Sunday, May 18, 2014

Is it worth it to China? Probably. On the other hand, Vietnam may not be able to afford this fight – doesn't mean they won't fight anyway. Reads a bit like European colonialism – see an asset, claim it, dare anyone to argue. (Works in Russian too)
China evacuates thousands of citizens from Vietnam after deadly attacks
China has evacuated more than 3,000 of its citizens from Vietnam and is sending ships to retrieve more of them after deadly anti-Chinese violence erupted last week over a territorial dispute between the two countries.
Foreign factories, particularly those run by companies from China and Taiwan, were burned and looted by rioters outraged over Beijing's decision to send an oil rig into waters of the South China Sea that both countries claim as sovereign territory.

Lots of individuals or a global organization? Not clear how many targeted were users vs. dealers.
Danny Yadron and Christopher Matthews report:
The Federal Bureau of Investigation and foreign police agencies have launched a series of raids around the world at the homes of people linked to a type of hacking software called Blackshades, according to posts on hacker forums and people familiar with the investigation.
The software is what experts call a “rat”—remote access tool—that allows people to control computers from a distance. The targets of the raids are suspected of buying and selling Blackshades and were subjected to searches and seizures in recent days, according to people familiar with the case.
The searches are part of a coordinated crackdown on an international ring of suspected criminal hackers, according to the people familiar with the probe. Federal prosecutors in New York plan to announce the results of the raids as soon as Monday, said those familiar with the situation.
Read more on WSJ.
[From the article:
Blackshades can be used for legitimate purposes, such as accessing a work computer from home. When used for illegal means, however, it can allow hackers to access files on a computer, track keyboard strokes to learn passwords or even to take over a computer's camera.
Hackers sometimes use the software to take over of a computer and then demand a ransom to return control, said law-enforcement officials and computer security experts.
The software is one of hundreds of hacking tools for sale in a "robust arms bazaar," Mr. Kellerman said. "The elite hackers of 2014 have evolved to become developers of crime kits as there is an economy of scale around the provision of cyberattack capabilities."
The raids came in recent days and sometimes targeted students.

Worth reading...
Rethink The Right To Be Forgotten
There are better ways to address discomfort with the truth than government-mandated lying.
The "right to be forgotten," recognized in Article 17 of the European Union's revision of its 1995 data protection rules, is at once admirable and asinine.
Forgetfulness is often a prerequisite for forgiveness, and there are many instances when an individual or an organization deserves forgiveness. It wouldn't be particularly helpful if a search for "IBM," for example, returned as its top result a link to a website about the company's business with the Nazi regime. Forgetfulness is enshrined in judicial practices like the sealing of court records for juvenile offenders. It has real social value.
European lawmakers are right to recognize this, but their attempt to force forgetfulness on Internet companies is horribly misguided. The right to be forgotten will cause real social harm, to say nothing of the economic and moral cost.
… According to the BBC, Google has received information removal demands from: an ex-politician seeking reelection who doesn't want people to read about his behavior while in office; a man convicted of possessing child abuse images who doesn't want people to read about his conviction; and a doctor who doesn't want people reading negative reviews of his practice.
These individuals may not have claims supported by Article 17, which allows data to be retained for a legitimate purpose and is ostensibly not about erasing history or restricting the press. But this is only the beginning of an inevitable flood of such requests. And because the law allows fines that can reach up to 5% of annual revenue, companies are going to err on the side of caution.
In a Facebook post, EU Justice Commissioner Viviane Reding celebrated the court decision, noting that "The data belongs to the individual, not to the company. And unless there is a good reason to retain this data, an individual should be empowered – by law – to request erasure of this data."
Reding is asserting a dangerous new intellectual property right here.

How much is too much? Is there a reasonable limit to what a search engine – or any other Internet service can demand in exchange for free access?
Google Will Use Your Profile Information In Their Ads – Unless You Opt Out
Google has just updated their terms of service allowing them to use your Google profile information in their ads. Which is worrying, because who really reads terms and conditions?
what Google fails to realise is that perhaps you don’t want your “friends” to know that you have +1′d a new song or album.

