“Oh, you noticed that we broke into
your home? Don't worry, we were just testing your security.”
Associated Press reports:
The Speaker of the
Missouri House says an attempt to access a secure website listing
Missouri’s concealed gun permit holders was part of an
investigation into whether the state had appropriately shielded the
information.
In an interview
with The Associated Press, House Speaker Tim Jones, R-Eureka,
declined Monday to identify the person who tried to access the
information last Thursday. But Jones said it was an appropriate
action.
Read more on KY3.
So wait… when researchers attempt to
test the security of systems, they can get prosecuted criminally, but
state legislators can grant themselves permission to attempt to hack
a state database and that’s okay?
[From the article:
Those attempts were unauthorized
because information on concealed gun permit holders can only be
shared with law enforcement.
“What do they know and how long will
they keep it?”
The Electronic Frontier Foundation
(EFF) and the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California
(ACLU-SC) today jointly filed suit against two Los Angeles-area
law-enforcement agencies over their failure to produce records
related to the use of automatic license plate readers (ALPRs).
Mounted on squad cars and telephone
poles, these sophisticated camera systems read license plates and
record the time, date, and location a particular car was encountered.
EFF and the ACLU-SC filed requests with the Los Angeles Police
Department and the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department under
the California Public Records Act seeking documents
relating to policy and training on ALPRs, as well as a
week’s worth of ALPR data collected by the agencies in 2012. While
the sheriff and police departments produced some materials, they
failed to provide documents related to sharing information with other
agencies, and neither agency has produced the data collected during
the one-week period.
“Location-based information like
license plate data can be very revealing,” said EFF Staff Attorney
Jennifer Lynch. “By matching your car to a particular time, date
and location — and building a database of that information over
time — law enforcement can learn where you work and live, what
doctor you go to, which religious services you attend, and who your
friends are. The public needs access to data the police actually
have collected to be able to make informed decisions about how ALPR
systems can and can’t be used.”
… While the police can use this
technology to match license plates against databases to find stolen
or wanted cars, the systems
currently record and store information on every car, even where
there’s no reason to think a car is connected to any crime.
For the full complaint:
http://www.eff.org/document/aclu-sd-and-eff-v-lapd-and-lasd
Is this “playing nice?” Will China
pass a law requiriing Texas to turn over data?
Karen Brooks Harper reports:
A minor dustup
over the protection of private info hosted by ISPs flared up briefly
on the floor, on a bill by Rep. John Frullo that would allow Texas
judges to issue search warrants for companies based in other states –
like Yahoo in California – to hand over online records that could
help them investigate crimes relating to cases like child pornography
and human trafficking.
Frullo briefly
tried to fend off an amendment by Bedford GOP Rep. Jonathan Stickland
that requires law enforcement to get a warrant before they can get
emails from an ISP that are over 180 days old.
Read more on Dallas
Morning News. And see Grits
for Breakfast for comments on this development.
Finally someone will smack these
lawyers?
Judge
Asks IRS, Feds to Investigate Copyright-Trolling Attorneys
Using terms like “brazen conduct and
relentless fraud,” a federal judge on Monday sanctioned attorneys
running a BitTorrent copyright lawsuit factory, and recommended
federal prosecutors investigate for potential criminal charges.
Los Angeles federal judge Otis D.
Wright II said the Prenda Law attorneys’ “moral turpitude” is
“unbecoming
of an officer of the court.” (.pdf) The judge said the
attorneys “fraudulently signed” documents about who owned the
rights to sue thousands over the illegal downloading of pornographic
films.
The attorneys, including John Steele, a
Chicago barrister who has sued thousands for unlawfully downloading
porn, were also labeled a racketeering outfit.
The judge often used Star Trek
references as he blasted them.
“The federal agency eleven decks up
is familiar with their prime directive and will gladly refit them for
their next voyage. The Court will refer this matter to the United
States Attorney for the Central District of California. The will
also refer this matter to the Criminal Investigation Division of the
Internal Revenue Service and will notify all judges before whom these
attorneys have pending cases.”
