Reality is not shifting… (Okay, maybe a bit.)
https://www.bespacific.com/hallucinations-by-west-lexis-ai/
Hallucinations” by West & Lexis AI?
Via LLRX – Hallucinations” by West & Lexis AI? – Michael Berman addresses benchmarks used for AI legal research platforms in the context of the risk of hallucinations in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) AI outputs. As Berman states, verification, of course, is not only good advice, but also an ethical mandate.
(Related)
https://www.bespacific.com/claude-legal-is-here-and-its-worth-a-closer-look/
Claude Legal Is Here, and It’s Worth a Closer Look
Via LLRX – Claude Legal Is Here, and It’s Worth a Closer Look – With the recently launched Claude Legal plugin, Nicole L. Black recommends to lawyers and legal professionals Claude’s AI for tasks like document review and contract drafting. The Claude Legal plugin runs within Claude Cowork, a desktop app that you can download, and no specialized legal software subscription is required.
(Related)
https://www.bespacific.com/i-tested-claude-for-word-on-some-classic-litigator-tasks/
I Tested Claude for Word on Some Classic Litigator Tasks
Via LLRX – I Tested Claude for Word on Some Classic Litigator Tasks – Over the past several days Rebecca Fordon has been digging into the Claude for Word add-in, and the headline finding surprised her. On document-intensive legal work — cite-checking, consistency review, Table of Authorities assembly — it seems to need less supervision than either Claude on the web or Claude Code. Four tests bear that out, with limits worth knowing.
Suspicions confirmed.
Only 3% of traders drive prediction markets' accuracy, not the crowd, study finds
The Green Beret arrested for betting on a classified U.S. raid looked like a one-off scandal for prediction markets. A new study suggests he may be a more troubling data point: an extreme example of the small group of informed traders who, as the soldier is accused of doing, actually move prices on Polymarket, while the crowd loses money around them.
The study, part of a working paper released this week by Roberto Gómez-Cram, Yunhan Guo, Theis Ingerslev Jensen and Howard Kung of London Business School and Yale, directly tests the industry's core claim that the markets work owing to the massed knowledge of their participants.
IP is no longer secure-able?
https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/malus-clones-software-copyright
Devious New AI Tool “Clones” Software So That the Original Creator Doesn’t Hold a Copyright Over the New Version
The advent of generative AI continues to undermine the very concept of copyright, from entire books shamelessly ripping off authors to tasteless AI slop depicting beloved characters going viral on social media. The sin is foundational: all today’s popular AI tools were built by pillaging copyrighted material without permission.
Even software isn’t safe. As 404 Media reports, a new tool dubbed Malus.sh — pronounced “malice,” to give a subtle clue where this is headed — uses AI to “liberate” a piece of software from existing copyright licenses, essentially creating a “clean room” clone that technically doesn’t infringe on the original code’s copyright.
No comments:
Post a Comment