Trivial,
but ties in nicely with the next article...
By Dissent,
March 27, 2012
*sigh*
Howard University
Hospital this week sent notification to patients of a potential
disclosure of their protected health information in late January. A
former contractor’s personal laptop containing patient information
was stolen, according to a statement by the hospital.
The laptop, taken
from the former contractor’s vehicle, was password protected.
[...]
The hospital has
sent letters to 34,503 patients affected by the breach. The records
contained the Social Security numbers for a number of those patients.
Read more on WUSA9.com,
although you can probably write the story by now
yourself. [...while napping Bob]
A link on the hospital’s homepage
says:
Howard University
Hospital this week sent notification to patients of a potential
disclosure of their protected health information that occurred in
late January when a former
contractor’s personal laptop containing patient information was
stolen.
(Related)
By Dissent,
March 27, 2012
ID Experts points us to a post by
Pamela Lewis Dolan:
Physicians who own mobile devices should make the following
assumption: If they lose a smartphone or tablet,
someone is going to try to see what’s on it.
With an estimated
80% of physicians using a mobile device on the job, a lot of patient
data is vulnerable to breaches unless steps are taken to protect it.
Data encryption is the one thing that protects
physicians from having to report a breach if data go missing.
But ensuring data encryption on a mobile device can be a little
tricky. At the least, there are other ways to help ensure that data
aren’t accessed if you happen to leave your phone behind in a taxi
or at a restaurant.
Read more on amednews.com
What
kind of lawyering is this?
Proposed
lawsuit settlement includes free soft drinks
March 28, 2012 by Dissent
Jeff Eckhoff and James Heggen report:
The failure of a
Des Moines restaurant chain to fully comply with a federal
anti-identity theft law will soon lead to free soft
drinks for some of its former patrons, assuming a federal
judge approves.
Lawyers in a
complicated class-action lawsuit have submitted a proposed settlement
that will, if it is approved by U.S. District Judge James Gritzner,
eventually lead to $170,000 for the plaintiffs’
attorneys and coupons for people who can prove they used a
credit card or debit card during a three-year period at Palmer’s
Deli & Market.
The lawsuit, filed
initially on June 1, 2011, accused Palmer’s of willfully violating
a 2003 federal law that requires the truncation of credit card
numbers and expiration dates on printed store receipts.
Read more in the Des
Moines Register.
This is not the first
time we’ve seen a settlement like this. Olive
Garden had a similar one in May 2009, but the members of that
class got coupons for $9.00 worth of appetizers. And members of a
class action lawsuit against Primanti
Brothers got coupons for free sandwiches in October 2010.
Although it doesn’t seem like members of this class benefit
significantly in the usual sense of “significantly,” the
settlement may say save Palmer’s from being bankrupt should
they have to pay statutory damages. The firm’s
insurance company is also suing them, claiming they should not be
liable for any costs or expenses from this incident.
(Related)
Shouldn't the settlement reach at least a penny a victim?
FTC
releases proposed settlement order in RockYou breach; $250k fine for
breaching COPPA
March 27, 2012 by admin
The RockYou breach, disclosed in
December 2009, stands as the 10th largest breach
on DataLossDB’s counter after 32 million login credentials were
compromised. A civil suit, Claridge v. RockYou, is still
unsettled, although a proposed settlement was submitted to the court
in November 2011. Previous coverage on this breach can be found
here.
Now the FTC has issued a statement
on a proposed settlement of its charges against the firm:
The operator of a
social game site has agreed to settle charges that, while touting its
security features, it failed to protect the privacy of its users,
allowing hackers to access the personal information of 32
million users. The Federal Trade Commission also alleged
in its complaint against RockYou that RockYou
violated the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act Rule (COPPA
Rule) in collecting information from approximately 179,000
children. The proposed
FTC settlement order with the company bars future deceptive
claims by the company regarding privacy and data security, requires
it to implement and maintain a data security program, bars future
violations of the COPPA Rule, and requires it to pay a $250,000 civil
penalty to settle the COPPA charges.
The case against
RockYou is part of the FTC’s
ongoing effort to make sure companies live up to the privacy promises
they make to consumers, and that kids’
information isn’t collected or shared online without their parents’
consent.
According to the
FTC complaint, RockYou operated a website that allowed consumers to
play games and use other applications. Many consumers used the site
to assemble slide shows from their photos, using a caption capability
and music supplied by the site. To save their slide shows, consumers
had to enter their email address and email password.
