Interesting (and careful)
wording.
Clinton
email probe finds no deliberate mishandling of classified information
A
U.S. State Department investigation of Hillary Clinton's use of a
private email server while she was secretary of state has found no
evidence of deliberate mishandling of classified information by
department employees.
The
investigation, the results of which were released on Friday by
Republican U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley's office, centered on whether
Clinton, who served as the top U.S. diplomat from 2009 to 2013,
jeopardized classified information by using a private email server
rather than a government one.
The
investigation did find that Clinton's use of a private server
increased the risk of hacking.
…
Then-FBI Director James Comey
announced five months before the November 2016 election that no
charges would be filed against Clinton, but he found her actions
"extremely careless."
Making
AI understandable. A shame we didn’t do that before using it.
Can
you make AI fairer than a judge? Play our courtroom algorithm game
…
increasingly, algorithms have
begun to arbitrate fairness for us. They decide who sees housing
ads, who gets hired or fired, and even who gets sent to jail.
Consequently, the people who create them—software engineers—are
being asked to articulate what it means to be fair in their code.
This is why regulators around the world are now grappling with a
question: How can you mathematically quantify fairness?
This
story attempts to offer an answer. And to do so, we need your help.
We’re going to walk through a real algorithm, one used to decide
who gets sent to jail, and ask you to tweak its various parameters to
make its outcomes more fair. (Don’t worry—this won’t involve
looking at code!)
Does
explainable AI preclude copyright?
Copyright
Law and Artificial Intelligence
Artificial
intelligence (AI) has become one of the hottest topics in more or
less all legal areas, be it liability, criminal law, legal tech, or
even agricultural law. Hence, it is no surprise that AI also raises
issues in copyright law, mainly concerning two different questions.
The first refers to the creation of works with the help of AI, the
second deals with copyright protection of AI itself.
…
In copyright law, AI raises the
question whether works created by it can still be regarded as a
personal intellectual creation, which is crucial for acknowledging
copyright protection for a work.
…
The other relevant aspect from a
copyright law perspective concerns the protection of AI itself.
Under the current legal framework, it is not AI as a concept or as an
algorithm that is protected, rather it is AI as a code on the grounds
of the EU Software Directive.
Compare
and contrast. India vs
TikTok
makes education push in India
…
TkTok, owned by the world’s
most valued startup Bytedance, said it’s working with a number of
content creators and firms in India to populate the platform with
educational videos.
These
bite-sized clips cover a range of topics, from school-level science
and math
concepts to learning new languages.
The social app is also featuring videos that offer tips on health
and mental awareness, and motivational talks.
(Relared)
The US
High
Schools to TikTok: We’re Catching Feelings
On
the wall of a classroom that is home to the
West Orange High School TikTok club,
large loopy words are scrawled across a whiteboard: “Wanna be
TikTok famous? Join TikTok club.”
It’s
working. “There’s a lot of TikTok-famous kids at our school,”
said Amanda DiCastro, who is 14 and a freshman. “Probably 20
people have gotten famous off random things.”
… Amanda
was referring to a different kind of notoriety: on TikTok, a social
media app where users post short funny videos, usually set to
music, that is enjoying a surge in popularity among teenagers around
the world and has been downloaded 1.4 billion times, according to
SensorTower.
The
embrace of the app at this school is mirrored on scattered campuses
across the United States, where students are forming TikTok clubs to
dance, sing and perform skits for the app — essentially
drama clubs for the digital age, but with the potential to
reach huge audiences.
Question:
Radar as in microwave radiation?
What's
the deal with radar on a phone anyway?
Google's
new
Pixel
4 represents
the first time that radar has appeared on any mobile phone. On the
Pixel 4, it powers a motion sensor that Google uses to drive a suite
of features, including
gestures to control the device hands-free,
and faster face unlock (but there's a big caveat here). Google aptly
calls the sensor Motion Sense.
… Google
says that its technology uses a 60GHz radio frequency, doesn't travel
very far and has passed all requisite safety requirements.
Usefulness
/ cost = No Brainer
No comments:
Post a Comment