Friday, October 19, 2018

Cutting edge. Perhaps it cut the security as well.
West Virginia's voting experiment stirs security fears
West Virginia is about to take a leap of faith in voting technology — but it could put people's ballots at risk.
Next month, it will become the first state to deploy a smartphone app in a general election, allowing hundreds of overseas residents and members of the military stationed abroad to cast their ballots remotely. And the app will rely on blockchain, the same buzzy technology that underpins bitcoin, in yet another Election Day first.
… But cybersecurity and election integrity advocates say West Virginia is setting an example of all the things states shouldn’t do when it comes to securing their elections, an already fraught topic given fears that Russian operatives are trying again to tamper with U.S. democracy.
… Voting integrity advocates are in overall agreement about the best way to secure elections, and they have pressed states to stick with technology that includes auditable paper trails — even suing Georgia over that issue. They’ve urged the Department of Homeland Security to advise states against having modems in voting machines. And they have pressed the government to warn state election officials against any kind of online voting.
… “Why is blockchain voting a dumb idea?” University of Pennsylvania cybersecurity expert Matt Blaze tweeted in August. “Glad you asked. For starters: - It doesn't solve any problems civil elections actually have. - It's basically incompatible with ‘software independence’, considered an essential property - It can make ballot secrecy difficult or impossible.”




Propaganda based on facts, not promises?
New Method, Same Strategy: Russia Has Long Exploited U.S. Racial Divisions
As the country prepares for the first national election since evidence emerged of the Russian government’s interference in the presidential race two years ago, it is worth recalling that the 2016 election was not the first time that Russia intervened in U.S. politics. Recent Russian operations used American racism to stoke divisions in our society. More than half of the Facebook advertisements created by the Kremlin-backed Internet Research Agency (IRA) to influence Americans around the 2016 presidential election referenced race. While the use of social media is new, Russia has a long history of highlighting the conflict between American ideals of equality and the reality of racial injustice in this country. This history provides important context as the U.S. grapples with how to respond to the continued threat of Russian government interference in our democracy.




A state-sponsored bot net? Easy to implement. Why didn’t Facebook block this? New techniques to avoid detection...
Exclusive: Twitter pulls down bot network that pushed pro-Saudi talking points about disappeared journalist
Twitter suspended a network of suspected Twitter bots on Thursday that pushed pro-Saudi Arabia talking points about the disappearance of journalist Jamal Khashoggi in the past week.
Twitter became aware of some of the bots on Thursday when NBC News presented the company with a spreadsheet of hundreds of accounts that tweeted and retweeted the same pro-Saudi government tweets at the same time.
… Saudi Arabia has widely embraced social media. A study by Crowd Analyzer, an Arabic-focused social media analysis firm, found that there were 11 million active Twitter users in the country.
The bot accounts pushed messages over the weekend imploring users to express doubt about news stories reporting that Khashoggi was killed at the Saudi consulate in Turkey on Oct. 2 at the order of the Saudi government, as Turkish officials have alleged.
… Russell found the accounts by analyzing a trove of Twitter data and finding accounts that were created on the same date and had similar numbers of followers, tweets and likes. From there, he compiled a list of hundreds of accounts that tweeted identical tweets at the same time.
He called the influence operation a “standard” bot network, but was surprised at how old some of these accounts are.
“There were some that were from 2011, some from 2014,” he said. “For a bot to sit out there on Twitter for that long is kind of shocking.”


(Related)
Facebook has a fake news 'war room' – but is it really working?
… One study, however, found that out of 50 of the most widely shared political images on WhatsApp in the lead-up to the election in Brazil, only 8% were considered fully truthful, and many were false, misleading or unsubstantiated. There has also been a growing problem of fake news videos, which don’t face the same scrutiny as articles.
… The new political ad moderation system has also had major hiccups. Hours after the briefing, USA Today published a report showing that Facebook had removed ads after incorrectly labeling them “political”, simply because they used descriptions like “African-American” and “Mexican” or were written in Spanish.




Not bad! Some very simple and clear definitions.
FPF Release: The Privacy Expert’s Guide to AI And Machine Learning
Today, FPF announces the release of The Privacy Expert’s Guide to AI and Machine Learning. This guide explains the technological basics of AI and ML systems at a level of understanding useful for non-programmers, and addresses certain privacy challenges associated with the implementation of new and existing ML-based products and services.


No comments: