Perspective.
https://www.theregister.com/2025/09/29/uk_russia_cyber_war/
UK
may already be at war with Russia, ex-MI5 head suggests
The
former head of MI5 says hostile cyberattacks and intelligence
operations directed by The Kremlin indicate the UK might already be
at war with Russia.
Baroness
Manningham-Buller, who served as Director General of the intelligence
agency from 2002 to 2007 and was the second woman to fill the role,
made the claim on Lord Speaker's Corner, the podcast
of the House of Lords.
She
was referencing previous comments from Fiona Hill, the
British-American foreign affairs expert who advised the White House
on Vladimir Putin and Russia during Donald Trump's first term.
"Since
the invasion of Ukraine, and the various things I read that the
Russians have been doing here, sabotage, intelligence collection,
attacking people, and so on... Fiona Hill, I think she may be right
in saying we're already at war with Russia," the Baroness told
podcast host Lord McFall of Alcluith.
"It's
a different sort of war, but the hostility, the cyberattacks, the
physical attacks, intelligence work, is extensive," she said.
(Related)
https://www.ft.com/content/0b351091-3f82-4f2f-bef2-a52a35f009f2?accessToken=zwAGP7EDMlsokc8LNRCRP4JPL9O-8qUqNfAJ8g.MEUCIQDNxAazoaM1u-aorgcHRS-I0yr9AFHC9yfOGfeUoUKTuQIgHbWuOdECv22YavmdfpPAzUtBEOadQ6WK4TW-VcqSum4&sharetype=gift&token=fdaa0fae-cfe1-4031-bdb1-2cf8af69eae1
The
Russian spy ship stalking Europe’s subsea cables
Last
November, a distinctive blue and white vessel set sail from a
secluded inlet of Russia’s Kola Peninsula on a three-month voyage.
The ship, seemingly a civilian craft, sailed around Norway, down the
English Channel and up into the Irish Sea, before looping southwards
to the Mediterranean and east towards Suez.
But
this was no pleasure cruise of Europe’s Atlantic coastline:
Moscow’s military spy ship Yantar, kitted with a full armoury of
surveillance equipment, was on a mission to map and potentially
intercept the undersea cables on which Nato allies rely for internet
access, energy, military communications and financial transactions.
Perspective.
https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2025/09/artificial-intelligence-may-not-be-artificial/
Artificial
intelligence may not be artificial
The
term artificial intelligence renders the sense that what computers do
is either inferior to or at least apart from human intelligence. AI
researcher Blaise
Agüera y Arcas argues
that may not be the case.
Agüera
y Arcas, Google’s CTO of technology and society, traced the
evolution of both human and artificial intelligence in ways that seem
to mirror each other as part of a Wednesday event sponsored by
Harvard Law School’s Berkman
Klein Center for Internet & Society.
“Why
has the computational power of brains, not just of AI models, grown
explosively throughout evolution?” said Agüera y Arcas, the author
of the new book “What Is Intelligence? Lessons from AI About
Evolution, Computing, and Minds.” “If we rewind 500 million
years, we see only things with very small brains, and if we go back a
billion years, we see no brains at all.”
According
to Agüera y Arcas, human brains evolved to be computational, meaning
that they process information by transforming various kinds of inputs
into signals or outputs, and that most of the computation that brains
do takes the form of predictions, which is what AI systems do.
“I
hear a lot of people say that it’s a metaphor to talk about brains
as computers,” said Agüera y Arcas. “I don’t mean this
metaphorically. I mean it very literally … The premise of
computational neuroscience is that what brains do is process
information, not that they are like computers, but that they are
computers.”