The
Privacy Foundation
(http://privacyfoundation.org/)
has the flier for their May 11th Seminar up on their
website. Where else can you gain so much wisdom for a mere $20? And
they toss in lunch for FREE!
(Related)
An exception to every rule...
Judges
Drive Truck Through Loophole in Supreme Court GPS Ruling
A federal judge in Iowa has ruled that
evidence gathered through the warrantless use of covert GPS vehicle
trackers can be used to prosecute a suspected drug trafficker,
despite a Supreme Court decision this year that found such tracking
unconstitutional without a warrant.
U.S. District Judge Mark Bennett in
Sioux City ruled
last week (.pdf) that the GPS tracking evidence gathered by
federal DEA agents last year against suspected drug trafficker Angel
Amaya, prior to the Supreme Court ruling, can be submitted in court
because the agents were acting in good faith at the time. The
agents, the judge said, were relying on what was then a binding 8th
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals precedent that authorized the use of
warrantless GPS trackers for surveillance in Iowa and six other
states.
(Related) Wonderful! Now my Ethical
Hackers will be able to “PROVE!” they were only going 15 mph when
they passed that cop.
"A bill already passed by the
Senate and set to be rubber stamped by the House would make it
mandatory
for all new cars in the United States to be fitted with black box
data recorders from 2015 onwards. Section 31406 of Senate Bill 1813
(known as MAP-21), calls for 'Mandatory Event Data Recorders' to be
installed in all new automobiles and legislates for civil penalties
to be imposed against individuals for failing to do so. 'Not later
than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary
shall revise part 563 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, to
require, beginning with model year 2015, that new passenger motor
vehicles sold in the United States be equipped with an event data
recorder that meets the requirements under that part,' states the
bill."
I'm
designing a line of foil lined baseball caps with pictures of my
favorite lawyers on top...
When
drones start flying over our neighborhoods, what will protect our
privacy?
April 20, 2012 by Dissent
Congressmen Ed Markey and Joe Barton,
co-chairs of the Congressional Bi-Partisan Privacy Caucus, have sent
a letter
to the FAA about drones and privacy concerns. They ask the right
questions about transparency and privacy protections – questions I
wish the FAA had been asked before the law had been passed.
A response is requested by May 10.
This could be very informative, but...
When this study started, did we even know what sexting was?
"A University of Texas-Dallas
developmental psychology professor has used a $3.4 million NIH grant
to purchase Blackberries for 175 Texas teens, capturing
every
text message, email, photo, and IM they've sent over the past 4
years. Half a million new messages pour into the
database every month. The researchers don't 'directly ask' the teens
about privacy issues because they don't want
to remind them they're being monitored. So many
legal and ethical issues here. I can't believe this is IRB-approved.
Teens sending nude photos alone could make that database legally
toxic. And then there's the ethical issue of monitoring those who
have not consented to be part of the study, but are friends with
those who have. When a friend texted one participant about selling
drugs, he responded, 'Hey, be careful, the BlackBerry people are
watching, but don't worry, they won't tell anyone.'"
This sounds like an American version of
the "Seven Up"
series.
Children have no rights! “Go ahead
and tell the parents when we're done.”
Cops
Take School Kids’ DNA in Murder Case
April 19, 2012 by Dissent
Alyssa Newcomb reports:
Samples of DNA
were collected without parental consent from students at a
Sacramento, Calif., middle school in connection with the murder of an
8th grade student who was found stabbed, strangled and
beaten to death near the dugout of a local park.
The Sacramento
Sheriff’s Department, which has been spearheading the investigation
into the murder of Jessica Funk-Haslam, 13, said
parental consent was not required in the DNA collection
and interview of minors, several of whom were taken out of class
during the day last week at Albert Einstein Middle School.
“These
are interviews, not interrogations,” Sheriff’s Deputy
Jason Ramos told ABCNews.com. “They are all
consensual. Once it’s done, there is a mechanism in place for
school administrators to notify parents.”
[...]
There is nothing
under California law that prohibits DNA collection of consenting
minors, said John Myers, a professor at the McGeorge School of Law in
Sacramento.
Say what?? How can minors meaningfully
consent? And what happens to the DNA samples after this
investigation? Will they be destroyed or will some profile be stored
in a state or federal database? And were the students told what
would happen to the samples before they were asked for their consent?
“Paging ACLU to Aisle 4….”
Read more on ABC.
It's now a question for the Supremes...
"In a somewhat startling
decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has ruled
that several employees at an executive recruitment firm did
not exceed their authorized access to their company's database
when they logged into the system and stole confidential data from it.
The appellate court's decision affirms a previous ruling made by the
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The
government must now decide if it wants to take the case all the way
to the U.S. Supreme Court. The judge wrote that the Computer Fraud
and Abuse Act, under which they were charged, applies primarily to
unauthorized access involving external hackers. The
definition of 'exceeds authorized access' under the CFAA applies
mainly to people who have no authorized access to the computer at
all, the judge wrote. The term would also apply to
insiders who might have legitimate access to a system but not to
specific information or files on the system Applying the language in
the CFAA any other way would turn it into a 'sweeping
Internet-policing mandate,' he wrote."
Another “suspect” legal
interpretation?
Motorcycle
Club’s Attorney Scoffs at FBI Assessment
… The FBI assessment, which Threat
Level reported
Wednesday, concluded that the Vagos
Motorcycle Club, which the bureau has declared an outlaw
motorcycle gang based in Southern California, has trademarked its
jacket patch — replete with the trademark registration symbol —
to block “law enforcement agencies from inserting undercover
officers” into the club.
