Somehow,
this report does not give me a warm, fuzzy feeling. What happened?
Did they only look for evidence that Russia interfered?
Feds:
No Evidence Hackers Disrupted North Carolina Voting
A
federal investigation didn’t
turn up any evidence that cyber attacks were responsible
for computer errors that disrupted voting in a North Carolina county
in 2016, according to a report issued Monday.
The
U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s report said it didn’t
identify any malware or remote access to the Durham County Board of
Elections systems that it analyzed.
… Laptops
used in some Durham County precincts on Election Day in November 2016
showed inaccurate data to poll workers, such as erroneously
identifying voters as having already voted and identifying registered
voters as being unregistered.
Even
a lawyer should have figured this out.
Vadodara
lawyer loses Rs 70,000 in cyber fraud, many more cheated.
… Dave
said that he had received a message on WhatsApp from one Naveen Kumar
on December 25 asking him for registration of his marriage. Kumar
told Dave that he had found his number through a search portal
providing contact details of different service providers.
Dave
responded to Kumar on Saturday and informed him about the documents
which he would need for registration. During the conversation, Kumar
told Dave that he works in the Indian Army currently posted in Delhi
and would be coming to Vadodara on January 1. When Dave said that he
would charge Rs 5,000 for the registration and asked him to transfer
money through Google Pay, Kumar said that he will have to verify
first.
Kumar
asked him to transfer Rs 20,000 in his army camp’s bank account
saying he would transfer it back. “I
transferred Rs 20,000 four times but every time he said that the
transaction has failed and no money was received by him.
I then transferred just Rs 10,000,” Dave told TOI. Although he
received an sms intimating that Rs 90,000 had been debited from his
account, he got only Rs 20,000 back. “I have only received sms of
credit, but there is no entry of it in my passbook,” Dave said.
As
Dave informed about this fraud in a WhatsApp group of lawyers,
several other lawyers came forward saying that they too were conned
similarly.
It
ain’t easy.
How
to spot a bot (or not)
First
Draft – The
main indicators of online automation, co-ordination and inauthentic
activity.
“First Draft has put together a number of indicators that might
suggest — but not proof — automated activity online. Bot
detection is no simple task… From talking
with academics and researchers, studying
the
work
of
others,
and carrying out our own
investigations,
First Draft has put together a list of indicators to help anyone
identify suspicious online activity. The list of indicators is
broken down by category: the account’s pattern of activity, account
information, content posted by the account, and network of other
accounts it may be a part of. Within each category are different
metrics which are red flags for automation…”
Just
another tool. (Where would Amazon see your hands?)
Amazon
files patent for tech to identify you using the veins in your hand
USA
Today:
“What if you could pay for your groceries using your veins?
Amazon filed a patent for technology that could identify you by
scanning the wrinkles
in the palm of your hand
and by using a light to see beneath
your skin to your blood vessels.
The resulting images could be used to identify you as a shopper at
Amazon Go stores. It was previously
reported that
the Seattle-based tech giant might install these hi-tech scanners in
Whole Foods grocery stores. However, the U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office published an application on Thursday that suggests the
e-commerce behemoth sets its sites on Amazon Go stores. Many of the
inventors named on the application include Amazon Go executives such
as vice president Dili Kumar and senior manager Manoj Aggarwal.
Engineer Nikolai Orlov, who previously lead Amazon Go projects, was
also listed as an inventor…”
On
the other hand, technology works both ways.
Will
the digital age kill off spying? CIA in crisis as facial recognition,
biometrics and AI make it increasingly difficult for agents to
maintain their cover abroad
- Some foreign governments no longer see the need to physically follow CIA officers because facial recognition and surveillance is so advanced
- U.S. intelligence agencies are facing a growing crisis because developments in technology are making it increasingly more difficult to conceal operatives
- Given the advances in technology, some intelligence officials across the world are now simply hiding in plain sight using their real identities
Perspective.
IN
A NEW MILESTONE, THE INTERNET WILL ACCOUNT FOR HALF OF AD SPENDING IN
2020
For
the first time,
the internet in 2020 will account for more than
half of both U.S. and worldwide ad spending.
That’s
a key takeaway from Ad Age Marketing Fact Pack 2020, our annual guide
to marketers, media and agencies. You can download a free
copy at
AdAge.com
/resources.
For
my students, mostly.
No comments:
Post a Comment