[email is an identifier, what purpose does sharing the password
serve? Bob]
The FTC’s COPPA
Rule requires that website operators notify parents and obtain their
consent before they collect, use, or disclose personal information
from children under 13. The Rule also requires that website
operators post a privacy policy that is clear, understandable, and
complete.
The FTC alleged
that RockYou knowingly collected approximately 179,000 children’s
email addresses and associated passwords during registration –
without their parents’ consent – and enabled children to create
personal profiles and post personal information on slide shows that
could be shared online. The company asked for kids’ date of birth,
and so accepted registrations from kids under 13. In addition, the
company’s security failures put users’ including children’s
personal information at risk, according to the FTC. The FTC charged
that RockYou violated the COPPA Rule by:
- not spelling out its collection, use and disclosure policy for children’s information;
- not obtaining verifiable parental consent before collecting children’s personal information; and
- not maintaining reasonable procedures, such as encryption to protect the confidentiality, security, and integrity of personal information collected from children.
The proposed
settlement order bars deceptive claims regarding privacy and data
security and requires RockYou to implement a data security program
and submit to security audits by independent
third-party auditors every other year for 20 years. [Ask any
accounting firm to do this – it will probably save you more than
$250,000 Bob] It also requires RockYou to delete
information collected from children under age 13 and bars violations
of COPPA. Finally, RockYou will pay a $250,000 civil penalty for its
alleged COPPA violations.
The FTC has a new
publication, Living
Life Online, to help tweens and teens navigate the internet
safely.
The Commission
vote to authorize the staff to refer the complaint to the Department
of Justice and to approve the proposed consent decree was 4-0. The
DOJ filed the complaint and proposed consent decree on behalf of the
Commission in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
California on March 26, 2012. The proposed consent decree is subject
to court approval.
So… if it wasn’t for the children’s
data, would the FTC have gone after RockYou or fined them? The
passwords were stored plain-text, but the only reference to
encryption in this release applies to children’s data, not the
adults’.
Update: I see that in
his coverage of the proposed order, Jaikumar
Vijayan reports that the civil suit against RockYou settled in
December. If he’s referring to Claridge v. RockYou, the
motion for settlement is due to be heard tomorrow (March 28).
Now Perry Mason doesn't need to ask,
“Where were you on the night of the crime?”
Want
to know where your teen is? Ask OnStar
If you're nervous about giving your
teen driver the keys to the family car, you may be able to buy peace
of mind from OnStar. The telematics company now offers the ability
to tell you where your vehicles, and possibly the drivers, are at any
time.
Family Link is an optional add-on
service to the operator assisted emergency response and navigation
services offered by OnStar. Subscribers can log on to OnStar's
Family Link Web site to view a map with the vehicle's location at any
time. They can also schedule email or text alerts to update them
periodically on the location of the automobile on specific days or
times.
If they had trained their officers in a
misinterpretation of the
law, I can't see how they could be disciplined for following their
training. So it appears they had no training in that area.
"The City of Boston has reached
a $170,000 settlement with Simon Glik, who was arrested by Boston
Police in 2007 after using his mobile phone to record police
arresting another man on Boston Common. Police
claimed that Glik had violated state wiretapping laws,
but later dropped the charges and admitted
the officers were wrong to arrest him. Glik had brought a
lawsuit against the city (aided by the ACLU) because he claimed his
civil rights were violated. According to today's ACLU statement: 'As
part of the settlement, Glik agreed to withdraw his appeal to the
Community Ombudsman Oversight Panel. He had complained about the
Internal Affairs Division's investigation of his complaint and the
way they treated him. IAD officers made fun of Glik for filing the
complaint, telling him his only remedy was filing a civil lawsuit.
After the City spent years in court defending
the officers' arrest of Glik as constitutional and reasonable, IAD
reversed course after the
First Circuit ruling and disciplined two of the officers for
using "unreasonable judgment" in arresting Glik.'"
The downside of building your own
country to avoid the laws of other countries is...
"Ars has a great article about
the history of Sealand, a data haven — a place where you can host
almost anything, as long as it follows the very bare laws of Sealand
Government. Quoting: 'HavenCo's failure — and make no mistake
about it, HavenCo did fail — shows
how hard it is to get out from under government's thumb. HavenCo
built it, but no one came. For a host of reasons, ranging from its
physical vulnerability to the fact that The Man doesn't care where
you store your data if he can get his hands on you, Sealand was never
able to offer the kind of immunity from law that digital rebels
sought. And, paradoxically, by seeking to avoid government, HavenCo
made
itself exquisitely vulnerable (PDF) to one government in
particular: Sealand's.'"
This is as old as the “razors and
blades” model – probably older (Og give you fire. You give Og
mastodon steaks!)
