Wholesale hacking for my Ethical
Hackers... “Quantity has a quality all its own” Stalin
"More than 70,000 websites were
compromised
in a recent breach of InMotion. Thousands of websites were
defaced and others had alterations made to give users a hard time
accessing their accounts and fixing the damage. A
similar attack hit JustHost back in June, and in a breach of
Australian Web host DistributeIT just prior to that, hackers
completely deleted more than 4,800 websites that the company was
unable to recover. The incidents raise concern that hacker
groups are bypassing single targets and hitting Web hosts directly,
giving them access to tens of thousands of websites,
rather than single targets. While the attacks have caused damage,
they weren't as malicious as they could have been. Rather than
defacing and deleting, hackers could have quietly planted malware in
the sites or stolen customer data. Web hosting companies could be
one of the largest holes in non-government cybersecurity, since
malicious hackers can gain access through openings left by the Web
host, regardless of the security of a given site."
It wouldn't surprise me if “approval
prior to publication” was a real policy, but it would be impossible
to implement.
"An employee of the State
Department is under investigation and may
be fired for 'disclosing classified information.' Or, as others
might call it, posting a link to WikiLeaks. 'His crime, he said, was
a link he posted on August 25 in a blog post discussing the hypocrisy
of recent U.S. actions against Libyan leader Muammar Qadaffi. The
link went to a 2009 cable about the sale of U.S. military spare parts
to Qadaffi through a Portuguese middleman. ... The State Department
investigators, he said, demanded
to know who had helped him with his blog and told him that every
blog post, Facebook post, and tweet by State Department employees had
to be pre-cleared by the Department prior to publication."
What logic, if any, is being applied
here? Are they saying that because technology makes it easy to
commit a crime they have to reduce the level of the crime from felony
to “shame on you?” Is society suddenly less damaged? Are we
telling children that it is now “no big deal?” (As long as you
send the cops a copy?)
SonicSpike sends word that Florida has
changed
how law enforcement deals with teenagers who send racy pictures
to each other over their phones. Quoting CNN:
"Before
Saturday, a Florida teenager who sent or received nude photos or
video could have been charged with a felony and forced to register as
a sex offender. But a new law, recognizing the proliferation of cell
phones and computers, eases the penalties for 'sexting' infractions.
A first offense is punishable by eight hours of community service or
a $60 fine; the second is a misdemeanor and the third is a felony.
... Under House Bill 75, teens who receive explicit images won't be
charged if they took reasonable steps to
report it, did not solicit the image and did not
send it to someone."
(Related) Too little too late?
"Hal
in 2001:
'I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that [open the pod bay
doors].' Kinect in 2011: 'I'm sorry, Dave Jr. I'm afraid I can't do
that [tune in to the Spice
Channel].' A Microsoft patent filing made public this week
proposes to restrict
access to TV, movies and video games by using a 3D depth camera to
estimate viewers' ages based upon the dimensions and proportions
of a person's body, such as head width to shoulder width, and torso
length to overall height. For adults with short arms or other
seemingly childlike proportions, settings can be overridden by
someone with an administrator password."
Asking for new competitors? AT&T
is stating that they don't benefit from heavy users. (More
correctly, they benefit more from casual users) Clearly someone
does. Perhaps one of the many companies that profit from ad views
(Google, Facebook, etc.) will take action to ensure their cash cow
keeps producing.
"AT&T has started
tossing out warnings for users that fall
into the top 5% of data users on their wireless network. AT&T
announced this change back
in July and is now starting to actually enforce it."
Easier than the University system.
Minus:
Extremely Simple File Sharing With 10GB of Free Online Storage
Drag some files into your browser and
instantly get a link to share them with family or friends. It’s
this simplicity, along with a staggering 10GB of free storage space,
that puts Minus among the best file sharing tools on the web today.
Last December we
profiled the then-new photo sharing tool Minus. The web app only
worked for photos then. Almost a year later and Minus does so much
more. With support for any file format, apps for all major platforms
and a very generous amount of free online storage, Minus is the
solution to the file sharing problem.
… Head to minus.com
to get started. You can drag files to your browser to get uploaded
right away, but I highly recommend you first get an account. Once
you do you’ll see your dashboard, containing all the folders you’ve
uploaded. Uploading another file, or collection of files, is as
simple as dragging it or them from your computer’s file browser to
your web browser window:
No comments:
Post a Comment