How important is it to
get your facts (and the potential risks) correct? Is it better to
say, “I don't have that information in front of me, let me check
and get back to you?” In every “incident” I was involved with
as an Auditor, we started by documenting how data flowed through the
processes involved. Later we could look at each step and the
potential for something inappropriate to happen.
Four days after a
computer was stolen
from Inspira Medical Center Vineland, the hospital
still
can’t say whether there was any patient data on it?
That’s absurd. Just
ask the staff who were using it whether they entered patient data on
it. If they say “Yes, we used it for every radiology patient,”
then you have your answer. You may not know which patients or what
data yet, but at least you’d be able to say whether patient data
was on it or not. Significantly, perhaps, the employee who
reported the theft to the police told them that patient data was on
the computer.
If HHS investigates
this incident, I expect they’ll want to know how it is that after
four days, the hospital couldn’t say whether any patient data were
on a computer. Doesn’t that suggest a lack of inventory or
safeguards at the very least?
(Related)
First they said it
wasn’t, now they say it was but not to worry…. read Chris Welch’s
report on The
Verge.
[From the article:
Class action lawsuits
accusing
Target of not doing enough to protect consumer data are already
starting to pile up.
There is a problem in
believing that what you can see (or what you read in a newspaper) is
everything there is to see.
Reuters reports:
A
U.S. judge has concluded that the National Security Agency’s
sweeping collection of telephone data is lawful, rejecting a
challenge by the American Civil Liberties Union to the program.
U.S.
District Judge William Pauley in Manhattan on Friday said there was
no evidence that the government had used any of the so-called “bulk
telephony metadata” it had collected for any reason other than to
investigate and disrupt terrorist attacks.
You can read the ruling
here
(pdf).
There’s a lot there
to digest, none of it good news for privacy advocates from the parts
I’ve skimmed so far. Of note, Judge Pauley found that Congress had
ratified the Section 215 program as interpreted by the Executive
Branch when they reauthorized FISA after having the opportunity to
review a classified document that noted that it required the
collection of “substantially all” telephone calls. The judge
noted that not all members of the House had read the document, but
concluded that the Executive branch has fulfilled its obligation by
providing the memo.
So… we have members
of Congress to thank for failing to read what they could have read?
Would they have blocked the reauthorization of FISA had they been
paying more attention?
(Related)
NEW YORK – A federal
court issued an opinion and order in ACLU v. Clapper, the
ACLU’s challenge to the constitutionality of the NSA’s mass
call-tracking program, ruling that the government’s bulk collection
of phone records is lawful under Section 215 of the Patriot Act and
under the Fourth Amendment. The court denied the plaintiffs’
motion for a preliminary injunction and granted the government’s
motion to dismiss the case. Judge Pauley’s ruling conflicts with
last week’s ruling by a federal judge in Washington, D.C., that the
mass call-tracking program violates the Fourth Amendment. The ACLU
plans to appeal the ruling to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.
The plaintiffs filed
the lawsuit on June 11, 2013, less than a week after the mass
call-tracking program was revealed by The Guardian newspaper
based on documents obtained from NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden.
“We are extremely
disappointed with this decision, which misinterprets the relevant
statutes, understates the privacy implications of the government’s
surveillance and misapplies a narrow and outdated precedent to read
away core constitutional protections,” said Jameel Jaffer, ACLU
deputy legal director. “As another federal judge and the
president’s own review group concluded last week, the National
Security Agency’s bulk collection of telephony data constitutes a
serious invasion of Americans’ privacy. We intend to appeal and
look forward to making our case in the Second Circuit.”
The full ruling is
available at:
https://www.aclu.org/national-security/aclu-v-clapper-order-granting-governments-motion-dismiss-and-denying-aclu-motion
Why clutter the
intelligence space with useless data? The answer is, they don't! If
there is no evidence that they stopped a terrorist attack, ask what
value they do find in this data? How would you use the data?
Ryan Goodman has a post
on Just Security that is part of an ongoing dialogue* about the
report by the President’s Review Group. Ryan writes:
The
question I consider in this post is whether the Group’s assessment
will, and should, signal the effective demise of the program. I
examine the strongest claims that proponents of the program may still
raise; and I propose some analytic tools for considering the issue of
effectiveness, so that we might all (proponents, opponents, and
others alike) candidly assess this particular program’s potential
security benefits.
Read his commentary on
Just
Security.
