Closer.
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2021/02/virginia-is-about-to-get-a-major-california-style-data-privacy-law/
Virginia
is about to get a major California-style data privacy law
… If
adopted, the Consumer
Data Protection Act would
apply to entities of a certain size that do business in Virginia or
have users based in Virginia
…
Legislatures
in several other states—including Minnesota,
New
York,
North
Dakota, Oklahoma,
and Washington
—have
some kind of data privacy bills currently under consideration.
(Related)
https://www.pogowasright.org/broad-new-data-privacy-legislation-supported-by-florida-governor-and-house-speaker/
Broad
New Data Privacy Legislation Supported by Florida Governor and House
Speaker
Hayden
R. Dempsey and Kate Black of Greenberg Traurig, LLP write:
On Feb. 15, Gov. Ron DeSantis and House
Speaker Chris Sprowls held a press conference to announce their
support for legislation that would significantly increase data
privacy and security regulation and create new rights for Florida
consumers with respect to their personal information (PI).
House
Bill 969 by
Rep. Fiona McFarland (R-Sarasota) would apply to any for-profit
business that collects PI about Florida residents and satisfies one
or more of the following thresholds: (a) has annual revenue over $25
million, (b) collects 50% or more of its revenue from selling or
sharing PI, or (c) sells or shares the PI of 50,000 or more consumers
or devices. If passed, the law will take effect Jan. 1, 2022.
Read
more on National
Law Review.
Probably
not the answer, but likely one component.
https://www.zdnet.com/article/defence-lists-cyber-mitigation-as-key-factor-for-building-ethical-ai/
Defence
lists cyber mitigation as key factor for building ethical AI
The
Australian Department of Defence has released a new report on its
findings for how to reduce the ethical risk of artificial
intelligence projects, noting that cyber mitigation will be key to
maintaining the trust and integrity of autonomous systems.
The
report was drafted following concerns from Defence that failure to
adopt emerging technologies in a timely manner could result in
military disadvantage, while premature adoption without sufficient
research and analysis could result in inadvertent harms.
"Significant
work is required to ensure that introducing the technology does not
result in adverse outcomes," Defence said in the report
[PDF].
… In
the report, participants have jointly created five
key considerations – trust, responsibility, governance, law,
traceability – that they believe are essential during
the development of any ethical AI project.
Get
out there and do something?
https://www.brookings.edu/research/strengthening-international-cooperation-on-artificial-intelligence/
Strengthening
international cooperation on artificial intelligence
I
am curious to see the reaction. Facebook users will notice, but will
news organizations care?
https://www.makeuseof.com/facebook-bans-news-australia-over-proposed-legislation/
Facebook
Bans News in Australia Over Proposed Legislation
… Facebook
previously cut a deal with the UK and
agreed to pay news publishers, which is why it's surprising that
Facebook wasn't able to do the same in Australia.
Facebook's
ban on news is exactly what it sounds like; the platform will no
longer display news articles in Australia. While this might help
users escape from constantly hearing about politics or the latest
controversy, it could also prove irritating when trying to share a
story with a friend or family member.
The
ban on news means that no news, whether local, national, or global,
will be displayed on the platform. Easton outlined these
restrictions in more detail, stating that "people and news
organisations in Australia are now restricted from posting news links
and sharing or viewing Australian and international news content on
Facebook."
(Related) Governments have Facebook accounts too.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-02-18/bom-health-authorities-betoota-caught-in-facebook-news-ban/13166394?section=technology
Posts
disappear from pages of health authorities, Bureau of Meteorology
amid Facebook news ban
… Some
pages that don't fit the traditional news genre were stripped out as
part of the stoush
between Facebook and the federal government over
whether the social media company should pay for Australian content it
runs on its site.
In
response to the outages, Facebook said government pages should not be
hit by the changes. A spokesperson said any inadvertently impacted
pages would be fixed.
"As
the law does not provide clear guidance on the definition of news
content, we have taken a broad definition in order to
respect the law as drafted," the spokesperson said in a
statement.
(Related)
https://www.platformer.news/p/facebook-calls-australias-bluff
Facebook
calls Australia's bluff
Yesterday,
I wrote that Australia’s
News Media Bargaining Code threatened to splinter the internet.
On Wednesday morning, the splintering arrived: Google cut a deal
with News Corp. that will ensure its services continue to be provided
in Australia, and Facebook walked away from the bargaining table and
began preventing people from sharing news links from Australian
publishers around the world.
I
think Facebook basically did the right thing, and Google basically
did the wrong thing, even though Google had a much tougher call to
make. Today, let’s talk about why the tech giants made the
decisions that they did, why Australia’s shakedown is rotten, and
what’s likely to happen next. (If you didn’t read
my piece on the subject yesterday,
it offers a lot of useful context for what follows. I’ve made it
free for all subscribers to read.)
User interface design: too easy to use?
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2021/02/citibank-just-got-a-500-million-lesson-in-the-importance-of-ui-design/
Citibank
just got a $500 million lesson in the importance of UI design
Citibank was trying
to make $7.8M in interest payments. It sent $900M instead.
A
federal judge has ruled
that
Citibank isn't entitled to the return of $500 million it sent to
various creditors last August. Kludgey software and a poorly designed
user interface contributed to the massive screwup.
Citibank
was acting as an agent for Revlon, which owed hundreds of millions of
dollars to various creditors. On August 11, Citibank was supposed to
send out interest payments totaling $7.8 million to these creditors.
However,
Revlon was in the process of refinancing its debt—paying off a few
creditors while rolling the rest of its debt into a new loan. And
this, combined with the confusing interface of financial software
called Flexcube, led the bank to accidentally pay back the principal
on the entire loan—most of which wasn't due until 2023.