Ask yourself how data
gathering for “Behavioral Advertising” differs from data
gathering for “detecting terrorists.”
Bruce Schneier writes:
If
you’ve been reading the news recently, you might think that
corporate America is doing its best to thwart NSA surveillance.
Google
just announced
that it is encrypting Gmail when you access it from your computer or
phone, and between data centers. Last week, Mark Zuckerberg
personally
called President Obama to complain about the NSA using Facebook
as a means to hack computers, and Facebook’s Chief Security Officer
explained
to reporters that the attack technique has not worked since last
summer. Yahoo, Google, Microsoft, and others are now regularly
publishing “transparency
reports,” listing approximately how many government data
requests the companies have received and complied with.
On
the government side, last week the NSA’s General Counsel Rajesh De
seemed to have thrown those companies under a bus by stating
that — despite their denials — they knew all about the NSA’s
collection of data under both the PRISM program and some unnamed
“upstream” collections on the communications links.
Yes,
it may seem like the the public/private
surveillance partnership has frayed — but, unfortunately, it is
alive and well. The main focus of massive Internet
companies and government agencies both still largely align:
to keep us all under constant surveillance. When they bicker, it’s
mostly role-playing designed to keep us blasé about what’s really
going on.
Read more on Schneier
on Security.
Surely this information
is in the literature? Google uses a program for extracting
Behavioral Advertising data from emails. Couldn't that be modified
to look for specific evidence?
Ryan Abbott reports:
A
federal judge denied
another search-and-seizure warrant application for an iPhone because
the government can’t explain how it will avoid
snagging information falling outside the scope of the warrant.
U.S.
Magistrate Judge John Facciola, who last week denied four
applications for search-and-seizure warrants for child pornography,
also denied the government’s most recent request to search an
iPhone 4S.
“Specifically,
the government fails to articulate how it will limit the possibility
that data outside the scope of the warrant will be searched,”
Facciola wrote in the ruling.
Read more on Courthouse
News.
Something to meditate
on?
Automated
ethics
When is it ethical
to hand our decisions over to machines? And when is external
automation a step too far?
… If your vehicle
encounters a busload of schoolchildren skidding across the road, do
you want to live in a world where it automatically swerves, at a
speed you could never have managed, saving them but putting your life
at risk? Or would you prefer to live in a world where it doesn’t
swerve but keeps you safe? Put like this, neither seems a tempting
option. Yet designing self-sufficient systems demands that we
resolve such questions.
I can fold paper, but
it just looks like folded paper.
How
To Make Your Own Papercraft Millenium Falcon
We’ve shown you how
to make papercraft
figurines of Obi-Wan Kenobi, R2-D2 and other Star Wars characters
but today, things get a little more exciting. We’ll share
instructions on how to make your very own papercraft Millenium
Falcon. This is slightly more advanced stuff than the Cubeecraft
models we’re shared in the past, but it’s well worth the time
and effort.
Here are the templates
and instructions.
No comments:
Post a Comment