Thursday, August 15, 2019


A ‘loss of Internet’ horror story. Could it happen here?
India Shut Down Kashmir’s Internet Access. Now, ‘We Cannot Do Anything.’
Pharmacists can’t restock medicines; workers aren’t being paid. But the government still loves to block the internet for “peace and tranquillity.”
Shopkeepers said that vital supplies like insulin and baby food, which they typically ordered online, were running out. Cash was scarce, as metal shutters covered the doors and windows of banks and A.T.M.s, which relied on the internet for every transaction. Doctors said they could not communicate with their patients.
While Prime Minister Narendra Modi has promoted the rapid adoption of the internet, particularly on smartphones, to modernize India and bring it out of poverty, the country is also the world leader in shutting down the internet.
The country has increasingly deployed communications and internet stoppages to suppress potential protests, prevent rumors from spreading on WhatsApp, conduct elections and even stop students from cheating on exams. Last year, India blocked the internet 134 times, compared with 12 shutdowns in Pakistan, the No. 2 country, according to Access Now, a global digital rights group, which said its data understates the number of occurrences.
Kashmir has become invisible even to itself,” said Gurshabad Grover, a senior policy officer at the Center for Internet and Society in Bangalore, quoting a recent line in The Indian Express. The center published a report last year on the social and economic toll of internet shutdowns across India.
The United Nations has repeatedly condemned government-ordered internet shutdowns as a violation of human rights.
But that has not deterred India from routinely using the tool. Under India’s laws, authorities at even the local level can easily shut down internet access in the name of ensuring “peace and tranquillity.”


(Related) Which raises the question…
How Sustainable are Russia’s Plans to Fully Control Internet?
The Russian government has been planning to up its control over the Web for quite some time, and now it has all but done it. Passed by the Duma this spring, the so-called “Independent Internet Law” takes effect on November 1. Though its pretext appears noble at a first glance — protection against cyberattacks and foreign pressure — its real purpose is very much clear to both involved parties: the government and the Russian people.




The hacks should be interesting.
Alexa, time for class: How one university put an Echo Dot in every dorm room
Saint Louis University -- the oldest university west of the Mississippi, in fact -- is the first to put smart speakers in dorm rooms.
Each dorm room comes equipped with an SLU-emblazoned, second-gen Echo Dot and instructions on how to use it, what students can ask and what to do if there are technical issues.
The network of 2,300 Echo Dots is powered by Amazon's Alexa for Business platform. A private SLU skill built through Amazon Web Services is enabled on each Echo Dot. That skill can answer more than 135 questions about campus events, building hours, even nearby food options.
Students can stream music, podcasts and live radio through iHeartRadio and call any phone number, including contacts in SLU's directory of student services.
there's no personally identifiable information recorded, stored or handed over to the SLU team. Each Echo Dot is labeled with a sticker containing the dorm room number and a MAC address, but there's no data gathered on which room is asking which questions.




Interesting idea, but this will only work if you opt out of almost everything.
How Data Privacy Laws Can Fight Fake News
Data privacy laws like the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) are not intended to address harmful speech. Their main goal is giving users greater control over their personal data, allowing people to check what data has been stored, opt out of data sharing, or erase their data entirely. Personal data generally includes information directly or indirectly linking accounts to real-life individuals, like demographic characteristics, political beliefs, or biometric data.
By limiting access to the information that enables personalized ad targeting and polarization loops, data privacy laws can render disinformation a weapon without a target. Absent the detailed data on users’ political beliefs, age, location, and gender that currently guide ads and suggested content, disinformation has a higher chance of being lost in the noise.




Worth a half-hour of your time?
Governance in the Age of AI
Artificial intelligence is a powerful technology with capabilities that are open to use by state and non-state actors. In this conversation Azeem Azhar, De Kai, and Joanna Bryson discuss how governance should adapt as our institutions are challenged by unintended consequences of the technology and its creators.
Joanna, De Kai, and Azeem also discuss:
  • Why rule-based systems fall short of protecting us against the unintended consequences of technology.
  • The value of cross-cultural dialogue in establishing common values to guide the governance of AI globally.
  • The role of the leading technology companies in regulating the industry.
Listen and subscribe to this podcast via Apple Podcasts | Google Podcasts




Some interesting stuff.
High-Profile Jitters Over AI
Also, Kroger to build automated warehouses and why weather forecasting will never be perfect.
Editor’s note: Elsewhere is a column that highlights ideas from other media platforms we believe are worth your attention.




How clever of them. Perhaps they should attend the Privacy Foundation’s November 1 seminar on “Artificial Intelligence and Ethics
ABA Votes to Urge Legal Profession to Address Emerging Legal and Ethical Issues of AI
Robert Ambrogi – LawSites: “The American Bar Association’s House of Delegates, its policy-making body, voted this week to approve a resolution urging courts and lawyers to address the emerging ethical and legal issues related to the usage of artificial intelligence in the practice of law. Among the AI-related issues the profession should address, the ABA said, are bias, explainability, and transparency of automated decisions made by AI; ethical and beneficial usage of AI; and controls and oversight of AI and the vendors that provide AI…”



No comments: