Tuesday, October 16, 2018

I like to keep my students aware of common security failures.
Weibrecht Law in New Hampshire recently submitted a notification to their state with this explanation of their breach:
On or about Monday September 10th, our office sent an unencrypted electronic copy (“thumb drive”) of a client file via US Postal Service. The envelope that the thumb drive was sent in was received by the recipient, damaged and without the thumb drive enclosed. We immediately contacted the USPS to investigate.
Okay, so far that sounds really familiar, right, although why entities would still send unencrypted thumb drives thru postal mail in 2018 is a bit disheartening. In any event, their report continues (with emphasis added by me):
A representative from our office spoke with a representative in the Claims and Inquiries Department of the USPS in Manchester, NH and learned that all items recovered from the mail processing center are sent to her department. She reported that because this was a common occurrence, she had several buckets of thumb drives that had similarly been torn free from their envelope in the mail sorting process.
Buckets of thumb drives? The possibilities are staggering.
She did a visual review for the USB but did not find it. She also reported that the USPS has its own internal privacy policies that would preclude an employee from actually opening any of the USBs that are recovered.
And we know that employees always rigorously adhere to policies, right?
Based on this information, we do not have reason to believe the information has been accessed by individuals intending to misuse it. In fact, our investigation indicates that the most likely disposition of the thumb drive was that it was destroyed in a post office mail processing machine.
Complete the “write your own misdadventure” starter above.
The law firm has taken steps to provide protective and remediation services and is changing their procedures for sending files, but how much time, money, and potential reputation harm could they have avoided by encrypting files during file transfer?
These lessons are so costly and painful for SMB. I wish we could help more entities avoid having to learn them.




Another common failure and a proper response.
Madison County computer system infected with ransomware
Madison County in Idaho fell victim to a ransomware attack last week, after an employee opened a phishing email asking for money. The IT department spent the week recovering the computer system from the attack, which took place over the three-day Columbus Day weekend.
The entire county network was affected, including payroll systems, sanitation services and the treasurer’s office, making it difficult for officials to conduct business operations. Employees couldn’t send emails and had to use backup data to issue paychecks.
… County Commissioner Brent Mendenhall and Madison County Clerk Kim Muir said they will not pay the ransom and, because the IT department had made backups, they were able to successfully restore the system.




Is this really cheaper than good security?
Insurer Anthem will pay record $16M for massive data breach
The nation’s second-largest health insurer has agreed to pay the government a record $16 million to settle potential privacy violations in the biggest known health care hack in U.S. history, officials said Monday.
The personal information of nearly 79 million people — including names, birthdates, Social Security numbers and medical IDs — was exposed in the cyberattack, discovered by the company in 2015.
The settlement between Anthem Inc. and the Department of Health and Human Services represents the largest amount collected by the agency in a health care data breach, officials said.




Cause and effect.
The Employer Surveillance State
“…In fact, electronic surveillance of employees, through technologies including not just video cameras but also monitoring software, has grown rapidly across all industries. Randolph Lewis, a professor of American Studies at the University of Texas at Austin and the author of Under Surveillance, Being Watched in Modern America, pointed to software that makes it possible for employers to monitor employee facial expressions and tone of voice to gauge their emotional states, such as rage or frustration. Among more conventional surveillance methods, employers can track employees’ website visits, and keep tabs on their employees’ keystrokes. Employers can also monitor employees’ personal blogs, and read their social-networking profiles. In one case in California, a sales executive at a money-transfer firm sued her employer, claiming she had been fired for disabling an app that used employer-issued cell phones to track workers via GPS, even when they were off the clock. (The suit was later settled out of court.) The proliferation of surveillance is due, at least in part, to the rising sophistication and declining cost of spy technology: Employers monitor workers because they can. Michel Anteby, a Boston University sociologist and business scholar who has watched how monitoring impacts employees at the TSA and other workplaces, has also noticed that the more employees are surveyed, the harder they try to avoid being watched, and the harder management tries to watch them. “Most TSA workers we observed do everything possible to stay under the radar, to essentially disappear,” he said. “They try to never speak up, never stick out, do nothing that might get noticed by management,” he said. “This leads to a vicious cycle, whereby management grows more suspicious and feels justified in ratcheting up the surveillance.”




“People? We don’t listen to no stinking people!”
Study: Nearly all unique comments to FCC opposed net neutrality repeal
… Singel discovered that of the 800,000 unique comments posted, 99.7 percent were in favor of net neutrality. His findings were released Monday and first reported by Motherboard.
The report, entitled “Filtering Out the Bots: What Americans Actually Told the FCC about Net Neutrality Repeal," showed that Americans were well-informed on what net neutrality is and made their feelings clear, Singel wrote in a blog post Monday.




My young students don’t know this. My international students don’t know what a “Sears” is. Sad.
Opinion | How Sears Was the Amazon of Its Day
The orders poured in from everywhere — 105,000 a day at one point — so much so that the company became an economic force. It could make or break suppliers by promoting their products. It could dictate terms on manufacturing. Its headquarters city boomed as this tech-driven retailer built huge warehouses and factories and attracted other businesses and rivals. State and local governments complained that the company was harming small-town retailers.
That was Sears, Roebuck & Company in the early 20th century in Chicago.
… Sears became the Amazon of its day because its co-founder Richard Warren Sears harnessed two great networks to serve his enterprise — the railroads and the United States Postal Service. When the Postal Service commenced rural free delivery in 1896 (the “last mile” in today’s jargon) every homestead in America became within reach.
And Richard Sears reached them. He used his genius for advertising and promotion to put a catalog in the hands of 20 million Americans in 1900, when the population was 76 million. The Wish Book […] could run a staggering 1,500 pages and offer more than 100,000 items.




Sounds interesting.
For the Love of Lit - Four Free Webinars for ELA Teachers
This week PBS Education is hosting the first webinar in a four part virtual professional development series called For the Love of Lit. This series features free webinars designed to help ELA teachers engage their students in learning about literature.
The four webinars in the series are as follows:
  • Inspiring Young Authors, with NaNoWriMo founder Chris Baty
  • Including All Readers, with student activist Marley Dias
  • Encouraging Bright Thinkers
  • Cultivating Young Book Lovers
You can register for one or all four registers right here. PD certificates are available for attending each session.




Oh, the horror!
Climate change to double costs of making beer, scientists say


No comments: