Not to be confused with a payoff
to a political supporter.
https://thenextweb.com/news/palantir-pentagon-244m-no-bid-feinberg-memo
A
Pentagon memo tells staff to spend $244m with Palantir. Its subject
line is ‘Funding Palantir’
… US
Deputy Secretary of Defense Stephen Feinberg directed subordinates to
buy up to $243.9m of services from Palantir by 31 March 2027, without
a competitive process, The
Register reported, citing a source. The subject line
is “Funding Palantir”.
The
memo goes further than that single figure. It also tells the
department’s acquisition and comptroller chiefs to work with
military leaders on finding more money for the company, covering
April 2027 to the end of 2028.
Perhaps I
should get back in the hacking business? (Not that I ever was….)
https://thenextweb.com/news/trump-cyber-memo-transnational-crime
President
Donald Trump signs memo letting US agencies hack transnational crime
groups abroad
President
Donald Trump has signed a National Security Presidential Memorandum
authorising US federal law enforcement to conduct offensive cyber
operations against transnational criminal organisations operating
abroad.
… The most
eyebrow-raising clause concerns the private sector. The coordination
centre is directed to “leverage the capability and innovation of
the private sector” to carry out operations under government
direction and control.
In other
words, private firms could
be enlisted to help the state break into criminal
infrastructure abroad, a line many governments have been careful
never to cross out loud.
That is where
the European reader’s eyebrow tends to stay raised. Offensive
hacking sanctioned by a state, even against unambiguously nasty
targets, is a capability that does not switch off cleanly once it is
switched on.
As expected?
https://thenextweb.com/news/meta-756k-australian-teen-accounts-removed
Meta
says it has removed 756,000 Australian teen accounts, but most
under-16s are still online
… On
paper, that is a bold regulatory experiment. In practice, the early
evidence is far less flattering, because Australia
has already accused Meta, TikTok, and YouTube of not complying as
regulators lose patience with the industry’s progress.
The
gap between the numbers and reality is stark. Independent research
and government figures indicate that more than 80% of under-16s were
still using social media during the ban’s first three months, which
suggests the removed accounts are a fraction of the teenagers
actually online.
None
of this is especially surprising to anyone who has watched teenagers
meet a rule they dislike. Lying about a birthday, borrowing an
adult’s details, or spinning up a fresh account takes minutes, so
the ban works
far better on paper than it does in practice.
I could see
this coming, was it part of Trump’s strategy?
https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/12/business/truth-social-lawsuit
Trump
sued on First and Fifth Amendment grounds over paid Truth Social
access
President
Donald Trump’s expensive subscription for instant access to his
Truth Social posts is unconstitutional, according to a federal
lawsuit filed Wednesday.
The Intercept
and the Freedom of the Press Foundation jointly sued Trump and his
White House social media team for restricting their access to the
president’s posts on Truth Social. The plaintiffs claim Trump
violated their First and Fifth Amendment rights.
Trump
frequently uses his company’s platform to announce policy
decisions, executive orders, personnel changes and war declarations.
… “There’s
no de minimis exception for restrictions on fundamental First
Amendment rights,” Sus told CNN. “Even if, hypothetically, the
delay was milliseconds, it would be a First Amendment violation.”
… But
Trump may be selling access to something that – despite posting on
his own platform – he doesn’t legally own.
“The
president’s official statements are not the private data of a
company but are owned by the United States under the Presidential
Records Act,” Sus argued.
In its
complaint, the Freedom of the Press Foundation argued that Truth API
could restrict its ability to scrape all the president’s posts and
determine which are anti-media arguments – a core product that the
group offers. And the Intercept said it risked losing out to
competitors on timely news stories.
That’s why
the Truth API product may also violate the due process and equal
protection clauses of the Fifth Amendment, they argue in the
complaint.