Who are we explaining it for?

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4531323

Lost in Translation: The Limits of Explainability in AI

As artificial intelligence becomes more prevalent, regulators are increasingly turning to legal measures, like “a right to explanation” to protect against potential risks raised by AI systems. However, are eXplainable AI (XAI) tools - the artificial intelligence tools that provide such explanations – up for the task?

This paper critically examines XAI’s potential to facilitate the right to explanation by applying the prism of explanation’s role in law to different stakeholders. Inspecting the underlying functions of reason-giving reveals different objectives for each of the stakeholders involved. From the perspective of a decision-subject, reason-giving facilitates due process and acknowledges human agency. From a decision-maker’s perspective, reason-giving contributes to improving the quality of the decisions themselves. From an ecosystem perspective, reason-giving may strengthen the authority of the decision-making system toward different stakeholders by promoting accountability and legitimacy, and by providing better guidance. Applying this analytical framework to XAI’s generated explanations reveals that XAI fails to fulfill the underlying objectives of the right to explanation from the perspective of both the decision-subject and the decision-maker. In contrast, XAI is found to be extremely well-suited to fulfil the underlying functions of reason-giving from an ecosystems’ perspective, namely, strengthening the authority of the decision-making system. However, lacking all other virtues, this isolated ability may be misused or abused, eventually harming XAI’s intended human audience. The disparity between human decision-making and automated decisions makes XAI an insufficient and even a risky tool, rather than serving as a guardian of human rights. After conducting a rigorous analysis of these ramifications, this paper concludes by urging regulators and the XAI community to reconsider the pursuit of explainability and the right to explanation of AI systems.

Are we ready?

https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jai/issue/77844/1318812

The Metaverse: A Brave New "World"

As we stand on the precipice of the next significant socio-technological revolution, the Metaverse promises to transform our lives as profoundly as the internet did, if not more. The Metaverse is evolving as an immersive, collaborative, and interactive digital space, of ering early glimpses of its vast potential. The scope of this digital universe extends far beyond just entertainment and gaming—it provides innovative ways to revolutionize education, business, healthcare, and finance, including burgeoning areas like cryptocurrencies. However, without establishing appropriate safeguards, the Metaverse also poses considerable challenges. The pervasive risks to privacy, security, and safety of individuals in an environment where redress mechanisms are yet undefined, are areas of concern that need urgent attention. This article defines the Metaverse, its evolution, potential benefits, and potentially harmful impact due to data privacy. Subsequently, it shares the results of a bibliographic study demonstrating that the Metaverse is becoming popular along with ethics and AI. Next, it presents the results from a global survey which suggests that the Metaverse implies cautiously optimistic tones. Moreover, the article introduces an AI-based new technology as an example between today's and tomorrow’s worlds. Based on the results, it concludes why it is important to establish educational programs and guidelines for applying the technologies in the Metaverse. Finally, it makes recommendations for new research and other actions for the entire Metaverse ecosystem.

Someone will do this first. Will that be a significant advantage?

https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202308.0308/v1

Towards Granting of Legal Personality to Autonomous Robots in the UAE

The Dubai Digital Government launched its recent guidelines, which call for artificial intelligence systems to be subject to legal accountability. This study discusses the extent to which autonomous robots can be granted legal personality in UAE law and the consistency of this approach with the provisions of Islamic jurisprudence. This research paper answered two main questions: First, the extent to which these guidelines are considered the beginning of work on granting legal personality to AI systems in the UAE. Second, what form of legal personality can be given to autonomous robots in UAE law to be consistent with the provisions of Islamic jurisprudence as a primary source of legislation in the country? The research concluded the impossibility of considering autonomous robots as a "thing" and classifying them within the concept of "persons." It also concluded that it is possible to give them legal personality according to two legislative solutions: granting them partial or incomplete performance eligibility like minors.

Perspective.

https://ijrah.com/index.php/ijrah/article/view/284

Artificial Intelligence and Mary Shelley's Frankenstein: A Comparative Analysis of Creation, Morality and Responsibility

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a revolutionary force that continues to shape various aspects of our lives. From transforming industries to redefining how we interact with machines, AI's pervasive influence has captured the collective imagination of modern society. However, as we marvel at the wonders of AI's capabilities, it becomes crucial to pause and reflect on the ethical and moral implications of creating intelligent machines. Mary Shelley's magnum opus, "Frankenstein," published nearly two centuries ago, remains an enduring cautionary tale about the perils of unchecked ambition and the consequences of playing god. The narrative of Victor Frankenstein's relentless pursuit of creating life, only to be haunted by the unforeseen horrors of his creation, has resonated across generations. This tale of hubris, moral dilemmas, and the intricate relationships between creator and creation continues to transcend time, finding a striking resonance in contemporary discussions on AI and its potential implications. The research article endeavors to delve into the parallels between AI and "Frankenstein," unraveling the profound ethical dilemmas faced by AI developers, policymakers, and society at large. By drawing upon the cautionary lessons embedded within Shelley's classic tale, we aim to extract timeless wisdom that can guide us in the responsible and humane development of AI technologies. While AI holds the potential to revolutionize our lives positively, the dark echoes of Victor Frankenstein's missteps serve as a stark reminder of the need for ethical frameworks and interdisciplinary collaboration to ensure that AI remains a powerful force for good.

Onea these days…

https://www.makeuseof.com/write-ebook-in-30-days-guide/

How to Write an Ebook in 30 Days: A Step-by-Step Guide

While writing an ebook in 30 days isn't practical for everyone, it's definitely possible with the right tools and motivation. This article will introduce a plan for how to write an ebook in 30 days, with the preparation, editing, and formatting accounted for separately to better your chances of success.