This could be useful…

https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3691620.3695353

CompAi: A Tool for GDPR Completeness Checking of Privacy Policies using Artificial Intelligence

We introduce CompAı - a tool for checking the completeness of privacy policies against the general data protection regulation (GDPR). CompAı facilitates the analysis of privacy policies to check their compliance to GDPR requirements. Since privacy policies serve as an agreement between a software system and its prospective users, the policy must fully capture such requirements to ensure that collected personal data of individuals (or users) remains protected as specified by the GDPR. For a given privacy policy, CompAı semantically analyzes its textual content against a comprehensive conceptual model which captures all information types that might appear in any policy. Based on this analysis, alongside some input from the end user, CompAı can determine the potential incompleteness violations in the input policy with an accuracy of ≈96%. CompAı generates a detailed report that can be easily reviewed and validated by experts. The source code of CompAı is publicly available on https://figshare.com/articles/online_resource/CompAI/23676069, and a demo of the tool is available on https://youtu.be/zwa_tM3fXHU.

AI as owner. Who gets paid?

https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byuplr/vol38/iss1/10/

Plagiarism or Progress?: An Inquiry into Generative AI and Copyright

The emergence of accessible artificial intelligence (AI) in 2022, including notable models such as Chat GPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing Chat, has sparked significant discourse regarding their societal impact. This paper delves into the contrasting perspectives regarding the role of Large Language Models (LLMs) in society, particularly in the realm of copyright law. While pessimists express concerns about the potential stifling of human ingenuity and innovation, optimists advocate for embracing AI's creative potential, advocating for legal reforms to address copyright issues. Focusing on the legal domain, this paper argues for amending US copyright law to accommodate AI-generated content, proposing that the primary creator of such content should hold copyright, contingent upon user involvement. By examining the inherent challenges within the current legal framework and proposing reforms to uphold innovation and creativity, this article aims to contribute to a comprehensive understanding of AI's influence on copyright law.

Perspective.

https://digitalcommons.onu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1367&context=onu_law_review

AI in Robes: Courts, Judges, and Artificial Intelligence

The legal system, courts, and judges in particular, are often criticized for being slow to address new technologies.1 That has not been the case with artificial intelligence (“AI”), especially since the public release of generative AI programs such as ChatGPT.2 In the last couple of years, the court systems and individual courts have proactively taken steps to anticipate and prepare to deal with issues created by AI.3 These actions include both steps to allow courts to take advantage of the benefits offered by AI, and to be prepared to identify and mitigate the risks created by AI.4 This rare technological activism by the courts reflects an understanding of the profound impacts that AI is likely to have on the legal system and society.

This Article reviews the actions that courts have taken to address AI.5 Part I examines the role of the courts in policing the inappropriate use of AI by attorneys.6 Part II describes the courts’ utilization of AI in their operations, both in administrative applications and in researching and drafting judicial opinions and orders.7 In both supervising attorneys’ and their own use of AI, courts have acted surprisingly proactively, spurred on by the rapid speed and powerful capabilities of emerging AI tools.8