Reducing
lawyers to a math formula – I love it!
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10506-021-09300-9
Contract
as automaton: representing a simple financial agreement in
computational form
We
show that the fundamental legal structure of a well-written financial
contract follows a state-transition logic that can be formalized
mathematically as a finite-state machine (specifically, a
deterministic finite automaton or DFA). The automaton defines the
states that a financial relationship can be in, such as “default,”
“delinquency,” “performing,” etc., and it defines an
“alphabet” of events that can trigger state transitions, such as
“payment arrives,” “due date passes,” etc. The core of a
contract describes the rules by which different sequences of events
trigger particular sequences of state transitions in the relationship
between the counterparties. By conceptualizing and representing the
legal structure of a contract in this way, we expose it to a range of
powerful tools and results from the theory of computation. These
allow, for example, automated reasoning to determine whether a
contract is internally coherent and whether it is complete relative
to a particular event alphabet. We illustrate the process by
representing a simple loan agreement as an automaton.
(Related)
https://www.amazon.com/Digital-Lawyering-Technology-Practice-Century-ebook/dp/B09HVDZCNJ/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=Digital+Lawyering%3A+Technology+and+Legal+Practice+in+the+21st+Century&qid=1634475734&s=books&sr=1-1
Digital
Lawyering: Technology and Legal Practice in the 21st Century
Digital
technologies have already begun a radical transformation of the legal
profession and the justice system. Digital Lawyering introduces
students to all key topics, from the role of blockchain to the use of
digital evidence in courtrooms, supported by contemporary case
studies and integrated, interactive activities. The book considers
specific forms of technology, such as Big Data, analytics and
artificial intelligence, but also broader issues including
regulation, privacy and ethics. It encourages students to explore
the impact of digital lawyering upon professional identity, and to
consider the emerging skills and competencies employers now require.
Using this textbook will allow students to identify, discuss and
reflect on emerging issues and trends within digital lawyering in a
critical and informed manner, drawing on both its theoretical basis
and accounts of its use in legal practice.
(Related)
https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429298219-7/using-artificial-intelligence-enhance-augment-delivery-legal-services-ann-thanaraj
Using
artificial intelligence to enhance and augment the delivery of legal
services
Artificial
intelligence (AI) will redefine the legal profession, changing and
evolving the role lawyers perform. New types of work will be
available, including symbiotic new specialisms using a perfect blend
of human expertise focusing on complex high-level advisory work
supported by technology and its affordances. This chapter will
explore how AI is already supporting the profession and what the
future holds for our further collaboration, questioning the requisite
set of skills, tools and assets needed to thrive in the changing
legal world. It will also include an ethical exploration of the
extent AI decision-making can impact our professional
responsibilities and legal ethics and question the need to realign
the fundamental tenets of professional ethics for law practice. AI
will most certainly be at the forefront of how the legal evolves over
the next 50 years.
As
a retired auditor, this interests me. Perhaps we should train an AI
to conduct audits like this?
https://www.axios.com/algorithmic-audits-ai-bias-a895bba4-05bb-4d6e-bd01-59c18627393d.html
AUDITS
ATTEMPT TO CLEAN UP AI BIAS
AI
algorithms employed in everything from hiring to lending to criminal
justice have a persistent and often invisible problem with bias.
The
big picture: One solution could be audits that aim to determine
whether an algorithm is working as intended, whether it's
disproportionately affecting different groups of people and, if there
are problems, how they can be fixed.
… Financial
audits exist in part to open up the black box of a company's internal
operations to outside investors, and ensure that a company remains in
compliance with financial laws and regulations.
In
the case of algorithmic audits, however, the actual workings of AI
can be a black box to the company itself because unless
explainability is built into the foundation of an algorithmic model,
it can be easy to get lost.
(Related)
I can easily foresee an AI vigilante. Think ‘Terminator.”
(Think AIs that think of themselves as victims.)
https://academic.oup.com/ijlit/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/ijlit/eaab008/6389717
AI
ethical bias: a case for AI vigilantism (AIlantism) in shaping the
regulation of AI
The
debate on the ethical challenges of artificial intelligence (AI) is
nothing new. Researchers and commentators have highlighted the
deficiencies of AI technology regarding visible minorities, women,
youth, seniors and indigenous people. Currently, there are several
ethical guidelines and recommendations for AI. These guidelines
provide ethical principles and humancentred values to guide the
creation of responsible AI. Since
these guidelines are non-binding, it has no significant effect.
It is time to harness initiatives to regulate AI globally and
incorporate human rights and ethical standards in AI creation. The
government need to intervene, and discriminated groups should lend
their voice to shape AI regulation to suit their circumstances. This
study highlights the discriminatory and technological risks suffered
by minority/marginalised groups owing to AI’s ethical dilemma. As
a result, it recommends the
guarded deployment of AI vigilantism to regulate the use of AI
technologies and prevent harm arising from AI systems’ operations.
The appointed AI vigilantes will comprise mainly persons/groups with
an increased risk of their rights being disproportionately impacted
by AI. It is a well-intentioned group that will work with the
government to avoid abuse of powers.
(Related)
True bias or simple math?
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3940705
When
a Small Change Makes a Big Difference: Algorithmic Fairness Among
Similar Individuals
If
a machine learning algorithm treats two people very differently
because of a slight difference in their attributes, the result
intuitively seems unfair. Indeed, an aversion to this
sort of treatment has already begun to affect regulatory practices in
employment and lending. But an explanation, or even a definition, of
the problem has not yet emerged. This Article explores how these
situations—when a Small Change Makes a Big Difference
(SCMBDs)—interact with various theories of algorithmic fairness
related to accuracy, bias, strategic behavior, proportionality, and
explainability. When SCMBDs are associated with an algorithm’s
inaccuracy, such as overfitted models, they should be removed (and
routinely are.) But outside those easy cases, when
SCMBDs have, or seem to have, predictive validity, the ethics are
more ambiguous. Various strands of fairness (like
accuracy, equity, and proportionality) will pull in different
directions. Thus, while SCMBDs should be detected and probed, what
to do about them will require humans to make difficult choices
between social goals.
I
told my AI to file may taxes, is it my fault if it didn’t?
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9564076
Delegation
of moral tasks to automated agents The impact of risk and context on
trusting a machine to perform a task
The
rapid development of automation has led to machines increasingly
taking over tasks previously reserved for human operators, especially
those involving high-risk settings and moral decision making. To
best benefit from the advantages of automation, these systems must be
integrated into work environments, and into society as a whole.
Successful integration requires understanding how users gain
acceptance of technology by learning to trust in its reliability. It
is thus essential to examine factors that influence the integration,
acceptance, and use of automated technologies. As such,
this study investigated the conditions under which human operators
were willing to relinquish control, and delegate tasks to automated
agents by examining risk and context factors experimentally. In a
decision task, participants (N=43, 27 female) were placed in
different situations in which they could choose to delegate a task to
an automated agent or manual execution. The results of our
experiment indicated that both, context and risk, significantly
influenced people’s decisions. While it was unsurprising that the
reliability of an automated agent seemed to strongly influence trust
in automation, the different types of decision support systems did
not appear to impact participant compliance. Our findings suggest
that contextual factors should be considered when designing automated
systems that navigate moral norms and individual preferences.
A
useful idea?
https://msocialsciences.com/index.php/mjssh/article/view/1086
A
Study on the Laws Governing Facial Recognition Technology and Data
Privacy in Malaysia
The
advancement of technology in the past decade has led humans to
achieve many great things. Among that is facial recognition
technology that uses a combination of two techniques which is face
detection and recognition that is capable of converting facial images
of a person into readable data and connecting it with other data sets
which enable it to identify, track or compare it. This
study delves into the usage of facial recognition technology in
Malaysia where its regulation is almost non-existent. As
its usage increases, the invasive features of this technology to
collect and connect its data posed a threat to the data privacy of
Malaysian citizens. Due to this issue, other countries' laws and
policies regarding this technology are examined and compared with
Malaysia. This enables the loopholes of the current law and policies
to be identified and restructured, which create a clear path on the
proper regulations and changes that need to be made. Thus, this
study aims to analyse the limitation of law governing data privacy
and its concept in Malaysia along with changes that need to be made.
This study’s finding shows the shortcoming of Malaysia’s law in
governing data privacy especially when it involves complex technology
that has great data collection capability like facial recognition.
Somewhat
a rant, but if it took them 20 years to notice the “surveillance
state,” perhaps these aren’t the best observers.
https://www.salon.com/2021/10/16/after-20-years-its-time-to-repeal-the-patriot-act-and-begin-to-dismantle-the-surveillance-state/
After
20 years, it's time to repeal the Patriot Act and begin to dismantle
the surveillance state
Another perspective on the inevitable?
https://www.eimj.org/uplode/images/photo/The_Copyright_Protection_of%C2%A0AI_Created_works_by_the_European_Union_Copyright_Legislation..pdf
The
Copyright Protection of AI-Created works by the European Union
Copyright Legislation
In the European Union, copyright law has
increasingly focused on broadening the scope of works that have a
right to intellectual property protection. Currently, the law
applies to a variety of work categories, including literary works,
music, film, and sound recordings, among others. Although
breakthroughs in artificial intelligence (AI) continue to contribute
to the emergence of machine-generated creative works, the European
Copyright Legislation framework does not consider non-human
discoveries. There are currently breakthroughs that allow autonomous
programs to create products of significant monetary worth ranging
from software to literary works, photographs, and music.
To that end, this research study critically
examines the current EU copyright legislation in order to understand
its position on copyright protections for AI-generated works.
Furthermore, the study explains why AI-generated works should be
protected and what legal tools should be improved to provide
copyright protection.
According to the findings, these creations should
be protected as incentive to developers and as a guarantee of
technological advancement for the entire society.