Wednesday, June 03, 2020


Result of CCPA?
Google faces $5 billion lawsuit in U.S. for tracking ‘private’ internet use
Reuters: “Google was sued on Tuesday in a proposed class action accusing the internet search company of illegally invading the privacy of millions of users by pervasively tracking their internet use through browsers set in “private” mode. The lawsuit seeks at least $5 billion, accusing the Alphabet Inc unit of surreptitiously collecting information about what people view online and where they browse, despite their using what Google calls Incognito mode. According to the complaint filed in the federal court in San Jose, California, Google gathers data through Google Analytics, Google Ad Manager and other applications and website plug-ins, including smartphone apps, regardless of whether users click on Google-supported ads. This helps Google learn about users’ friends, hobbies, favorite foods, shopping habits, and even the “most intimate and potentially embarrassing things” they search for online, the complaint said. Google “cannot continue to engage in the covert and unauthorized data collection from virtually every American with a computer or phone,” the complaint said…”
    • Brown et al v Google LLC et al, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 20-03664.




Not exactly a coordinated strategy.
YouTube Censorship Case Turns on Internet Law Trump Scorns
In a censorship case filed against YouTube by LGBTQ content creators, the U.S. Justice Department is defending the law that protects internet companies from lawsuits – the same statute President Donald Trump has threatened to revoke.
Trump targeted the 1996 law in an executive order last week as he escalated a fight with Twitter after it tagged two of his tweets as potentially misleading. But three weeks earlier, the Justice Department weighed into the YouTube case and urged a federal judge not to declare the law unconstitutional after the content creators said it allows the Google video-sharing site to violate their free-speech rights.


(Related) I’m surprised it took so long!
Lawsuit Says Trump’s Social Media Crackdown Violates Free Speech
The nonprofit Center for Democracy and Technology says in the suit that Mr. Trump’s attempt to unwind a federal law that grants social media companies discretion over the content they allow on their platforms was retaliatory and would have a chilling effect on the companies.
The lawsuit — filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia — is indicative of the pushback that the president is likely to face as he escalates his fight with social media companies, which he has accused of bias against conservative voices. It asks the court to invalidate the executive order.




Why DEA? Drugs? No. Authorization to investigate non-drug crimes.
DEA Has Permission To Investigate People Protesting George Floyd’s Death
The Drug Enforcement Administration has been granted sweeping new authority to “conduct covert surveillance” and collect intelligence on people participating in protests over the police killing of George Floyd, according to a two-page memorandum obtained by BuzzFeed News. Floyd’s death “has spawned widespread protests across the nation, which, in some instances, have included violence and looting,” the DEA memo says. “Police agencies in certain areas of the country have struggled to maintain and/or restore order.” The memo requests the extraordinary powers on a temporary basis, and on Sunday afternoon a senior Justice Department official signed off. Attorney General William Barr issued a statement Saturday following a night of widespread and at times violent protests in which he blamed, without providing evidence, “anarchistic and far left extremists, using Antifa-like tactics,” for the unrest. He said the FBI, DEA, US Marshals, and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives would be “deployed to support local efforts to enforce federal law.”…




Act quick, because we’re slow!
California AG Submits CCPA Regulations for Approval – Requests Expedited Review Ahead of July 1 Enforcement Deadline
The final text is unchanged from the most recent draft published on March 11, which we previously summarized. The final text also is accompanied by a revised Statement of Reasons that explains the basis for the regulations and outlines textual changes from the initial draft regulations published on October 11, 2019.




There’s something strange about how this company is managed.
Zoom won’t encrypt free calls because it wants to comply with law enforcement
If you’re a free Zoom user, and waiting for the company to roll out end-to-end encryption for better protection of your calls, you’re out of luck. Free calls won’t be encrypted, and law enforcement will be able to access your information in case of ‘misuse’ of the platform.
Zoom CEO Eric Yuan today said that the video conferencing app’s upcoming end-to-end encryption feature will be available to only paid users. After announcing the company’s financial results for Q1 2020, Yuan said the firm wants to keep this feature away from free users to work with law enforcement in case of the app’s misuse:




Interesting points.
Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Collides with the World of Intellectual Property in the New Decade
The past ten years brought with them a seemingly never-ending array of data intensive and increasingly “intelligent” technologies. While data security and privacy remain paramount, an increasingly data-intensive technological, economic, and social landscape will mean that the ownership and control of data will become increasingly important and likely oft-contested. It is here that the worlds of data privacy, security, and protection collide with the world of intellectual property. This is a trend we can expect to grow in the decade ahead, as data intensive technologies like artificial intelligence (“AI”), blockchain, and the Internet of Things (“IoT”) and the Cloud continue to break new ground, altering the legal and security landscape in the process.




For those, “Oops! I didn’t mean that!” moments.
You Can Now Delete Your Old Facebook Posts in Bulk




Food for thought.
In late March, Attorney General William Barr announced that “decision time” was looming for America’s leading tech firms. By early summer, Barr expects the Department of Justice to reach preliminary conclusions about possible antitrust violations by Silicon Valley’s largest companies. The DOJ’s investigation is just one of several probes scrutinizing potential abuses by Facebook, Google, Amazon, Apple, and Microsoft. While concerns over consumer protections, anti-competitive practices, and industry concentration have fueled these antitrust investigations, their results will almost certainly have national-security ramifications.
Secretary of Defense Mark Esper has argued that artificial intelligence is likely to shape the future of warfare, and the national-security community has largely backed that conclusion. The most recent National Defense Strategy, released in 2018, highlights AI’s importance, noting that the Pentagon will seek to harness “rapid application[s] of commercial breakthroughs…to gain competitive military advantages.” With defense officials arguing that U.S. military superiority may hinge on artificial intelligence capabilities, antitrust action aimed at America’s largest tech companies—and leading AI innovators—could affect the United States’ technological edge.




Because: Bored!
The 6 Best Sites to Download Karaoke Music Without Words
If you want to download these videos from YouTube so that you can play them locally without an internet connection, check out our guide on free ways to download any video.
Rather than downloading existing karaoke tracks, it’s also quite easy to make your own using music that you already own. For this, you need to download free music software Audacity.



No comments: