What would happen if “the rest of the world” wouldn’t let them
reconnect? Just saying.
Russia’s
plan to unplug from the internet shows cyberwar is escalating
Russia is contemplating briefly detaching itself
from the global internet at some point in the next few months,
according to media
reports this week.
Despite appearances, the experiment isn’t a sign
of the country’s mounting isolationism, but rather part of Russia’s
efforts to test its defences against large-scale cyberattack,
presumably in the case of an increase in hostilities with either
major European powers or the US.
A discussion with my Ethical Hackers. Consider
what your lawyers will charge and all those years with no income,
just a big roommate named Bubba.
Cybercriminals
Promise Millions to Skilled Black Hats: Report
Posts
on Dark Web forums reveal that one threat actor is willing to pay in
excess of $64,000 per month ($768,000 per year) to skilled
individuals willing to help them conduct nefarious operations. The
salary would go up to $90,000 per month ($1,080,000 per year) for the
second year.
Cybercrime
groups looking for accomplices who can help them extort money from
high-worth individuals, including company executives, lawyers and
doctors, promise monthly pays starting at $30,000 per month ($360,000
per year), Digital Shadows notes in their report.
All data is useful if it helps increase sales?
Machiavellian
Mega-Chain Domino’s Wants to Trade Pizza for Data
Domino’s, the normcore
pizza chain that’s actually
America’s best food delivery startup, recently launched a
massive
data mining project masquerading as a game where people can win
free food.
… On the surface, this
might see like just another interactive stunt from Domino’s
designed to engender good will among America’s pizza-hungry masses.
But the chain is most certainly motivated by other factors beyond
merely spreading positive pizza vibes across the land. Over the last
decade, the company has masterfully used data collected from online
orders and the
various iterations of its app, as well as
third party sources, to map out local demographics and single out
the pizza competition. By harnessing the power of this data,
Domino’s is able to offer the most reliable food delivery service
across America, while also keeping prices absurdly low.
Register for access.
AI, machine
learning, and deep learning: The complete guide
Wouldn’t most people buy the most forgiving
Digital Assistant? Or perhaps there should be a “lawyer mode”
that warns you but will never reveal your conversations?
Digital
assistants should discuss whether to report illegal activity
Smart assistants could soon come with a 'moral AI'
to decide whether to report their owners for breaking the law.
That's the suggestion of academics at who say that household gadgets
like the Amazon Echo and Google
Home should be enhanced with ethical smart software.
This would let them to weigh-up whether to report
illegal activity to the police, effectively putting millions of
people under constant surveillance.
… Dr Slavkovik suggested that digital
assistants should possess an ethical awareness that simultaneously
represents both the owner and the authorities - or, in the case of a
minor, their parents.
Devices would then have an internal
'discussion' about suspect behaviour, weighing up
conflicting demands between the law and personal freedoms, before
arriving at the 'best' course of action.
A new definition of antitrust?
Facebook
Grew Too Big to Care About Privacy
Two years ago, a Yale Law School student published
what became an influential
paper about how antitrust law should apply to one of America’s
superstar technology companies, which don’t fit the conventional
mold of Standard Oil monopolists.
Now, another academic paper
from a former advertising technology executive and Yale law graduate
is arguing that Facebook Inc. abuses its power. Titled in part “The
Antitrust Case Against Facebook,” its author, Dina Srinivasan,
offers a deeply researched analysis of Facebook’s pattern of
backtracking on the user data collection that allowed the company to
become a star. Once Facebook was powerful and popular, Srinivasan
says, it was able to overrun objections about its data-harvesting
practices.
The core of Srinivasan’s argument is to treat
two anxieties about Facebook — potential abuses of monopoly power
and violations of users’ privacy — not as separate but as two
sides of the same coin. It’s a relatively novel idea that has
echoes in a recent
order from Germany’s antitrust authority. (Facebook has
said
the German regulator was wrong to link enforcement of privacy
law and antitrust, and the company said it is appealing the
decision.)
The paper was published this week in the Berkeley
Business Law Journal from the University of California,
and I read a version that has been online
for two weeks.