Temple
Run and the Rise
of the Free, Profitable Videogame
… When Apple launched its digital
game store in 2008, most games cost a few dollars. The success of
99-cent apps drove prices down. Then in 2009, Apple changed its
store to allow free downloads to feature in-app purchases, for the
first time making it possible to give away a game and
make money later.
Now free is the most lucrative price
point. From kids’ games like Smurfs’ Village to
puzzles like Bejeweled Blitz, 15 of the first 20 games
on Apple’s Top-Grossing Apps list are free. The analyst group
Distimo estimates that half
of the revenue for the 200 top-grossing apps comes from the freemium
model. Everyone from indie game developers to established
companies is jumping on the freemium bandwagon.
… The released Temple Run on
the App Store in August for 99 cents.
It did well, at first. “It got a ton
of critical acclaim, it got featured [on the App Store menu], people
loved it,” says Luckyanova. Temple Run was one of the
top 50 paid apps. The couple sold about 40,000
copies at 99 cents a pop. But then it started sliding
down the list. With little to lose, Shepherd and Luckyanova abruptly
changed the price to zero, hoping to make
money by getting players to trade real-life cash for virtual
currency.
Revenue immediately
increased. People told their friends — hey, play this
game. It’s free. You can grab it right now. By Christmas, it was
the top-grossing app on the store. “It snowballed into a viral
effect,” says Shepherd. The game is now at 46
million free downloads — and Shepherd and Luckyanova
estimate that 1 to 3 percent of players wind up
spending money on the game.
My Ethical Hackers can hack your phone
in 1 minute 50 seconds! I mean, a “four digit passcode?”
"Micro Systemation, a
Stockholm-based company, has released a video showing that its
software can easily
bypass the iPhone's four-digit passcode in a matter of seconds.
It can also crack Android phones, and is designed to dump the
devices' data to a PC for easy browsing, including messages, GPS
locations, web history, calls, contacts and keystroke logs. The
company's director of marketing says it uses an undisclosed
vulnerability in the devices it targets to run a program on the phone
that brute-forces its passcode. He says the company's business is
'booming' and that it's sold the devices to law enforcement and
military customers in 60 countries. He says Micro Systemation's
biggest customer is the U.S. military."
Since
China is in flux (to the point where civil war is possible?) are
stories like these just a way for the government to admit publicly
what we kind of knew anyway but no one wanted to say for fear of
“offending” the Chinese government?
China
nabbing 'great deal' of U.S. military secrets
Testifying before the Senate Armed
Services Committee yesterday, Gen. Alexander said that China
is stealing a "great deal" of the U.S. military's
intellectual property, adding that the NSA sees "thefts from
defense industrial base companies." According to a story in
Information Week, he declined to provide any information on those
attacks. However, he did confirm speculation swirling around the
security space that China
was behind last year's attacks on RSA.
The
world is changing, again...
Harry
Potter And The Great Sideloading Gamble. A ‘Dark Day’ For
Publishers?
A milestone today in the world of
publishing, as Pottermore.com,
the site dedicated to all digital things Harry Potter, opened for
business as the exclusive distributor of Harry Potter e-books and
audiobooks. This marks the first time that a major author has
ventured forth to offer e-books directly to the public, bypassing
publishers’ sites and online bookstores in the process, to allow
readers to buy the content direct and then sideload it to their
reading platform of choice.
...let's
change it even more. Something for all my students.
Perspective
An Infographic
What
Happens In An Internet Minute?
Something
for my geeks? (No RSS feed yet)
You may have noticed that we've posted
quite a few original videos on Slashdot in the past few months.
Rather than being the work of a few rogue editors with newly-acquired
Christmas cameras, this was part of the groundwork for a new site
we're launching today. SlashdotTV,
found at http://tv.slashdot.org,
will let you easily find and watch all of our videos in one
convenient location. In addition to Slashdot content, you also can
watch videos from our sister sites, SourceForge
and ThinkGeek. The site is
brand new, and we're interested in hearing your feedback -- what you
think about it, and what kind of videos you'd like to see.
Currently, you can embed our videos on your own site
or show them to your friends with our share feature.
Commenting is coming soon. Check back often for new videos, and keep
watching!
[Learn fun things like:
An interesting start-up...
Skillshare
Says Anyone Can Be A Teacher And Wants To Connect You To Students
[TCTV]
Arthur
C. Clarke wrote, “Any sufficiently advanced technology is
indistinguishable from magic.” This video show what can happen
when you combine technology with magic...
No comments:
Post a Comment