Parts
of two long (and interesting) articles. Looks like ignorance of the
law is a defense for “educators.”
From
EPIC:
EPIC has obtained
documents
from the Department of Education detailing
parent and student complaints
about the misuse of educational records. The Department released
the documents
in response to an EPIC Freedom
of Information Act request. The documents
reveal
that schools
and districts have disclosed students’ personal records without
consent, possibly in violation of the Family Educational Rights
and Privacy Act. The documents also reveal that the Department
failed to investigate many FERPA complaints. EPIC is expecting to
receive more documents about the agency’s enforcement of the
federal student privacy law. For more information, see EPIC:
Student Privacy and EPIC:
Open Government.
Having
read through all the files EPIC shared, I think it would be more
accurate to say that the Family Policy Compliance Office (FPCO)
decided that no
investigation was warranted in the vast majority of the complaints
due to some common misunderstandings about what rights FERPA
provides.
(Related)
Also lloks like “educators” can't (or like students, don't
bother to) read. TL;DR?
Over
on PogoWasRight.org, I’ve recapped the U.S. Education Department’s
responses
to privacy complaints filed by parent and students under the
Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). In going through
the data provided to EPIC in response to their Freedom of Information
Act request, I noted that in a few cases, the Family Policy
Compliance Office (FPCO) either responded to an inquiry about a data
breach or reached out to university or school to offer technical
assistance to help them comply with FERPA if they had had a data
breach.
Here
is part of their boilerplate response in 2011 to an entity that had
experienced a breach involving missing folders with education
records:
The preamble to the December 8, 2009, FERPA regulations explains the
necessity for educational agencies and institutions to ensure that
adequate controls are in place so that the education records of all
students are handled in accordance with FERPA’s privacy
protections.
Laws
follow technology like shovels follow a snow storm.
Consumer
Cloud Robotics and the Fair Information Practice Principles
by
Sabrina I.
Pacifici on Jul 20, 2014
Proia,
Andrew A. and Simshaw, Drew and Hauser, Kris, Consumer Cloud Robotics
and the Fair Information Practice Principles: Recognizing the
Challenges and Opportunities Ahead (2014). Minnesota Journal of Law,
Science & Technology, Forthcoming. Available for download at
SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2466723
“Rapid
technological innovation has made commercially accessible consumer
robotics a reality. At the same time, individuals and organizations
are turning to “the cloud” for more convenient and cost effective
data storage and management. It seemed only inevitable that these
two technologies would merge to create cloud robotics, “a new
approach to robotics that takes advantage of the Internet as a
resource for massively parallel computation and sharing of vast data
resources.” By making robots lighter, cheaper, and more efficient,
cloud robotics could be the catalyst for a mainstream consumer
robotics marketplace. However, this new industry would join a host
of modern consumer technologies that seem to have rapidly outpaced
the legal and regulatory regimes implemented to protect consumers.
Recently, consumer advocates and the tech industry have focused their
attention on information privacy and security, and how to establish
sufficient safeguards for the collection, retention, and
dissemination of personal information while still allowing
technologies to flourish. Underlying a majority of these proposals
are a set of practices that address how personal information should
be collected, used, retained, managed, and deleted, known as the Fair
Information Practice Principles (“FIPPs”). This
Article examines recent frameworks which articulate how to apply the
FIPPs in a consumer setting, and dissects how these frameworks may
affect the emergence of cloud-enabled domestic robots.
By considering practical observations of how cloud robotics may
emerge in a consumer marketplace regulated by the FIPPs, this
research will help both the information privacy and robotics fields
in beginning to address privacy and security challenges from a law
and policy perspective, while also fostering collaboration between
roboticists and privacy professionals alike.”
Marcus
Zillman's lists are always large and complete.
New
on LLRX – Information Quality Resources
by
Sabrina I.
Pacifici on Jul 20, 2014
Via
LLRX.com
- Information
Quality Resources - Marcus
P. Zillman’s guide focuses on the
increasingly important topic of identifying reliable and actionable
Information resources on the internet, a task specifically critical
for researchers in all sectors. With the proliferation of non
attributable, un-vetted, un-sourced information churning 24/7 through
a spectrum of social media sites, getting it right takes time and
skill, but is well worth the effort.
No comments:
Post a Comment