I don't think it's related to the
legalization of marijuana – it just sounds that way in the national
news. Lots to consider here, including how to do it properly?
Katie Rogers reports:
Students in Cañon City, Colo., could face criminal charges after an
investigation found they were trading hundreds of nude pictures of
themselves and other teenagers on their phones using special apps to
keep the images secret, the schools superintendent said Friday.
The investigation began on Monday, and officials at Cañon City High
School determined that students had been circulating between 300 and
400 illicit photos involving at least 100 students, said George
Welsh, the superintendent of the Cañon City School District. Some
of the students in the photos were eighth graders, and several of the
students who possessed the pictures were members of the school’s
football team, Mr. Welsh said.
Read more on NY
Times.
[From
the article:
Amy Adele Hasinoff, an assistant professor at the
University of Colorado Denver and the author of a new book, “Sexting
Panic,” contends that schools need to find new ways to talk to
students about the issue. Rather than just demanding that students
abstain from sending risqué images, she said, educators should aim
for open conversations that involve guidance
in “safer sexting” with trusted partners.
Something smells here. Are these kids like the
initial story suggested? If so, why no arrests? Did the CIA
Director's hack open more doors for the hackers? A story to follow.
Nathan Ingraham reports:
Earlier this year, a hacking group broke into the personal email account of CIA director John Brenner and published a host of sensitive attachments that it got its hands on (yes, Brenner should not have been using his AOL email address for CIA business). Now, Wired reports the group has hit a much more sensitive and presumably secure target: a law enforcement portal that contains arrest records as well as tools for sharing info around terrorist events and active shooters. There’s even a real-time chat system built in for the FBI to communicate with other law enforcement groups around the US.
The group has since published a portion the data it collected to Pastebin and Cryptobin
Read more on Engadget.
The group also hacked the personal email accounts of FBI Deputy
Director Mark Giuliano and his wife, as Hacker
News reported.
What would you bet that none of the presidential
candidates will suggest eliminating the TSA.
Shocker:
When it comes to security the TSA still sucks eggs
Billions of dollars later, the TSA is still
incompetent and its screening process is full of fail. The House
Oversight and Government Reform Committee wanted
answers about TSA security gaps. The DHS Office of Inspector
General released a damning report and testified the TSA has not made
any real improvements since it failed the last round of covert
testing.
Perhaps this is why the FCC wants to create
specific privacy regulations?
Gerald J. Ferguson and of Alan L. Friel of Baker &
Hostetler write:
The Third Circuit interlocutory decision in Federal Trade Commission v. Wyndham Worldwide Corporation was widely reported as a big win for the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”). But on closer examination, it was a split decision in which Wyndham Worldwide Corporation (“Wyndham”) can claim an important victory. While affirming the FTC’s authority to regulate cyber-security practices under the “unfair practices” prong of the Federal Trade Commission Act (the “FTC Act”), the Third Circuit also rejected the FTC’s contention that FTC settlements and consent orders in cyber-security cases with unrelated parties have created standards against which Wyndham’s practices can be tested for “unfairness.” This Third Circuit decision identifies defenses companies should develop when facing FTC allegations that the company’s cyber-security practices are “unfair.”[1]
Read more on Baker
& Hostetler.
A difficult network to map…
A survey by Jinyan Zang, Krysta Dummit, James
Graves, Paul Lisker, and Latanya Sweeney will be of interest to some
readers. Here’s the Abstract:
What types of user data are mobile apps sending to third parties? We chose 110 of the most popular free mobile apps as of June-July 2014 from the Google Play Store and Apple App Store, across 9 categories likely to handle potentially sensitive data about users including job information, medical data, and location. For each app, we used a man-in-the-middle proxy to record HTTP and HTTPS traffic that occurred while using the app and looked for transmissions that include personally identifiable information (PII), behavior data such as search terms, and location data, including geo-coordinates. An app that collects these data types may not need to notify the user in current permissions systems.
Results summary: We found that the average Android app sends potentially sensitive data to 3.1 third-party domains, and the average iOS app connects to 2.6 third-party domains. Android apps are more likely than iOS apps to share with a third party personally identifying information such as name (73% of Android apps vs. 16% of iOS apps) and email address (73% vs. 16%). For location data, including geo-coordinates, more iOS apps (47%) than Android apps (33%) share that data with a third party. In terms of potentially sensitive behavioral data, we found that 3 out of the 30 Medical and Health & Fitness category apps in the sample share medically-related search terms and user inputs with a third party. Finally, the third-party domains that receive sensitive data from the most apps are Google.com (36% of apps), Googleapis.com (18%), Apple.com (17%), and Facebook.com (14%). 93% of Android apps tested connected to a mysterious domain, safemovedm.com, likely due to a background process of the Android phone. Our results show that many mobile apps share potentially sensitive user data with third parties, and that they do not need visible permission requests to access the data. Future mobile operating systems and app stores should consider designs that more prominently describe to users potentially sensitive user data sharing by apps.
