenter's infographic tool allows you to animate elements
within your infographic. The video below demonstrates how that is
done.
My students are already
in Jeopardy
eQuizShow
Makes It Easy to Create Jeopardy-style Games
Last winter I reviewed
eQuizShow,
a service built by a high school student in New York. This week I
revisited the site and found that it has been redesigned yet still
offers an easy way for teachers to create Jeopardy-style review
games. Unlike similar tools you do not have to download or upload
any PowerPoint files to use eQuizShow. On eQuizShow you can build
and display your quiz completely online. To build your quiz just
enter a title, an administrative password, and your question
categories. eQuizShow will then generate a grid on which you can
enter questions and answers.
If you don't have time
to build a quiz or you just need some inspiration, browse the
eQuizShow
gallery. When you play the games you have the option to assign
points to up to six teams playing the game. You can also play
without awarding points.
eQuizShow
works well on interactive whiteboards. If you have an interactive
whiteboard, using eQuizShow could be a good way to display questions
and answers to students during a review session.