If you were one of the Class Action lawyers suing Target, would this
cause you to burst into giggles?
Target
was warned of credit card data breach but failed to take adequate
steps
Could Target have
averted the credit card data breach that afffected over 70 million
customers? Possibly, if new reports are to be believed. Two months
prior to the Target hack that affected around 70 million credit and
debit card holders, a computer analyst of the retail giant had warned
the company about possible weaknesses of its payment system that can
be exploited by cyber criminals.
The warning from Target
computer security insider came following a series of reports received
by the company from research firms and government advisories warning
of possible new threats to payment terminals. The warning was
initially ignored by Target, according to sources of The Wall Street
Journal.
… "It is
everyone's worst-case scenario. As an intelligence analyst, there is
only so much you can do," the former Target employee told
WSJ. [Amen, brother! Bob]
… Target
has not issued a comment nor a denial that it ignored the warnings
and recommendations of its cyber security analysts. However, the
company informed the body of Congress investigating the matter that
its payment systems passed an
audit conducted in September. As of reporting, there
are at least 53 lawsuits filed against Target in connection with the
security breach.
Familiar name, but a small breach.
Kickstarter
Hacked, Users Suggested to Reset Their Password
On Wednesday night, law enforcement officials
contacted Kickstarter and alerted us that hackers had
sought and gained unauthorized access to some of our customers’
data. Upon learning this, we immediately closed the
security breach [Which suggests they knew how to secure this data
before the breach, but hadn't bothered to do so. Bob] and
began strengthening security measures throughout the Kickstarter
system.
The folks at
Kickstarter mentioned credit card details of the customers were not
compromised, but some information was accessed, including information
included usernames, email addresses, mailing addresses, phone
numbers, and encrypted passwords.
Shows just how big Flappy Bird was. (Still no word on why the author
took it down, but “Marketing” still looks like the most likely
explanaion. Can you say, “Coca Cola Classic?”)
Flappy
envy: Google, Apple block games with 'flappy' titles
Flappy Pig. Flappy
Super Hero. Flappy Plane. Call it Flappy Fever, but numerous games
with “Flappy” in the title are cropping up in app stores and it
looks like Google and Apple aren't having any of it.
… A writer for
TechCrunch
theorized that Apple may have had enough of the Flappy-esque games
decimating its popularity charts, saying: "The 'Flappy Bird'
craze reached mainstream media, which means everyday users who may
not following [sic] every turning point in this ongoing saga are just
hitting up the App Store and searching for a download."
(Related) An
infographic summary...
The
Rise And Fall Of Flappy Bird
Another case of
overreach? The student created the page, therefore he is responsible
for the comments others posted? Is this really the “Best Practice”
response to a nasty Twitter page or the “Best Practice” to combat
bulling?
Amber South reports:
Chambersburg
Area Senior High School officials have discovered the identity of the
student responsible for a Twitter page that became popular for
cyber-bullying.
The
student is being disciplined in accordance with district policy,
according to a district statement. No legal action is being taken,
added district spokesperson Tammy Stouffer.
The
administrations of Chambersburg Area School District and CASHS, and
the technology department, worked together to identify the student,
according to a statement. The student’s name will not be revealed,
due to the student privacy policy.
The
discovery comes less than two weeks after Principal Buddy Chapel told
students that he would find out who was behind CASHS Confessions, a
Twitter page on which students could anonymously post comments about
each other, most of which were negative.
Read more on Public
Opinion.
Why is this
blog-worthy? Because they’re handling it in-house and didn’t
refer this to law enforcement. Now we might argue that if this was
all done out of school, the district shouldn’t have any authority
at all, but most courts have granted districts the authority to deal
with situations that create emotionally unsafe or hostile
environments in school as a consequence of out-of-school behavior.
So under the circumstances, I’m pretty satisfied with the way this
district has handled this situation.
[From
the article:
I promise my students and parents that I will continue to work to
create an understanding of being responsible digital citizens, and
the potential longer-term consequences of cyber-bullying."
[Lessons on the 1st
Amendment are somehow unavailable. Bob]
… administrators would strictly enforce a cell phone ban, to
prevent students from accessing the site while at school. His
biggest concern, he said, was that a student bullied on the site
would take his or her own life.
"No student is
going to die on my watch because of this craziness," Chapel said
at one of the assemblies.
… He said any student found to be an administrator on the site
would get 10 days of out-of-school suspension and would undergo
administrative review with a recommendation to the school board for
expulsion.
Around the time that
Chapel announced the assemblies were to take place, the CASHS
Confessions page was taken down and replaced with a new page of the
same name, but with a different Twitter handle. The page description
basically stated that the page was a response to the administration's
crackdown, and comments posted were directed at Chapel and other
administrators.
"The action to
address the issue of cyber-bullying would have been the same,
regardless of the new sites being created," Stouffer said, when
asked what role the administrator-bashing comments had on the
administration's mission.
That page has since
been taken down.
… Not including the student who created the page, CASHS earlier
suspended three students for posting comments on CASHS Confessions.
Some have disputed that they were negatively involved, but Stouffer
has said the district can't share details on the suspensions because
of the student privacy policy.
Perhaps we could learn
how much of a “burden” this really is.
Robert Gehrke reports:
Utah
Attorney General Sean Reyes has discontinued his office’s use of
administrative subpoenas, a controversial law-enforcement tool that
lets investigators gather certain Internet or cellphone records
without getting a warrant, raising serious privacy concerns.
Instead,
investigators in the attorney general’s office are now required to
go to a judge and get an order allowing them to obtain the
information they are seeking.
Read more on Salt
Lake Tribune.
TANSTAAFL (There ain't
no such thing as a free lunch) I must admit, I can't figure out
which ads would result from “that idiot who teaches Math.”
Jeff Gould of Pewstone
Research writes:
When
it introduced a new privacy policy designed to improve its ability to
target users with ads based on data mining of their online
activities, Google said the policy didn’t apply to students using
Google Apps for Education. But recent court filings by Google’s
lawyers in a California class action lawsuit against Gmail data
mining tell a different story: Google now admits that it does data
mine student emails for ad-targeting purposes outside of school, even
when ad serving in school is turned off, and its controversial
consumer privacy policy does apply to Google Apps for Education.
Read more on
SafeGov.org.
Curves for my
statistics students on Valentine's Day?
When
You Fall in Love, This Is What Facebook Sees
Why do I get so many emails with this link? Stop it!
1 comment:
Great Article
Data Mining Projects IEEE for CSE
Final Year Project Domains for CSE
Post a Comment