Friday, November 16, 2018

This is changing. The GDPR is only the first of many laws and regulations that will make breaches much more expensive. (Even “material” in the accounting sense.)
Erik Sherman reports:
If you live in the United States, there’s almost a 50 percent chance your personal data was lost in the giant Equifax data breach a year ago of 143 million records. Google had its own data breach in October this year that exposed data on as many as 500,000 accounts. Or the most recent Facebook breach of data from 29 million users. Or, over the last five years alone, major breaches at Anthem, eBay, JPMorgan Chase, Home Depot, Yahoo, Target, Adobe … but you get the point. If it’s day that ends in “day,” there must have been another major data breach that keeps criminal hackers gainfully employed by selling your information.
Bad guys keep getting smarter, experts say. Why not corporations? The short answer is, because it’s not worth their trouble.
Read more on Motherboard.


(Related) For my students.
List of free GDPR resources and templates
  1. Webinars: Supporting you in your GDPR compliance project
  2. Green paper: EU General Data Protection Regulation – A compliance guide
  3. Video: What does the GDPR mean for your business in the UK
  4. Infographic: What the GDPR means in 1 minute
  5. GDPR templates: Documenting your compliance




There is a way, but no one has used it yet (to my knowledge). It requires voting machines to produce a paper voting summary with a random number. All the summaries are then published, in number order for voters to confirm. Any problem matching the voter’s copy with the “official” version is automatically documented. (There are a few more procedural steps, but nothing impossible to implement.)
Was Your Voting Machine Hacked? Without More User-Friendly Devices, We May Not Know
… In their preliminary review of Election Day, officials from the Department of Homeland Security reported vote-casting problems in Alabama, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Maine, North Carolina, Texas, and Virginia. But they said they did not detect “an outright hack of voting systems.” Good news, of course. Yet, our antiquated election infrastructure remains, on the whole, so unusable that even if voting machines were more secure, voters would still be acutely vulnerable to misinformation. This failure of “usability” means voters aren’t in a position to properly detect irregularities on the frontlines, a role that security specialists depend on from their end-users.
… When discussing the future of voting in the United States, it is absolutely right to call for verifiable, accurate, secure, and transparent voting systems. But in a world where “hacked,” “tampered,” and “rigged” is on the lips of many voters, we must provide the most important election stakeholders — the voters — with an easy, convenient, and intuitive voting experience.




Consider possible downsides. Could the watch tell your insurer that you are a bad risk? Could you “void” your insurance coverage?
UnitedHealthcare will pay for your Apple Watch if you meet your fitness goals
Back in 2016 UnitedHealthcare and Qualcomm teamed up on a fitness program called Motion. It's an incentive program that can earn you up to $1,460 a year by meeting fitness goals. While it started with a custom wearable, it soon added support for devices from Fitbit and then Samsung and Garmin.




Facebook: It’s where the data is!
Facebook reports a massive spike in government demands for data, including secret orders
Facebook has published the details of 13 historical national security letters it’s received for user data.
… These demands for data are effectively subpoenas, issued by the FBI without any judicial oversight, compelling companies to turn over limited amounts of data on an individual who is named in a national security investigation. They’re controversial — not least because they come with a gag order that prevents companies from informing the subject of the letter, let alone disclosing its very existence.
… (You can read all of the disclosed national security letters here.)
… Facebook’s latest transparency report shows that the number of government demands for data rocketed by 26 percent year-over-year, from 82,341 to 103,815 requests.
The U.S. government’s demands for customer data went up by 30 percent, to 42,466 total requests, Facebook said, affecting 70,528 accounts. The company said that more than half included a non-disclosure clause that prevented the company from informing the user.


(Related) Targeting better ads is very similar to finding high-level terrorists. I suspect Facebook hires people from certain government agencies to apply their skills.
Facebook Filed A Patent To Predict Your Household's Demographics Based On Family Photos
Facebook has submitted a patent application for technology that would predict who your family and other household members are, based on images and captions posted to Facebook, as well as your device information, like shared IP addresses. The application, titled “Predicting household demographics based on image data,” was originally filed May 10, 2017, and made public today. Facebook did not immediately respond to a request for comment, but the patent suggests that the company is interested in exploring the technology, which is intended to help Facebook target advertising more effectively.
… The system Facebook proposes in its patent application would use facial recognition and learning models trained to understand text to help Facebook better understand whom you live with and interact with most. The technology described in the patent looks for clues in your profile pictures on Facebook and Instagram, as well as photos of you that you or your friends post.
It would note the people identified in a photo, and how frequently the people are included in your pictures. Then, it would assess information from comments on the photos, captions, or tags (#family, #mom, #kids) — anything that indicates whether someone is a husband, daughter, cousin, etc. — to predict what your family/household actually looks like.




Lawyers do make mistakes, but this might work as well if it was deliberate. Will Ecuador change it’s mind about asylum?
Filing indicates indictment was prepared for Julian Assange
A court document filed by mistake has revealed that the Justice Department is preparing to criminally charge WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.
In a slip unearthed by a former U.S. intelligence official and posted on Twitter, Assange’s name appears twice in an August court filing by a federal prosecutor in Virginia — an argument to keep sealed an unrelated case involving an accused child sex criminal.
The prosecutor wrote that the charges and arrest warrant “would need to remain sealed until Assange is arrested in connection with the charges in the criminal complaint and can therefore no longer evade or avoid arrest and extradition in this matter.”
At another point in the document, the prosecutor wrote that “due to the sophistication of the defendant and the publicity surrounding the case, no other procedure is likely to keep confidential the fact that Assange has been charged.”
.. Assange came to prominence after WikiLeaks published secret military and diplomatic documents leaked in 2010 by Pvt. Chelsea Manning.
Manning served 7 years in prison, but WikiLeaks was not prosecuted. Justice Department lawyers concluded at the time that they could not charge Assange and WikiLeaks even as American newspapers, protected by the First Amendment, were publishing the leaked material.
But in recent years, U.S. officials have sought to distinguish WikiLeaks from journalists, as when then-CIA Director Mike Pompeo referred to it as a “hostile non-state intelligence organization.”




Who knew that space could get crowded?
FCC tells SpaceX it can deploy up to 11,943 broadband satellites
The Federal Communications Commission voted to let SpaceX launch 4,425 low-Earth orbit satellites in March of this year. SpaceX separately sought approval for 7,518 satellites operating even closer to the ground, saying that these will boost capacity and reduce latency in heavily populated areas. That amounts to 11,943 satellites in total for SpaceX's Starlink broadband service.




Where my academic world is headed.
Germany pledges €3bn investment in artificial intelligence
Germany will spend €3 billion to boost its artificial intelligence capabilities over the next six years, as part of a belated effort by Berlin to catch up with leading AI nations such as China and the United States.
… The strategy paper also promises the creation of 100 university chairs with a focus on AI, along with additional research centres to complement facilities such as the German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI), which was founded in 1988. In total, Germany is aiming for a network of 12 centres for research, development and application of AI technologies offering “internationally attractive working conditions and pay”.


No comments: