Ransomware
can be defeated!
Warwick
Ashford reports:
St John Ambulance has reported that it was hit by a ransomware attack this week, but was able to isolate the attack and resolve it within half an hour.
Fortunately, the ransomware did not affect operational systems, but blocked access to the charity’s booking system for training courses and encrypted customer data.
Read
more on ComputerWeekly.
[From
the article:
The
charity has been praised for its swift, effective and transparent
response to the ransomware attack, which is currently the
most common cyber criminal activity affecting individuals and
businesses in the UK, according to the police.
… “The
best way to prevent ransomware attacks is for companies to ensure
they are not vulnerable by following
best practices on cyber security basics to ensure good
cyber hygiene,” said Jones.
“Having
good, functional data backups, treating your data as an asset, having
appropriate policies around your data, and having incident response
available to you are all simple ways of mitigating the harm from
ransomware, which is the most prevalent form of attack we see.”
This
could get interesting. (But, I can’t find it on LiveMint)
Prathma
Sharma reports:
The Supreme Court on Friday issued notice to the Centre and the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) in a petition challenging the validity of the 2019 Aadhaar Ordinance.
The petition challenged the Aadhaar and Other Laws (Amendment) Ordinance, 2019 and the Aadhaar (Pricing of Aadhaar Authentication Services) Regulations, 2019, alleging that these violate fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution.
The notice was issued by a division bench of Justices SA Bobde and BR Gavai.
The petition said “Aadhaar database lacks integrity as it has no value other than, at most the underlying documents on the basis of which the Aadhaar numbers are issued… none of the data uploaded at the time of enrollment is verified by anyone/ much less a government official.”
Read
more on LiveMint
Still not there. Would we understand the
explanation if we got it?
I, BLACK
BOX: EXPLAINABLE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE LIMITS OF HUMAN
DELIBERATIVE PROCESSES
Much
has been made about the importance of understanding the inner
workings of machines when it comes to the ethics of using artificial
intelligence (AI) on the battlefield. Delegates at the Group of
Government Expert meetings on lethal autonomous weapons continue
to raise the issue. Concernsexpressed
by
legal
and
scientific
scholars
abound. One commentator sums
it up:
“for human decision makers to be able to retain agency over the
morally relevant decisions made with AI they would need a clear
insight into the AI black box, to understand the data, its provenance
and the logic of its algorithms.”
The
underlying premise of such arguments is that if humans are making
decisions on the ground, then other humans farther up the food chain
in battlefield decision-making — commanders, political leadership,
analysts, and so forth — will be able to find out why they made
those decisions and respond accordingly. If algorithms are making
these decisions, the thinking goes, we’ll have no such insight, and
we’ll lose meaningful human control. But psychology research shows
that we humans are not nearly as explainable as we give ourselves
credit for, so we might be overstating the meaningfulness of the
human control we thought we had in the first place.
Enter
“explainable
artificial intelligence,”
sometimes
called XAI.
With algorithms that can explain their decision-making processes —
in a way that humans often can’t — technology could increase,
rather than decrease, the likelihood that those decision-makers who
are not on the ground will get an accurate answer as to why a given
decision was made.
Perspective.
No big deal if you are too young to remember Sputnik.
Amazon
Seeks Permission to Launch 3,236 Internet Satellites
Cute,
with a smattering of truth.
Hicks
column: Tales of horror and suspense from Charleston’s internet
outage
The survivors will tell these stories for
generations.
Earlier this week, Charleston endured a horrifying
glimpse of how fragile modern civilization really is ... for nearly
12 whole hours.
It started around noon Tuesday, when children
across the Lowcountry reported acute — and epidemic — boredom.
Soon, millennials were denied food, coffee and other basic
necessities when some businesses demanded payment in cash.
Netflix binges ended midstream, people couldn’t
order cat food from Amazon Prime, and overweight white men were
denied their God-given right to share doctored photos of Alexandria
Ocasio-Cortez.
There was no joy in Summerville; the mighty
internet had gone out.
… This is what the Dark Ages must’ve been
like, but somehow Charlestonians endured.
Tools to help you listen, bookmark, or speed read…
No comments:
Post a Comment