How
many of these will we see? Does JPMorgan know what happened to it?
Julia
O’Donoghue reports:
The personal information of Louisiana residents could be at risk
because of another data breach involving state-issued debit cards.
JPMorgan Chase has notified Louisiana’s government
that someone had broken through the company’s security system and
the personal information of residents using debit cards provided by
three state agencies could be exposed. People who may be affected
include those who receive their tax refunds, child support or
unemployment benefits on a prepaid debit card issued by the state.
Read
more on NOLA.com
[From
the article:
"The
company said it does not know if or to what extent information on
Louisiana citizens may have been exposed," said Byron Henderson,
communications director for the Louisiana Department of Revenue.
I
suspect we'll see a change in how insurance coverage is written...
Joshua
Mooney of White and Williams discusses court rulings involving
insurance coverage for data breaches:
…. General liability policies are the most popular candidate. The
policies define “personal and advertising injury” in part as
injury arising out of “oral or written publication, in any manner,
of material that violates a person’s right of privacy,” as in ISO
Form CG 00 01 12 07, Section V.17. Whether a data breach implicates
personal and advertising injury coverage thus depends upon whether
there has been a “publication” that violates the “right of
privacy.” Easy? Well, no. These issues are not always
straightforward.
You
can read his article on The
Legal Intelligencer, where he reviews a number of relevant court
cases. As Mooney discusses, “The issue of whether data breaches
involve a violation of a right of privacy has been litigated less.”
Gosh,
it might be useful if the judge knew of a PrivacyFoundation.org
that didn't have this fault (and was extremely good at managing it's
money!)
The
proposed $8.5 million settlement in In re Google Referrer Header
Privacy Litigation may not be approved. Joel Rosenblatt
reports:
Google Inc. (GOOG)’s settlement of a privacy lawsuit probably won’t
win approval because it includes a donation to an Internet research
center at Harvard University and to other schools
that attorneys who brought the case attended, a judge
said.
U.S. District Judge Edward Davila voiced his concerns at a hearing
today in San Jose, California, over the settlement of a suit claiming
the company transferred personal information contained in user
searches to third parties including marketers and data brokers.
Read
more on Bloomberg.
Privacy
organizations had objected to the settlement, as John M. Simpson of
Consumer Watchdog explains
in discussing yesterday’s hearing.
Interesting.
Might be useful for some politicians I know.
Visualization
of US data on race and income
by
Sabrina I.
Pacifici on Aug 29, 2014
“Visualize
race and income data for your community, county, and country.
Includes tools for data journalists, bloggers and community
activists.”
You
can't make this stuff up!
…
Late last week, several LA news
organizations obtained
and published emails between LAUSD,
Apple,
and Pearson
officials. The emails reveal that Superintendent
John Deasy began
meeting with these companies to discuss the hardware/curriculum
purchase almost a year before the multimillion dollar contract went
out to bid.
The district agreed last year to purchase 700,000 iPads — one for
every student in the district. The devices would come pre-loaded
with curriculum created by Pearson. The expected cost of this
project, including upgrades to the district’s WiFi: over $1
billion.
Following
the release of the emails — alongside a highly
critical report from the district technology committee, Deasy
announced he would cancel
the contract with Apple. The district will reopen the bidding
process.
No
surprise, the ongoing saga is this week’s “What
You Should Know This Week” over on EML.
Oh
and bonus: now the district says that an audit has found it is
missing
$2 million in computers, mostly iPads. Oops.
…
The judge in Vergara
v California affirmed
his decision this week (that is, five state statures governing
teacher employment, tenure,
and seniority
are unconstitutional as
they deny students access to a quality public education). Defendants
now have 60 days to file an appeal.
…
A judge in Texas
has affirmed
his decision that the state’s school
funding model
is unconstitutional.
Apparently I get older (and more out of touch) every year.
Beloit Mindset List
For
my forgetful students. Android
–
intelligently locks and unlocks your phone for you. Just drop your
phone in your pocket and it locks. Pocket Lock keeps your phone
locked until you take it out, then it unlocks, allowing for easy use
and preventing accidental activity in your pocket. Pocket Lock is
great for phones with broken power buttons or flip cases.
(Related)
...and here's a bunch of free and low cost Apps & games.
Grid
Diary & Swipe Input Are Free, Dragon Quest VIII Also On Sale [iOS
Sales]
Numerical:
Calculator Without Equal ($2.99, now free)
No comments:
Post a Comment