Friday, June 12, 2020


How far does “Know thy customer” extend?
Wendy Davis reports:
Maine’s new broadband privacy law is “an extreme outlier,” industry lobbying groups are telling a federal judge.
The law, slated for enforcement in August, requires internet service providers to obtain customers’ opt-in consent before using web-browsing data for ad targeting.
A coalition of broadband lobbying groups sued in February to block the law, arguing that it violates carriers’ First Amendment rights by restricting their ability to use information about customers.
Read more on MediaPost.




This may apply more widely than Covid…
Coronavirus recovery – data protection advice for organisations




As one of the few people in the entire world (my students tell me) who does not own a smartphone, I would pass invisibly through the geofence dragnet.
Google’s Geofence Warrants Face a Major Legal Challenge
Unlike a traditional search order that identifies a particular suspect, geofence warrants require Google to trawl its massive library of location data, commonly known as the “Sensorvault,” to identify people who were in the area when a crime was committed. They are relatively new, and increasingly widespread: Between 2017 and 2018, Google saw a 1,500% surge in the number of requests it received, and from 2018 to 2019, the rate increased over 500%.
But in the process of pinpointing anyone who may have been near the scene of a crime, geofence warrants have also pointed police toward people like Jorge Molina, a warehouse worker in Arizona who was arrested as a murder suspect after police obtained data showing his phone at the crime scene. Molina spent nearly a week in jail before being found innocent. Which is why, as the prevalence of geofence warrants has increased, so has the alarm of defense lawyers, privacy advocates, and civil rights groups, who point to a lack of federal oversight that has left Google to serve as gatekeeper of a legal process they believe, at its core, violates the Constitution.
Geofence warrants like the one in this case are incapable of satisfying the probable cause and particularity requirements, making them unconstitutional general warrants,” the lawyers argued in a motion to suppress evidence. The brief goes on to describe them as “the digital equivalent of searching bags of every person walking along Broadway because of a theft in Times Square.”




Does this indicate a broader change? Let’s hope so!
MIT, guided by open access principles, ends Elsevier negotiations
MIT News: “Standing by its commitment to provide equitable and open access to scholarship, MIT has ended negotiations with Elsevier for a new journals contract. Elsevier was not able to present a proposal that aligned with the principles of the MIT Framework for Publisher Contracts. Developed by the MIT Libraries in collaboration with the Ad Hoc Task Force on Open Access to MIT’s Research and the Committee on the Library System in October 2019, the MIT Framework is grounded in the conviction that openly sharing research and educational materials is key to the Institute’s mission of advancing knowledge and bringing that knowledge to bear on the world’s greatest challenges. It affirms the overarching principle that control of scholarship and its dissemination should reside with scholars and their institutions, and aims to ensure that scholarly research outputs are openly and equitably available to the broadest possible audience, while also providing valued services to the MIT community…More than 100 institutions, ranging from multi-institution consortia to large research universities to liberal arts colleges, decided to endorse the MIT Framework in recognition of its potential to advance open scholarship and the public good…”




Perspective. Can we compare the war on Covid to the ramp up of industries after Pearl Harbor?
Rumors, death, and a tech overhaul: Inside Amazon’s race to hire 175,000 workers during a pandemic
The rollout of virtual hiring and onboarding was at least two years away. Covid-19 changed everything.
In the first quarter of 2020, the e-commerce giant’s net sales increased by 26% over the same period a year earlier. It was panic-buying on a grand scale. Amazon.com search rankings from mid-March awarded top billing to toilet paper, hand sanitizer, and Clorox wipes, but shelter-in-place orders and social distancing meant online shopping was now the way to buy almost anything. Over the next two months, the company determined, it would need to add 175,000 people—a bit less than the entire population of Providence, Rhode Island—to its workforce. But in order to do it, Amazon would need to convert almost completely to virtual hiring and training.



No comments: