Russian ‘Dukes’ of Hackers Pounce on Trump Win
Less than six hours after Donald Trump became the
presumptive president-elect of the United States, a Russian hacker gang perhaps
best known for breaking into computer networks at the Democratic National
Committee launched a volley of targeted phishing campaigns
against American political think-tanks and non-government organizations (NGOs).
… Volexity reports in a blog post published Thursday
morning.
… “Two of the
attacks purported to be messages forwarded on from the Clinton Foundation
giving insight and perhaps a postmortem analysis into the elections,” Adair
wrote.” Two of the other attacks
purported to be eFax links or documents pertaining to the election’s outcome
being revised or rigged. The last attack
claimed to be a link to a PDF download on “Why American Elections Are
Flawed.”
Was the insurance company on the hook for other costs if
they didn’t pay the ransom?
Well, this is interesting: a media report says that a
county’s insurer advised them to pay a
ransomware demand. Ken de la
Bastide reports:
On the advice of their insurance
company Madison County officials are moving forward to pay the ransom demands
by a unknown group that attacked the county’s computer system.
Madison County was hit by a
ransomware attack over the weekend that prevented access to county records.
The malware attack has not
affected the election where the voting registration records are maintained on a
separate computer server.
[…]
The amount of the ransom is not
being provided by the commissioners, but Travelers Insurance, the county’s
insurance carrier, will reimburse a portion of the cost, less the county’s
deductible.
Read more on the Washington
Times Herald.
[From the
article:
Lisa Cannon, director of the county’s IT department, said the county will
make sure the system is secure before new data is placed in the system.“We’re in the process of adding a backup system,” she said.
… Lyons said her
employees were taking either vacation or personal time off.
“Without
the computer system there could be no work done,” Lyons said. “We have to access all our information on the
computers.”
Crazy crazy or crazy cool?
Social engineering on a national scale?
Mark Zuckerberg Says Fake News on Facebook Affecting the
Election Is a 'Crazy Idea'
A lot of questions are emerging about Facebook’s role in
this year’s election cycle, especially given the proliferation of sensationalistic
and even outright fake news stories, and CEO Mark Zuckerberg has responded.
“I think the idea that fake news on Facebook—of which it’s
a very small amount of the content—influenced the election in any way is a
pretty crazy idea,” he said on Thursday at the Techonomy conference in Half
Moon Bay, Calif.
Technology for the next election?
Inside Donald Trump’s Data Analytics Team on Election Night
At a little past 9:30 p.m. Tuesday, the head of a little-known
data analytics team working for Donald Trump in San Antonio sent a flurry of
messages to the campaign’s New York war room: Florida had tipped and the models
were predicting a more than 50% chance he would win the presidency.
Until then, the number-crunching and analytics for Mr.
Trump felt more like a “data experiment,” said Matthew Oczkowski, head of
product at Cambridge Analytica, who led the team for nearly six months.
… It is too early
to assess the full impact Cambridge Analytica had on the Trump campaign. While its advice aided the campaign in
targeting ads, some of its polling predictions, like those from most survey
firms, were off.
On Monday, Cambridge Analytica gave Mr. Trump less than a
30% chance of winning. “So many states
were close to the margin of error that it could swing either way,” Mr.
Oczkowski explained.
But the unexpected win is likely to bring new attention to
the company’s psychological approach, in
which it used reams of information about voters harvested from databases, the
internet and field operatives.
“We thought we knew what we were doing, but now we think
we don’t.”
Concern about data security derails plan to expand PreCheck
The agency for a year had been working through a
solicitation to bring on additional private companies to beef up the PreCheck
application network as it works toward the Department of Homeland Security's
goal of enrolling 25 million people in trusted-traveler programs (PreCheck and
Global Entry) by 2019. At present,
PreCheck enrollment is close to 4 million, TSA says.
In late October, however, the TSA withdrew the
solicitation, citing "the increased and evolving cybersecurity risks over
the past year.
… Increasing
enrollment in PreCheck is a goal of both the TSA and travel industry advocates,
who cite the efficiency and safety
enhancements [Like what? Bob]
that trusted-traveler programs bring to airport security checkpoints. PreCheck members move more quickly through
screening lines than other travelers because they don't have to remove shoes,
jackets or belts, or take laptops out of carry-on bags.
Anti-outsourcing? “Keep
our citizens in our jurisdiction.”
After LinkedIn Ban, Russia Warns Facebook And Twitter
Russia has for the first time invoked its ban on websites
storing personal data outside the country. It’s picked a high-profile target, LinkedIn –
and says even bigger companies could be next on the list.
According to local media, a court has upheld a complaint
by regulator Roskomnadzor, which says that LinkedIn has failed to satisfy its
concerns. Indeed, according to local
news agency TASS, the company hasn’t even been in touch since the ruling was
announced yesterday.
… Since the law
came into effect in September last year, Russia has audited more than 1,500
companies to make sure they comply, gaining agreement from Google, eBay,
Booking.com and other Western firms.
More on outsourcing.
(Interesting that California is the starting point.)
A CIO rejects, for now, university’s IT offshoring plan
There are reservations within the University of California
system about a plan to move IT work offshore and lay off employees.
No comments:
Post a Comment