Kurt Opsahl, an intellectual property
attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, said the judge’s
opinion underscores “the ease of which you can file copyright
lawsuits.”
… “Plaintiffs have outmaneuvered
the legal system. They’ve discovered the nexus of antiquated
copyright laws, paralyzing social stigma, and unaffordable defense
costs,” the judge wrote.
Adding insult to injury, the lawyers
were ordered to pay $40,000 in legal fees and the same in sanctions.
I thought this would be a 1 word
report: “Nuts!”
May 06, 2013
Military
and Security Developments Involving the Democratic People’s
Republic of Korea 2012
DOD - Military
and Security Developments Involving the Democratic People’s
Republic of Korea 2012. A Report to Congress Pursuant to the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012.
- "Section 1236 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, Public Law 112-81, provides that the Secretary of Defense shall submit a report "in both classified and unclassified form, on the current and future military power of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea" (DPRK). The report shall address an assessment of the security situation on the Korean Peninsula, the goals and factors shaping North Korean security strategy and military strategy, trends in North Korean security, an assessment of North Korea's regional security objectives, including an assessment of the North Korean military's capabilities, developments in North Korean military doctrine and training, an assessment of North Korea's proliferation activities, and other military security developments." [Greta E. Marlatt]
- News release - DOD Report: North Korea Still Critical U.S. Security Threat, by Cheryl Pellerin, American Forces Press Service
(Related) Nothing new here...
U.S.
says Chinese government behind cyberespionage
The Chinese government and military
have engaged in widespread cyberespionage targeting U.S. government
and business computer networks, the Pentagon said Monday.
China maintained a steady campaign of
computer intrusions in 2012 that were designed to acquire information
about the U.S. government's foreign policy and military plans,
according to the Pentagon's annual report to Congress on China's
military.
"China is using its computer
network exploitation capability to support intelligence collection
against the U.S. diplomatic, economic, and defense industrial base
sectors that support U.S. national defense programs," according
to the 83-page 2013 "Military and Security Developments
Involving the People's Republic of China" (PDF).
For the Crypto class...
May 06, 2013
Revolutionary
Secrets: Cryptology in the American Revolution
Revolutionary
Secrets: Cryptology in the American Revolution, Jennifer Wilcox,
Center for Cryptologic History, National Security Agency, 2012.
Another take on the “Freemium”
model?
Google
nears launch of paid YouTube subscriptions, report says
The information comes from a Financial
Times report over the weekend that suggests the company could be
rolling out paid subscriptions for over 50 different premium channel
partners. The subscriptions will reportedly set you back about
$2 per month, per channel.
We heard rumblings about paid
YouTube subscriptions back in January, with the video service
rumored to have been in discussions with several of its channel
partners about a new subscription-based program. It was also said
that those subscriptions would range between $1 and $5 per month,
which is in line with the FT report.
Google is currently
making plenty of money on YouTube videos, but the company
realizes it’s hitting a brick wall when it comes to gaining the
kind of content that people desire from other video services. The
company has already spent upwards of $200
million to market and cultivate premium content through its
channel partners, but so far it’s still not
lucrative enough for those partners. The subscription
would likely be another source of revenue both for Google and those
content creators.
(Related) Resolving the “First Sale”
question?
"According to CNET and various
other sources, CS6 will be the last version of Adobe's Creative Suite
that will be sold in the traditional manner. All future versions
will be available
by subscription only, through Adobe's so-called 'Creative Cloud'
service. This means that before too long, anyone who wants an
up-to-date version of Photoshop won't be able to buy it – they will
have to pay $50 per month (minimum subscription term: one year). Can
Adobe complete the switch to subscription-only, or will the backlash
be too great? Will this finally spur the creation of a real
competitor to Photoshop?"
For my phone and tablet packing
students.
Office
Suite Pro 7 (PDF &HD) Made by MobiSystems, OfficeSuite
Pro allows you to view, create, edit, print and share Word, Excel and
PowerPoint files on the go.
No comments:
Post a Comment