Strange, since the FBI loves publicity.
Sam Biddle reports:
In
the summer of 2014, anonymous hackers flooded the internet with
private nude photos of major (and minor) celebrities. Two years
later, new details show the FBI thinks they identified Jennifer
Lawrence’s hacker. But no one’s facing charges.
[…]… court documents obtained by Gawker, including a search warrant and sworn affidavit, show that the FBI had another suspect in the breaches. In October of 2014, the FBI fingered Ed Majerczyk, another Chicago man with a similar laundry list of cloud-based invasions.
Read more on Gawker.
[From
the article:
As in the case of the other guy accused of
pilfering celebrity nudes via iCloud, large questions remain
unanswered. Why would a prolific nude robber savvy enough to hijack
celebrity accounts en masse not take simple precautions to protect
his IP address? Even more puzzling: Why has this investigation gone
completely quiet? An FBI spokesperson would not comment on whether
either man is a suspect or person of interest, replying only that
“it’s a pending investigation” and that they have “not been
made aware of any public developments.” This is the same line I
was read nearly a year ago—there have been no arrests associated
with this case.
Even acquiring these court documents was more
difficult than usual. The entire docket had at first been placed
under seal indefinitely to give the FBI time to comb over seized
computers and hard drives, which is routine. But they remained under
seal, without explanation, only to be placed under “restricted
access” and unavailable to anyone not inside the Northern District
of Illinois courthouse. Only after a long exchange with the
courthouse was I able to procure the court docket—and the
investigation remains nearly as opaque as it was in 2014.
Probably simpler to list agencies that do not want
the data. Similar to the US list? Probably.
Gone
are the days of keeping things to ourselves – now it is literally
as if Big Brother is watching us at every turn. This afternoon the
Federal Government has released a list of more than 60 federal, state
and local government agencies that have applied to access metadata of
Australians.
The list, released under Freedom of Information laws, showed agencies that have sought to access telecommunications data without a warrant.
Shockingly, as well as numerous federal departments, requests were also made by Harness Racing NSW, Australia Post, Roads and Maritime Service NSW and RSPCA VIC.
Read more on Starts
at 60.
What we need is someone familiar with both Privacy
law and Anti-trust. Fortunately, Prof. Soma at DU's Sturm College of
Law is a perfect fit. (and I've been training him for years!)
European
Union to Scrutinize Usage of Big Data by Large Internet Companies
The European Union is considering whether the way
large Internet companies, such as Alphabet Inc.’s Google or
Facebook Inc.,
collect vast quantities of data is in breach of antitrust rules,
the bloc’s competition chief said Sunday.
“If a company’s use of data is so bad for
competition that it outweighs the benefits, we may have to step in to
restore a level playing field,” said Margrethe Vestager, European
Commissioner for Competition, according to a text of her speech
delivered at the Digital Life Design conference in Munich, Germany.
“We continue to look carefully at this issue,”
she said, adding that while no competition problems have yet been
found in this area, “this certainly doesn’t mean we never will”
find them in the future.
Her comments highlight the increased focus that
regulators give to the use of so-called big
data—large sets of personal information that are increasingly
important for digital businesses, even though people generally hand
over the information voluntarily when they use free services.
… “But if just a few companies control the
data you need to satisfy customers and cut costs, that could give
them the power to drive their rivals out of the market,” Ms.
Vestager said.
… Ms. Vestager said the commission would be
careful to differentiate between different types of data, since some
forms of information can become obsolete quickly, making concerns of
market dominance moot.
She also said the EU would look into why some
companies can’t acquire information that is as useful as the data
that other competing firms have.
“What’s to stop them [companies] from
collecting the same data from their customers, or buying it from a
data-analytics company?” she said.
… Ms. Vestager also said she would publish a
preliminary report in the middle of the year, as the next
formal step in an investigation into whether Internet commerce
companies, such as Amazon.com
Inc., are violating
antitrust rules by restricting cross-border trade.
(Related) Is this the real concern?
Netflix’s
Global Growth Faces New Threats
When Netflix
Inc. won rights to premiere
gothic TV drama “Penny Dreadful” in several European countries,
local media companies that lost out were miffed.
They were growing increasingly frustrated that the
streaming juggernaut is scooping up exclusive rights to top shows as
it pursues an aggressive global expansion, locking them out in their
home markets. It was time to mount a response.
Shortly after the “Penny Dreadful” deal in
late 2014, senior executives at French pay-television group Canal
Plus and rival operator Sky
PLC met to discuss jointly bidding for TV shows, a way to counter
Netflix, people familiar with the discussions say.
Have we come full circle? Humans no longer write
cursive so we have machines do it for us? (Will the recipient have a
machine that can read cursive?)
With This
Startup, a Handwritten Thank You Note Is a Click Away
… There’s just something about someone
actually taking the time to personally write and mail something that
carries more weight that an email or text would, says Lizzie Post, an
author and spokesperson for the Emily
Post Institute, an organization that provides advice on
etiquette. For that reason, there’s been more of an emphasis on
the gesture.
… Think of someone you’d like to send a
thank you to, go to bond.co or use its mobile service, write out the
message, pick out some stationary and a handwriting style (or use
your own), submit the note with the name and address of the person
you want to send it to and when it should be delivered and you're
done.
… At $3.50 a note or about $2 or $2.50 for
businesses with larger orders, Bond’s services are quick, easy and
accessible. Another invitation-only service, Bond Black, offers
concierge service to clients through a mobile app, able to send notes
in their own handwriting on custom stationery for $1,200 a year.
The majority of clientele are from people in
business, ranging from CEOs of large Fortune 500 companies,
real-estate brokers or startups founders.
Useful for documenting processes? (It doesn't
have to be a failure.)
Try This
Built-In Windows Tool to Record System Issues
PC problems would be easier to solve if the person
helping you troubleshoot them remotely understood your descriptions
of the problems. Why don’t you show him what’s really
going on with your PC instead of telling him.
The Problem Steps Recorder (PSR) is here to help
you do just that. This tool is a screen
recording utility that you can find in Windows
7 and above. To access it, search for psr in
the Windows search bar. Once launched, hit the Start Record
button and go about recreating the steps that lead up to the system
issue or error that you’re experiencing.
The tool won’t record your keystrokes though, so
you’ll have to add any necessary comments along the way using the
Add Comment button.
No comments:
Post a Comment