I don't see much in the article, but apparently this guy was sharing (copyrighted?) files so the court thought it okay to share them with the police? Again, what you do publicly isn't private. notes this opinion from the Northern District of Georgia:
Several courts have rejected the application of Jones to the investigation of file sharing programs,” United States v. Brashear, Criminal No. 4:11-CR-0062, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 163865, 2013 WL 6065326, at *3 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 18, 2013) (citations omitted), and the Court finds the reasoning of these cases persuasive. The government did not use a tracking device, such as at issue in Jones; instead, it merely obtained information publicly available on shared files via a software program that connected with defendant’s computer on which defendant had installed a file-sharing program.” United States v. Dennis, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65694 (N.D. Ga. April 7, 2014).*

Perhaps a really, really detailed outline of all possible approaches to privacy regulation... Then we could say, “This law is a 2,7, 29b, and a 34! and have some idea what it requires. (I would want to do something like that if I was going to write a “lawyer replacement” App.
From Hogan Lovells Chronicle of Data Protection:
Internet service providers, social media websites, search engines, and other online companies hosting user-generated content that do business in Brazil or collect information online from Brazilian consumers should be aware of the “Marco Civil da Internet,” or Brazilian Internet Law, that takes effect 23 June 2014. As detailed in an alert published by attorneys from the Hogan Lovells Washington, D.C., São Paulo, and Rio de Janeiro offices, while Brazil still does not have a comprehensive privacy law, the Brazilian Internet Law contains privacy requirements that broadly restrict these companies from the sharing of users’ personal information, their communications, and certain online logging data. Covered companies will, however, be required to retain Web logs for a period of time and protect the user-related information they hold.

“It's for the children!” No, wait I mean..
“There are some things man was not meant to know!” No, that's not it either...
“Governments have valid reasons for keeping military capabilities secret.” There, I like that one. What do you mean, “Citizens aren't the enemy” How do we know that until we surveil them for a few lifetimes?
Trevor Timm writes:
If you blinked this week, you might have missed the news: two Senators accused the Justice Department of lying about NSA warrantless surveillance to the US supreme court last year, and those falsehoods all but ensured that mass spying on Americans would continue. But hardly anyone seems to care – least of all those who lied and who should have already come forward with the truth.
Read more on The Guardian.

Is this what got the Executive Editor fired? If so, perhaps every CEO and Board member should read it and consider where they are...
Commentary on the impact of the leaked New York Times Innovation Report
by Sabrina I. Pacifici on May 17, 2014
Joshua Benton, director of the Nieman Journalism Lab, May 15, 2014: “There are few things that can galvanize the news world’s attention like a change in leadership atop The New York Times. Jill Abramson’s ouster yesterday afternoon probably reduced American newsroom productivity enough to skew this quarter’s GDP numbers. We don’t typically write about intra-newsroom politics at Nieman Lab, leaving that to Manhattan’s very capable cadre of media reporters. But Abramson’s removal and Dean Baquet’s ascent has apparently inspired someone inside the Times to leak one of the most remarkable documents I’ve seen in my years running the Lab, to Myles Tanzer at BuzzFeed. It’s the full report of the newsroom innovation team that was given six full months to ask big questions about the Times’ digital strategy. (A summary version of it was leaked last week, but this is the big kahuna.)
[From BuzzFeed:
“They are ahead of us in building impressive support systems for digital journalists, and that gap will grow unless we quickly improve our capabilities,” the report warns. “Meanwhile, our journalism advantage is shrinking as more of these upstarts expand their newsrooms.”
“We are not moving with enough urgency,” it says.

Perspective. (Infographic)
How Do You Internet?
Did you know that 93% of all Internet users begin their session with a Web search? Do you do the same? Two thirds of all search engine users believe that search engines are unbiased, but do you really know how search engines work? Worst of all, this infographic indicates that Internet Explorer is still being used by 57.88% of online users – shocking, but somehow correlates with our poll results.

For my students.
Everything You Need To Know About Unlocking iPhones
If you bought your iPhone direct from Apple, you’ve got an unlocked phone that’s good for use with any carrier. But what if you bought it second-hand, through a network provider or on a contract?
There’s a good chance your carrier wants to limit what you can do with the hardware they have supplied you, and that means keeping you as a customer by simply denying access to other networks. Don’t stand for this telco nonsense – take the power back.

My weekly shot of education humor!
… The Obama Administration has unveiled a new $75 million fund to “spur innovation in higher education.” [Can I get my students a grant? TBD Bob]
… “MOOCs: Expectations and Reality” (PDF): “To date, there has been little evidence collected that would allow an assessment of whether MOOCs do indeed provide a cost-effective mechanism for producing desirable educational outcomes at scale. It is not even clear that these are the goals of those institutions offering MOOCs.”
… The Kansas Board of Regents has finalized its new social media policy restricting what public employees, including university professors, can say, including anything “contrary to the best interests of the university.”
Google chairman Eric Schmidt has been appointed to a three-person commission to advise New York on the use of technology in schools. God, I’m so glad that there’s no insidery bullshit in ed-tech.

No comments: