If not now, when?
https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/is-ai-a-legal-person/373407
Is AI a Legal Person?: Redefining the Limits of Legal Personhood
The traditional legal principles of personhood, which have historically been reserved for humans and, in certain situations, companies, are being challenged by the rapid breakthroughs in artificial intelligence (AI). It is necessary to grant legal personhood to AI systems as their decision-making abilities increase. Legal personhood, according to proponents, would guarantee accountability and provide legal redress for harm brought about by AI's acts (Tretyakova, 2021; Hárs, 2022). Critics argue that AI is devoid of fundamental characteristics that are important to conventional notions of personality, such as consciousness and moral agency (Forrest, 2021; Schneider, 2019). This proposal examines frameworks, including Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics and Hohfeldian jural relations, to suggest approaches where AI can assume legal responsibilities without full personhood status. The study aims to develop regulatory strategies that balance innovation with ethical and societal safeguards.
E-book.
https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/entities/publication/2c576502-ce94-4a0a-9c73-0e7f7f36da44
Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers: Navigating Novel Methods and Practices for the Future of Law
In an era marked by rapid technological advancements, the legal profession stands at the precipice of a transformative evolution. The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into legal research and practice heralds a new dawn, promising unprecedented efficiency, accuracy, and strategic insight. This book, "Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers: Navigating Novel Methods and Practices for the Future of Law," delves into the profound impact of AI on the legal landscape, offering a comprehensive guide to understanding and leveraging these cutting-edge technologies.
Making AI fit.
GDPR and Large Language Models: Technical and Legal Obstacles
Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing but present significant technical and legal challenges when confronted with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). This paper examines the complexities involved in reconciling the design and operation of LLMs with GDPR requirements. In particular, we analyze how key GDPR provisions—including the Right to Erasure, Right of Access, Right to Rectification, and restrictions on Automated Decision-Making—are challenged by the opaque and distributed nature of LLMs. We discuss issues such as the transformation of personal data into non-interpretable model parameters, difficulties in ensuring transparency and accountability, and the risks of bias and data over-collection. Moreover, the paper explores potential technical solutions such as machine unlearning, explainable AI (XAI), differential privacy, and federated learning, alongside strategies for embedding privacy-bydesign principles and automated compliance tools into LLM development. The analysis is further enriched by considering the implications of emerging regulations like the EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act. In addition, we propose a four-layer governance framework that addresses data governance, technical privacy enhancements, continuous compliance monitoring, and explainability and oversight, thereby offering a practical roadmap for GDPR alignment in LLM systems. Through this comprehensive examination, we aim to bridge the gap between the technical capabilities of LLMs and the stringent data protection standards mandated by GDPR, ultimately contributing to more responsible and ethical AI practices.
Law in the future?
https://journals.rcsi.science/1026-9452/article/view/285439
The Digital or Information Code: prospects for legislative regulation
The article deals with the topical issues of legal regulation of information relations in the conditions of rapid development of digital technologies and increasing conflict of interests between states and global IT-corporations. The author emphasizes the complexity of legal regulation, especially in the issues of data encryption and access to confidential information of users. Special attention is paid to conflicts between states and IT-corporations over control over digital technologies.
In particular, the need for improved information law is emphasized, including the enshrinement of digital rights such as the right to delete personal information, the right to a pseudonym, arbitration in online disputes, and the right to appeal decisions involving artificial intelligence. Important steps are also proposed to strengthen administrative and legal liability for digital offenses such as wrongful disclosure of confidential information, spamming and digital bullying.
The author focuses on the need to systematize information legislation and emphasizes that government measures should take into account the rights and freedoms of users, limiting government intervention where it is inappropriate. Legislation should be aimed at protecting civil rights, but at the same time leave room for the development of the IT sector and innovations.
The article presents a comprehensive view of the problem of legal regulation of the digital industry in the context of Administrative Law, proposing specific steps to create a balanced legislative framework that takes into account the interests of both the state and society in the context of ongoing digital transformation.
No comments:
Post a Comment