Ukraine. Maybe Tom
Clancy was right in his last novel. Russia moved lots of Russians
into the Ukraine (and other countries) during the days of the Soviet
Union, and they stayed. Now they provide an excuse for intervention.
Perhaps not with tanks, but a simple twist of the natural gas value
would get Europe's attention.
So is this just
increasing the pressure, or “fair warning?”
Russian
upper house approves use of force in Ukraine
Reads like a return to
“pre-Internet” logic.
Barbara LaBoe reports:
Appeals
of two Longview drug convictions led to a far-reaching state Supreme
Court decision Thursday that people have the right to
privacy in sending and receiving text messages.
In
separate 5-4 opinions, the justices overturned two Cowlitz County
heroin convictions in cases that hinged on text messages a detective
read on someone else’s phone.
Read more on TDN.
Gene Johnson of AP also has coverage here,
and the Seattle Times covers the ruling here.
[From
the AP article:
The court struck down
Roden's conviction under the state privacy act, which bars police
from intercepting in-state private communications without a warrant
or the consent of all parties involved. It overturned Hinton's
conviction under the privacy protections of the state Constitution.
[From
the Seattle Times article:
Consider a low-tech
analogy: “Just because a letter is sitting in your mailbox doesn’t
mean the cops get to open it,” Fakhoury said. “The Washington
court said there shouldn’t be a difference” between privacy
protections on mail, phone calls and text messages.
A
person’s privacy interest isn’t “surrendered once you hit send
on your phone,” he said.
I'm not sure how this
“ensures” safety on campus. If someone plans to vandalize the
Dean's car, I doubt they will bring their ID badge. Same for
break-in artists, or did they break-in by unlocking the front door?
What crimes are addressed by using the ID badge as a meal card,
library card, or whatever? If they want to track students like Big
Brother, why not just say so?
Alec Torres reports:
Beginning
Saturday, March 1, students and staff at Tennessee State University
will be required to present identification badges at any time that
can also track their movements in and out of buildings, according to
a local-news report.
After
a spate of break-ins and vandalism, officials at the university
instituted the new ID requirement as a way to ensure safety on
campus, a TSU release
said.
Of course, it doesn’t
stop there, although it would be concerning enough if it did. The
same ID cards have other uses as well:
Besides
being used to access buildings, the IDs can be used as meal cards, to
check out library materials, to access computer labs and athletic
events, and more.
Read more on National
Review Online.
So who will be data
mining and commercializing all these data, because you just know
it’s going to happen?
[From
the National Review article:
“Failure to comply
with the new policy,” the school said, “may result in employee
disciplinary action, student judicial action, or removal from
University property.” [Sounds like they are sure
their students are the criminals here. Bob]
Interesting. What does
the data tell us? Is a digital clock face, telling us it is 8:02PM
as “speech-like” as a computer log entry that alerts us to an
unauthorized access?
Paper
– Is Data Speech?
by Sabrina
I. Pacifici on February 28, 2014
Is
Data Speech? January 2014 66 Stan. L. Rev. 57. Jane Bambauer,
Associate Professor of Law, University of Arizona, James E. Rogers
College of Law; J.D., Yale Law School; B.S., Yale College.
“Privacy
laws rely on the unexamined assumption that the collection of data is
not speech. That assumption is incorrect. Privacy
scholars, recognizing an imminent clash between this long-held
assumption and First Amendment protections of information, argue that
data is different from the sort of speech the Constitution intended
to protect. But they fail to articulate a meaningful distinction
between data and other more traditional forms of expression.
Meanwhile, First Amendment scholars have not paid sufficient
attention to new technologies that automatically capture data. These
technologies reopen challenging questions about what “speech” is.
This Article makes two overdue contributions to the First Amendment
literature.
First,
it argues that when the scope of First Amendment coverage is
ambiguous, courts should analyze the government’s motive for
regulating.
Second,
it highlights and strengthens the strands of First Amendment theory
that protect the right to create knowledge.
