My Data Management class was discussing the
fragility of data collections. Thanks for the great fail example
Starbucks! Also points out that people don't carry cash (or baristas
can't make change)
Starbucks
back in business: Internal report blames deleted database table,
indicates outage was global
Good news, Starbucks fans: The coffee giant’s
stores are open again. Bad news: The coffee isn’t free anymore.
The Seattle-based coffee company says it has
resolved a
point-of-sale computer outage that struck stores in the U.S. and
Canada on Friday afternoon and evening. The outage made big news as
baristas around the country, unable to ring up transactions, started
giving away coffee at no charge, before the company announced that it
would be closing stores early.
… The company’s point-of-sale system runs
on MICROS Simphony. An apparent internal Starbucks incident
report — posted on Reddit by a person identified as a “corporate
partner” — said “the main POS table was deleted,” preventing
any stores from logging in and ringing transactions.
The incident report, which has since been deleted
from Reddit, described the impacted region as “Global,” including
North America and EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa).
Starbucks has publicly characterized the incident
as a North American problem. Because of the time difference,
problems at closed stores overseas would not have been as obvious,
but as further evidence, a Redditor who works at a 24-hour Starbucks
in the UK says
systems went down there, and describes the problem as global.
We’ve asked Starbucks to clarify the geographic scope of the
problem.
“We can, therefore we must!”
http://hothardware.com/News/ftc-sinks-fangs-into-firm-guilty-of-incessantly-tracking-mobile-shoppers
FTC Sinks
Fangs Into Firm Accused Of Incessantly Tracking Mobile Shoppers
The FTC
has just laid the smackdown on yet another company that's been
found guilty of exploiting mobile
users without their knowledge. The FTC found that the company,
called Nomi Technologies, even went against its own privacy
policy mere months after it promised not to, in late 2012.
Nomi's business model involves working with retail
outlets to install sensors in their stores. As a customer walks in,
these sensors fetch a phone's
MAC address, which is broadcast broadcast via Wi-Fi, and begin to
track it. You can see where this is going. With information
in-hand, Nomi is able to tell these retailers about a couple of
different things: how long the customer stayed in the store, and how
often they visit. I would not be surprised of the retails gained
information on other stores the customer went to.
… The biggest flaw with Nomi's operation is
that its opt-out methods were useless. If someone doesn't even
realize they're being tracked, how are they going to know about an
opt-out mechanism? While this tracking system was in place, Nomi had
data on over 9 million phones.
Going forward, Nomi has said that it will begin
abiding by its own privacy policy, but I am not entirely sure how
it's going to go about its business when it
profits most on unsuspecting users.
Sure to be heavily debated. I was thinking that
it should be simple to keep only 20 minutes or so (deleting anything
older) unless someone overrides the delete. Most “Encounters”
take less than 20 minutes. The override could come from the officer,
his on-scene supervisor, the communications center, or any other
specified authority.
What Good
Is a Video You Can't See?
Soon, thousand of police officers across the
country will don body-worn cameras when they go out among the public.
Those cameras will generate millions of hours of footage—intimate
views of commuters receiving speeding tickets, teens getting arrested
for marijuana possession, and assault victims at some of the worst
moments of their lives.
As the
Washington Post and the
Associated Press have reported, lawmakers in at least 15 states
have proposed exempting body-cam footage from local open records
laws. But the flurry of lawmaking speaks to a larger crisis: Once
those millions of hours of footage have been captured, no one is sure
what to do with them.
… If a body-cam program, scaled across an
entire department, were to release its footage willy-nilly, it would
be a privacy catastrophe for untold people. Police-worn cameras
don't just capture footage from city streets or other public places.
Officers enter people's homes, often when those people are at their
most vulnerable.
So while body-cam
footage is “very clearly a public interest record,” says Emily
Shaw, the national policy manager at the Sunlight Foundation, it
is also “just full of
private information.”
… But some experts
say that, if departments can’t deal with the high cost of Freedom
of Information Act (FOIA) requests, then officers shouldn’t get
body cameras.
… If there’s any consensus among experts
considering body camera policy, it’s about this: Most groups,
including
the ACLU, agree that individuals recorded by body cameras should
have access to that footage.
Yet implementing even that provision is tricky,
says Shaw.
“If there are several people in the video and
some of them don’t want it to be public but one of them really
does, what happens in that circumstance?,” she told me. “Even if
you redact the person who doesn’t want to be seen there, everybody
knows this person is an associate of this person who is visible.”
Do you know what works before you try it? How
long should your 'experiment' last? Who gets to call, “Stop?”
Charlie Savage reports:
The secrecy surrounding the National Security Agency’s post-9/11 warrantless surveillance and bulk data collection program hampered its effectiveness, and many members of the intelligence community later struggled to identify any specific terrorist attacks it thwarted, a newly declassified document shows.
Read more on The
New York Times.
The old phrase is, “Caesar's wife must be above
suspicion.” Will future generations have a phrase than begins,
“Clinton's wife...”
State
Department records show official concern about Clinton ties to 'Saudi
entities'
State Department officials raised
concerns about former President Bill Clinton's
ties to Saudi Arabia in 2011 amid a flurry of ethics reviews that
weighed whether his philanthropic and commercial activities posed any
conflicts of interest with his wife's duties as secretary of state.
According to documents obtained by the nonprofit
Judicial Watch, the department's legal team repeatedly discussed
Clinton Foundation activities in countries around the world.
The heavily
redacted emails refer to an "urgent"
foundation matter in Tanzania that required legal guidance as Bill
Clinton prepared to touch down in the African nation. Un-redacted
portions of the emails suggest the problem involved a "specific
arrangement with Tanzania post" in June 2010.
Because I'll want to find this list later.
13
Antivirus Software Options for Your Business
For my students' toolkit.
Your Mobile
Phone can Detect Earthquakes
Was it just you or did the ground really shake?
Your iPhone, iPad and most newer mobile phones can work as basic
seismometers, the same instrument that is used to measure the
magnitude of earthquakes and volcanoes. You
don’t need to install any apps, just the built-in web
browser would suffice.
OK, try this. Launch Google Chrome or the Safari
browser on your mobile phone (or tablet) and then open this
page. You should see a continuously moving waveform but if you
slightly shake or tilt your mobile device, simulating seismic
activity, the graph will capture these movements in real-time much
like a seismograph.
No comments:
Post a Comment