A non-technical attack on technology? Trying out techniques for the coming war with NATO?
https://www.ft.com/content/0c208ac1-f416-41b2-a373-ec7f90b84ca8
Finland seizes Russian shadow fleet oil tanker after cable-cutting incident
Finland suspects an oil tanker that is part of Russia’s so-called shadow fleet of damaging an underwater electricity cable and three communication cables, opening an investigation into the vessel for aggravated sabotage.
The Eagle S was seized and boarded by Finnish authorities on Thursday, a day after the Estlink 2 subsea electricity cable in the Gulf of Finland was disconnected.
The tanker, which is registered in the Cook Islands and is carrying oil from Russia to Egypt according to ship tracking data, was seen passing over the cable at the time of the incident.
Finnish police said on Thursday that they believe the vessel’s anchor, which they did not find on the ship, cut the cables.
… The Christmas Day incident appears to be the latest in a series of pipelines and cables being targeted in the Baltic Sea by foreign vessels, sparking fears of deliberate attacks on critical infrastructure between Nato countries.
Treat AI as non-technical? I wouldn’t.
https://www.zdnet.com/article/why-ethics-is-becoming-ais-biggest-challenge/
Why ethics is becoming AI's biggest challenge
Many organizations are either delaying or pulling the plug on generative AI due to concerns about its ethics and safety. This is prompting calls to move AI out of technology departments and involve more non-technical business stakeholders in AI design and management.
More than half (56%) of businesses are delaying major investments in generative AI until there is clarity on AI standards and regulations, according to a recent survey from the IBM Institute for Business Value. At least 72% say they are willing to forgo generative AI benefits due to ethical concerns.
Notice that they did not ask AI…
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/constitutional-constraints-on-regulating-artificial-intelligence/
Constitutional Constraints on Regulating Artificial Intelligence
On July 12, 2024, the Congressional Study Group on Foreign Relations and National Security convened virtually to discuss possible constitutional limits on and barriers to the regulation of artificial intelligence (AI). Concerns over the rapid development of AI technology has led policymakers at all levels to consider an array of possible regulatory approaches. While Congress debates a possible federal approach, several states had begun to step into the void with their own legislation. The leading example is California’s S.B. 1047, which would, among other measures, require that all AI developers of a particular scale “provide reasonable assurance” under oath that their models are unable to cause $500 million in damage to critical infrastructure within the state or lead to a mass-casualty event. But observers have questioned whether such requirements are consistent with the First Amendment and other possible constitutional constraints.
(Releted)
Proposed state law would regulate artificial intelligence in Texas
No comments:
Post a Comment