*[Editor’s Note: Just
Security is holding a “mini forum” on the Report
by the President’s Review Group on Intelligence and Communications
Technologies. Others in the series include a post by Marty Lederman
analyzing the Report’s highlights,
post by Julian Sanchez examining the scope
of the NSA's section 702 program, a post by David Cole and Marty
Lederman analyzing how
metadata is used under section 215, and a post by Jennifer
Granick discussing the implications
for non-US persons (with a follow-up
post by Jennifer).]
For my students. (I'm
curious to see how the government thinks we should calculate...)
Get
Calculators and Worksheets to Evaluate Your Finances
by Sabrina
I. Pacifici on December 27, 2013
“Calculators are an
essential tool to help you evaluate your current financial situation,
and to get you where you want to be in the future. They can tell you
if you are in the “ballpark” for retirement, and help you analyze
fees associated with mutual funds and 529 Plans. Here
are just a few of the tools you’ll find on Investors.gov:
- 401(k) and IRA Required Minimum Distribution Calculator: After age 70½, you are generally required to start withdrawing money from your IRAs and 401(k)s. Find out the minimum amount you’ll need to withdraw, depending on your age and the value of your accounts.
- Compound Interest Calculator: Find out how much your money can grow, using the power of compound interest.
- Social Security Retirement Estimator: Get personalized benefit estimates to help you plan for retirement.
- Worksheet for Determining Your Net Worth: Use this worksheet to list your assets and debts.
- Worksheet for Tracking Your Income and Expenses: Keeping track of your income and expenses will help you stay on track with your financial goals.”
For my students who
read (There are some!) NOTE: I did skip a couple... Load these into
Calibre to organize and move to various devices.
Supercharge
Your eBook Reading With IFTTT
… As you probably
already know, IFTTT
is just the hack you’re looking for. This great automation service
can be used for anything from superpowering
Google Calendar to making
money, and yes, it can also be used to supercharge your eBook
reading. From finding eBook deals to automatically sending articles
to your Kindle, these are all the recipes you need.
This
recipe is based on the website FreeBooksHub
— a website dedicated to finding Kindle deals.
This
recipe takes any RSS feeds you’re interested in, and sends any new
items to your Kindle. Who said your Kindle is just for books?
…
define a Dropbox subfolder in your Public folder (for example,
public/kindle), which automatically transfers files to your Kindle.
Readability
has a feature that lets you connect your Kindle to your Readability
reading lists. You can check out this
help page to find out more about setting it up.
This
recipe monitors the Gold Box feed for the “Kindle” keyword, and
emails you only when a relevant deal appears. When using the recipe,
you can change the keyword to anything you want, so if it’s not
Kindle you’re interested in, the recipe is still very useful.
For my Android toting
students...
– draws the attention
of people who care about you at times of need, and makes it easier
for them to find you. Create response groups based on locations you
visit frequently, and add people who care about you to each group.
Whenever you don’t feel safe, start SafeSpot.
I can't help thinking
that I could make more money selling individual “How to” lessons
at $1 per, than I could teaching full time.
From
Cooking To Coding: Learn And Teach Lessons On Curious.com
If you have the time
and inclination to explore a new hobby, prepare a gourmet meal, learn
how to code, or pick up a few health and beauty tips, the online
learning site and mobile app, Curious.com,
offers hundreds of free or low cost video tutorials on a wide range
of topics.
Curious.com launched
last summer and is similar to Khan
Academy, Udemy,
Lynda.com, and
other
online course sites. Its online platform was recently expanded
into an iPhone
app, followed by its iPad
version which released this August.
… Each Curious
lesson is broken down into interactive sections with a few
multiple-choice review questions at the end of each lesson. Some
lessons may include PDF handouts, links to other resources, and a
feature for leaving comments and asking questions.
… Curious includes
a Curious
Lesson Builder platform for creating lessons, and uploading video
content to the site. Instructors get their own individual web page
(www.curious.com/yourbrand), and for paid lessons, teachers
receive 70% and Curious gets 30% of the paid tuition. Lessons can
easily be shared to social networks, and all uploaded content remains
non-exclusive and owned by the instructors.
Well, I find it
amusing...
… A
judge has ruled that Sherlock Holmes (and the
other characters and elements of Arthur Conan Doyle’s series) is no
longer covered by US copyright law and is now in the public domain.
… A
judge has ruled that the Douglas
County (Colorado)
school district “violated the state’s Fair Campaign Practices Act
when it hired Rick Hess to author a positive report
about school reforms that it later e-mailed to 85,000 subscribers in
the weeks before the November election.” All’s fair in
No comments:
Post a Comment