Saturday, April 27, 2019


The rest of the world seems to be going in the opposite direction.
Those who want to see HHS/OCR come down like a ton of bricks on more entities and impose heavier civil monetary penalties for HIPAA breaches will likely not be happy to learn that HHS has decided to reduce the maximum civil penalties it will impose for the four tiers of violations of HIPAA.
[Tables omitted. Bob]
HHS’s notification, which will be published in the Federal Register on April 30, explains their reasoning and justification for exercising their discretion in this way. I’ve reproduced the notification, below.




I think we’ve found a title for the Fall Privacy Foundation seminar… What are humans for? Register to listen to the podcast.
As AI advances, what are humans for?
The wary relationship between humans and technology is also at the heart of Mr McEwan’s new novel, “Machines like Me” (reviewed by The Economist here ).
In an interview with “The Economist Asks” podcast, he reflects on the moral quandaries of differentiating between synthetic and biological humans and his own on-off relationship with technology.




A good summary.
Here’s how Internet of Things malware is undermining privacy
There are several aspects to the problem. One is that devices with microphones and cameras may be monitoring what people say and do directly. Sometimes users may not even be aware that there is a microphone present, as happened with Google’s Nest. Another is the leakage of sensitive information from the data streams of IoT devices. Finally, there is the problem summed up by what is called by some “Hyppönen’s law: “Whenever an appliance is described as being ‘smart’, it’s vulnerable”.
Existing legislation may provide a more effective way of tackling IoT’s threat to privacy. As readers of this blog know, the EU’s GDPR law is proving to be a powerful weapon for defending personal data and tackling abuses. It may be that the GDPR can be used to curb some of the worst problems of IoT systems, at least in Europe.




Kinda like a Berlin wall, but an e-wall.
The Quick Read About… Russia’s New Internet Law
This law will regulate how internet traffic moves through critical infrastructure for the internet. By November internet service providers will have to adopt new routing and filtering technology and grant regulators the authority to directly monitor and censor content it deems objectionable. But the real groundbreaker is the intent to create a national domain name system (DNS) by 2021, probably as a back-up to the existing global system that translates domain names into numerical addresses. If Russia builds a workable version and switches it on, traffic would not enter or leave Russia’s borders. In effect, it means turning on a standalone Russian internet, disconnected from the rest of the world.
Read this excellent piece by GZERO Media’s Alex Kliment on the pros and cons of shutting down the internet in times of emergency. Folks in the Kremlin should read it, too.


(Related) On the other hand…
Telecom giants battle bill which bans Internet service throttling for firefighters in emergencies
Internet service providers (ISPs) and telecom firms are fighting a bill which would force them to provide unfettered broadband services and prevent them from throttling data use in emergency situations.
… As reported by StateScoop, the bill – introduced in February – aims to prevent a repeat of what happened in summer 2018 during the Mendocino Complex Fire, one of the largest wildfires recorded in California's history.
During the blaze, which erupted in July, two combined fires burned a combined 459,123 acres, destroyed 280 structures, and resulted in the death of one firefighter, as reported by the Sacramento Bee.
As firefighters from the Santa Clara County Central Fire Protection District fought to contain the fires, they found their Internet service drastically reduced, having been throttled in what Verizon Wireless later called a "customer support mistake."
… Verizon said at the time that the company has an internal policy to remove "data speed restrictions when contacted in emergency situations," but this did not happen during the wildfires.
To lift the throttling, instead, Verizon told the department to upgrade to a more expensive plan.




Spoiler alert: We don’t know.
How to prepare for a career in machine learning and artificial intelligence
I heard an interesting stat recently: Approximately 70% of deep learning or AI practitioners today are still in school. Because this is an emerging technology, and it's pulling in people from all sorts of disciplines, we don't really have a great precedent for it yet.
Truth is, a majority of good practitioners in the space today are either self-taught, or they're coming from a different domain entirely (i.e. not just computer science or programming). A solid background in statistics and traditional mathematics is always helpful — experience in a research area is also a big plus.




Dilbert talk directly to my Architecture class.



No comments: