A question for the lawyers or the
insurers?
AU:
Hackers’ extortion bid on schools
December 16, 2012 by admin
I don’t recall ever seeing an media
report on an extortion/ransom attempt on a school, but here’s a
case out of Australia, where they also seem to have more media
reports of ransomware in the healthcare and small business sectors
than we do. As reported by the Herald
Sun:
Schools have
emerged as a new cybercrime battleground, after a north coast
community school had its records seized by hackers.
Byron
Bay Community School had its student records and
accounts seized by hackers who demanded payment in return for access
to files.
Police advised the
school not to pay up and the NSW Police Cybercrime squad is
investigating the attempted extortion.
Are market forces at work here, too?
Do hackers demand as much from schools as from medical practices or
businesses? The paper doesn’t disclose the amount demanded, but
the problem of ransomware seems to be mushrooming
globally.
...but you knew that. Didn't you?
Not everyone is ignoring the mentally
ill, although I don't think this is the best way to do it....
"The Westboro Baptist Church
stated earlier this week that they
would be picketing the funerals of the
victims of Newtown Connecticut's tragic shooting in an effort to
bring awareness to their hate messages. In response, the Anonymous
hacker collective has
hacked their website and posted the
personal information of all of its members."
Using this model, what other industries
are dead or dying?
December 16, 2012
Post
Industrial Journalism: Adapting to the Present
Post
Industrial Journalism: Adapting to the Present,
a report by C.W. Anderson, Emily Bell, Clay Shirky. Columbia
Journalism School, Tow Center for Digital Journalism
- "This essay is part survey and part manifesto, one that concerns itself with the practice of journalism and the practices of journalists in the United States. It is not, however, about “the future of the news industry,” both because much of that future is already here and because there is no such thing as the news industry anymore. There used to be one, held together by the usual things that hold an industry together: similarity of methods among a relatively small and coherent group of businesses, and an inability for anyone outside that group to produce a competitive product. Those conditions no longer hold true. If you wanted to sum up the past decade of the news ecosystem in a single phrase, it might be this: Everybody suddenly got a lot more freedom. The newsmakers, the advertisers, the startups, and, especially, the people formerly known as the audience have all been given new freedom to communicate, narrowly and broadly, outside the old strictures of the broadcast and publishing models. The past 15 years have seen an explosion of new tools and techniques, and, more importantly, new assumptions and expectations, and these changes have wrecked the old clarity."
Talking points for the coming debate...
“Gun”
“Control”
Please note that this is a post
about technology, not politics.
… What is a gun? A barrel is not a
gun, nor is a stock, or a sight, or a trigger. But at some point you
put these and a few other objects together and you have a gun. As it
turns out, strictly speaking, the receiver is how such things end up
being defined in this country, at least as a rule of thumb. Buying,
selling, and creating the receiver, into which a cartridge passes
from the magazine and is prepared for discharge, is buying, selling,
and creating a gun.
You may have read that there is already
a 3D model of an AR receiver that can be printed, combined with other
parts, and turned into a working firearm. The most recent news on
that front was such a gun failing after firing just six rounds,
leading to no small amount of derision online regarding the
possibility of printed guns.
This allows people to ignore the issue,
since if they aren’t making real guns, it’s not a real
problem. In fact, some reading this probably consider the issue a
little silly.
This skepticism is misplaced for two
reasons.
First, the problem is strictly
technical, and the team that made the gun was already analyzing and
correcting for the problem by the end of the day. If they had a
high-quality printer, they could have the improved part overnight,
which is a capability that is changing other industries as well.
Second, the problem is not a problem.
They created a working firearm. In World War II, the U.S.
manufactured one million FP-45 Liberator handguns. These crude,
single-shot pistols were designed to be dropped from the air by the
thousand over occupied territory, to give the resistance there the
advantage of a firearm, be it only for one shot. The fundamental
difference was not between six shots and a hundred shots, but between
zero shots and any shots at all.
A 3D-printed gun, were it only to fire
one shot before melting or failing, is still a gun. After that, the
difference is only in what kind of gun it is.
… if you were to discuss a law that
allows or restricts the creation and distribution of firearms, would
you attempt to do so without acknowledging the existence of
3D-printed weapons and the ability to transfer blueprints for them
online?
Here’s the problem, though. Like the
digitization of music, the digitization of objects, guns or
otherwise, is a one-way street. Every step forward is ineffaceable.
Once you can make an MP3 and share it online, that’s it, there’s
no going back — the industry is changed, just like that.
(Related) It's a law, but I'm not sure
what it means... Is it designed to keep guns out of certain areas or
only concealed guns?
Bill
allowing concealed weapons in schools approved by House committee
… Michigan now prohibits
people licensed for concealed weapons from carrying them
in schools, day care centers, sports arenas, bars, places of worship,
hospitals, dorms and casinos. They can, however,
openly carry their guns in schools and all other places
except federal buildings, courthouses and casinos.
The bill would let CPL holders apply
for an exemption so they could carry concealed guns
in those gun-free zones, though they no longer could
openly carry there under the legislation.
(Related) Try to be factual..
December 16, 2012
GunPolicy.org
provides evidence-based, public health-oriented information on armed
violence around the globe
"The international bulletin of
firearm injury prevention since 1997, Gun Policy News provides daily
global and regional bulletins of small arms policy, armed violence
prevention and gun control news published in mass media.
GunPolicy.org
is hosted by the Sydney
School of Public Health, the University of
Sydney. The School provides internationally recognised leadership in
public health by advancing and disseminating knowledge — in this
case, supporting global efforts to prevent gun injury. With its
partners and contributors, GunPolicy.org promotes the public health
model of firearm injury prevention, as adopted by the United Nations
Programme of Action on illicit small arms." Users may Search
Gun Policy News by Keyword or Phrase, News by Country, News by Region
- See also The Small Arms Survey 2012: Moving Targets "looks at what is changing, and not changing, in relation to armed violence and small arms proliferation around the world."
Stuff I find interesting...
… Georgetown has
joined
edX. (edX member institutions now includes
Harvard, MIT, UC Berkeley, the University of Texas system, Wellesley
College, and Georgetown.)
… Straighterline
has launched
“Professor Direct” — something that Fast Company’s Anya
Kamenetz describes as an “eBay
for professors” — which will allow individual
professors to offer their own online courses, set their own tuition,
and offer (ACE) credit.
… More international test score
data — the TIMSS (the Trends in International Math
and Science Study) and PIRLS (Progress in
International Reading Literacy Study) — were released this week,
providing lots of fuel for the ol’ “American education is broken”
narratives. The U.S. scores are “unacceptable if our schools are
to live up to the American promise of giving all
children a world-class education,” [Who promised that? Bob]
said
Arne Duncan. But University of Oregon education professor Yong
Zhao has the best response to this handwringing and notes wryly
“The fact the U.S. as a nation is still standing despite of its
abysmal standing on international academic tests for over half a
century begs two questions: Is education as important to a nation’s
national security and economy as important as believed? If it is,
are the numbers telling the truth about the quality of education in
the U.S. and other nations?”
No comments:
Post a Comment