Whenever the state
regulates in order to interfere with the creation of knowledge, that
regulation should draw First Amendment scrutiny. In combination,
these claims show clearly why data must receive First Amendment
protection. When the collection or distribution of data troubles
lawmakers, it does so because data has the potential to inform and to
inspire new opinions. Data privacy laws regulate minds, not
technology. Thus, for all practical purposes, and in every context
relevant to privacy debates, data is speech.” [Andrew Young]
Rather poorly worded if
it is okay to play Angry Birds while driving.
Court:
No-phones traffic law does not apply to apps
A California law that
bans drivers from talking on mobile phones without a hands-free
device does not bar them looking at map apps, a court has ruled.
The appeals court threw
out a traffic ticket issued to a motorist who was looking at a map on
his phone while caught in a traffic jam.
… In their
18-page decision, the 5th Appeals Court of
California said Mr Spriggs argued that "he did not violate the
statute because he was not talking on the telephone".
"We agree,"
the court wrote. "Based on the statute's language, its
legislative history, and subsequent legislative enactments, we
conclude that the statute means what it says - it prohibits a driver
only from holding a wireless telephone while conversing on it."
A separate California
law bans texting while driving.
Oops indeed!
Teen's
Facebook Post Costs Her Dad $80,000. Oops.
So Dana Snay, a Miami
teenager, is probably in big trouble right now. As
the Miami Herald
reports, an appeals court just tossed out her
father’s $80,000 age-discrimination settlement because she violated
the confidentiality agreement by bragging about it on Facebook. The
offending post:
Mama
and Papa Snay won the case against Gulliver. Gulliver is now
officially paying for my vacation to Europe this summer. SUCK IT.
… Patrick Snay had
served as headmaster for the Gulliver Preparatory School for years
when they chose not to renew his contract. He sued and settled, but
only on the condition that he and his wife keep the “terms and
existence” of the agreement private. So the infractions here were
twofold: Snay divulging the deal to his daughter and his daughter
broadcasting it to all her "friends."
Close enough that my
Ethical Hackers need this information.
Army
Field Manual for Cyber Electromagnetic Activities
by Sabrina
I. Pacifici on February 28, 2014
Via Defense One, by
Patrick Tucker - How
the Army Plans to Fight a War Across the Electromagnetic Spectrum:
“The Pentagon long has made a big effort to showcase its budding
cyberwarfare capabilities. But the military has been less
forthcoming about a key, more tangible component of cyber —
electronic warfare – until now. The Army just publically released
its first-ever Field
Manual for Cyber Electromagnetic Activities. The manual covers
operations related to cyberspace and the electromagnetic spectrum,
highlighting that for the Army electronic warfare is every bit as
important as the cyber threat we hear so much about in abstract.”
Perhaps our Intro to
Programming students might find this too amusing...
Kids
Can Learn Programming Basics With “Make Your Own Flappy Bird” In
20 Minutes
Kids have a new
incentive to learn programming. Thanks to Code.org,
they can design their own Flappy Bird game in 20 minutes. The “Make
Your Own Flappy Bird” tutorial is designed for kids as young as
six-year olds.
… The drag ‘n
drop method is excitingly kid-friendly and it is a teaching method
that has been followed successfully by graphical coding tools like
Scratch and
Blockly.
… There are also
plenty more fun
tools to get kids excited about programming.
Every week, smiles.
… The publishers
Springer and IEEE have had to
withdraw
more than 120 papers from their subscription services after a
discovery that these articles were “computer-generated nonsense.”
Or as us humanities folks call it with a smirk,
“Sokal-as-a-service.”
… There’s a
“kinda
sorta working model” of a federated OER Wiki,
brought to you by Tim Owens and Mike Caulfield. [Definitely
one to watch. Bob]
… “A Colorado
Software Firm Is Programming Your Next Professor,” reads
the headline in Forbes, a publication that never
fails to tout a technodystopian future as some sort of great business
deal. “As education costs increase, it’s not unreasonable to
think that professors, teachers, adjuncts, and tutors could at least
be partially replaced by a $7,000 programmable character who never
sleeps or unionizes, or emotionally overreacts to student behavior.”