“It’s the most ridiculous thing
I’ve ever heard in my life,” Joseph Yanny, the group’s
attorney, said in a telephone interview from Los Angeles. Yanny
quipped that the bureau, in coming to its conclusions, was likely
“interviewing clowns in Vegas.”
It used to be “Sport.” “Everything
that is not trademarked is copyrighted. We own the rights to all
Olympic performances. We own all Olympic venues. In fact, we own
the athletes too. ”
"With London's summer 2012
games due to take place in the very near future, you'd think that
organizers would make more of an effort and persuade people to show
more of an interest — yet it appears the complete opposite has
happened, with strict guidelines banning
athletes from posting photos of themselves on Twitter with
products that aren't official Olympics sponsors, as well as
prohibiting videos or photos to be taken from the athlete's village.
Oh and just for good measure, fans
could find themselves barred from sharing videos and photos on
Facebook and YouTube of themselves delighting in said Olympics
action."
(Related)
NBC have just announced that they will
be streaming the entire London 2012 Olympic Games online live. All
32 sports featured at the Summer Olympics will be shown live on the
NBC Olympics site.
Now TSA can play with even more data.
"The European Parliament has
approved the controversial data transfer agreement, the bilateral PNR
(passenger name register), with the US which requires European
airlines to pass
on passenger information, including name, contact details,
payment data, itinerary, email and phone numbers to the Department of
Homeland Security. Under the new agreement, PNR data will be
'depersonalized' after six months and would be moved into a 'dormant
database' after five years. However the information would still be
held for a further 15 years before being fully 'anonymized.'"
Now this could be interesting.
EPIC
demands full copy of FCC's probe of Google Street View
An Internet privacy advocacy group
wants the Federal Communications Commission to release the full
report of its investigation of Google's Street View, which collected
and stored data from unencrypted wireless networks.
The Electronic Privacy Information
Center has filed a Freedom
of Information Act request to see the commission's full 25-page
report, saying it "raised questions about the scope of the FCC's
Street View investigation." A heavily redacted version painted
Google as being too busy to respond with alacrity to its request for
information and suggested more than slight frustration.
Perspective
Survey
says 1 in 4 organizations have had issues with mobile malware
Getting a virus on your computer is bad
enough, but getting one on your phone is a whole other story. All
your personal information leaks, and sometimes that includes the
login credentials for many of the services you use. But how big of a
problem is mobile malware? Goode Intelligence has
had a go at quantifying the issue, and what they have to say
isn’t pretty: 24% of the organizations they surveyed reported that
they had to deal with infected devices during 2011. Back in 2010
that number was just 9%. How many companies enforce
the use of some sort of anti-virus software on their smartphones?
Less than 1 in 5.
A
network without hardware... Once upon a time, “networks” didn't
exist at all. If you wanted to send information from point A to
point B you needed a direct, dedicated circuit.
Vanishing
Webpage Links Google to Network Maverick Nicira
As part of its new-age system for
moving traffic between its massive data centers, Google is using a
network controller built in tandem with swashbuckling
Silicon Valley startup Nicira, according to a Google presentation
posted to the web.
On Tuesday, during a speech in Santa
Clara, California, Google’s Urs Hölzle — the man who oversees
the company’s worldwide network of data centers — revealed that
the company is now using
an open source protocol known as OpenFlow to completely overhaul
the links between the computing facilities that drive its sweeping
collection of web services, and a slide presentation that accompanied
the speech was posted to the web.
The presentation
has now been removed, but an extra slide tacked on to the end of
the file indicated that Google is driving its OpenFlow-based network
gear using a controller called Onix. (We’ve
uploaded a copy of the presentation here.) Onix serves as the
basis for the software offered by Nicira, an outfit that recently
emerged from stealth mode touting a new breed of network that exists
only as software. According to a 2010
research paper, Onix was designed by four Nicira engineers, three
Googlers, an NEC employee, and an academic who was among Nicira’s
co-founders. The top four contributors to the paper are Nicira
employees.
I
want copies...
"Two
70-year-old papers by Alan Turing on the theory of code breaking
have been released by the government's communications headquarters,
GCHQ. It is believed Turing wrote the papers while at Bletchley Park
working on breaking German Enigma codes. A GCHQ mathematician said
the fact that the contents had been restricted 'shows what a
tremendous importance it has in the foundations of our subject.'"
[From the article:
The two papers are now available to
view at the National Archives at Kew, west London. [No
electronic version? Fire up the jet, Kato. Bob]
e-Discovery,
for my Ethical Hackers...
Verifeyed
uses a camera’s ‘mathematical fingerprint’ to find manipulated
images
Image analysis startup Verifeyed
wants to bring a new a sense of legitimacy to the world of digital
images.
“Today, digital images are
everywhere. But, image editing tools like Adobe Photoshop easily
allow the creation of fake images with just a few clicks,” the
startup told VentureBeat. “As a result, digital images have lost
their trustworthiness. This situation only worsens as products such
as Photoshop become more prevalent, sophisticated, and easy to use.”
… it plans solve the problem using
its patent pending technology that is able to certify the originality
(or absence of modification) for digital images taken from any
device. Also, it uses math (a lot of it) — a product of the
founders specialty as PhD researchers in the area of applied
mathematics.
No comments:
Post a Comment