You access the full report on JOTS.
It also shows the limitations.
Egypt Crash
Shows Key Role Surveillance Can Play: Analysts
… The
Times and the Daily Telegraph reported Friday that the NSA and GCHQ
had intercepted telephone calls recorded before
the plane catastrophe last Saturday.
They
concluded from the intercepts that it was possible that an attack by
the Egyptian branch of the Islamic State group, known as Sinai
Province, had brought down the plane after it took off from Sharm
el-Sheikh.
On
Friday, a source close to the investigation said the black boxes
recovered from the Saint Petersburg-bound jet pointed to a bomb
attack, apparently confirming suspicions expressed by US President
Barack Obama and British Prime Minister David Cameron.
I'm betting there is a big “yet” that goes
with this story.
The FCC
says it can’t force Google and Facebook to stop tracking their
users
… The announcement
is a blow to privacy advocates who had petitioned the agency for
stronger Internet privacy rules. But it's a win for many Silicon
Valley companies whose business models rely on monetizing Internet
users’ personal data.
A heads-up for my Android toting students.
Beware: New
Android malware is ‘nearly impossible’ to remove.
New strains of Android malware are masquerading as
popular apps like "Candy Crush" and Snapchat, but once
installed dig themselves so deeply into smartphones they are "nearly
impossible" to remove,and could force people to replace their
devices, according to cybersecurity firm Lookout.
The company says it observed over 20,000 samples
of this type of adware in the digital wild. Some of the malicious
apps functioned like their real counterparts, but they all also
quietly gain "root access" to a device and install
themselves as system applications. That means they have practically
unlimited access to files on the device -- a big security and privacy
risk. That's why it is so difficult to totally remove the apps.
But, luckily, there is a pretty easy way to avoid
them: Only install apps from Google's official Play Store.
In theory, I could print a Stanley Steamer with
all the modern safety features. Will we see custom “print-a-car”
shops?
World's
first 3D-printed car could cost you $53,000
My students don't need no stinking App!
5
Delightfully Evil Sites That Generate Excuses for You
Perhaps not reliable enough for lawyers, but for
my students?
LawLib is a
free law library for your Apple products
by Sabrina
I. Pacifici on Nov 6, 2015
“LawLibe™
is a law library for your iPhone®, iPad®, or iPod Touch®.
LawLibe™
is a free app
that comes preloaded with the U.S. Constitution. Then you can
download additional legal content directly into the app, including
the U.S. Code, Code of Federal Regulations, State Statutes, the
Manual of Patent Examining Procedure, and more! Features:
• Fully offline –
just download what you need and go!
• Download additional content directly into the app!
• Lightning-fast speed
• Full-text search and in-text highlighting
• Page through content just like a book
• User preferences – adjust the font and font-size for easier reading
• GoTo Button – know the exact section you want? It’s one touch away
• Includes Advisory Committee Notes where available
• Updated frequently to ensure you have the most current edition
• Download additional content directly into the app!
• Lightning-fast speed
• Full-text search and in-text highlighting
• Page through content just like a book
• User preferences – adjust the font and font-size for easier reading
• GoTo Button – know the exact section you want? It’s one touch away
• Includes Advisory Committee Notes where available
• Updated frequently to ensure you have the most current edition
For my researching students.
Find the
Date of a Published Post with These Insanely Simple Tips
Because it's inevitable!
How to
Install Windows
10 for Free on any Windows, Linux, or OS X PC
Another week, another wacky collection...
Hack
Education Weekly News
… On the heels of giving the state of Ohio
some $32+ million in grants to expand its charter school system, the
Department of Education is now putting some restrictions on that
money, sending
a letter “to state officials in which it said it did not
realize the extent of concerns regarding Ohio's charter schools.”
… “Cheating in Online Classes Is Now Big
Business,”
The Atlantic reports.
… Also
via the NYT: “A small survey of parents in Philadelphia found
that three-quarters of their children had been given tablets,
smartphones or iPods of their own by age 4 and had used the devices
without supervision.”
No comments:
Post a Comment