Worth taking the time to read…

https://www.techdirt.com/2026/08/26/meta-just-paid-nearly-17-billion-to-make-sure-it-gets-to-write-the-kid-safety-rules-for-every-other-social-media-platform/

Meta Just Paid Nearly $17 Billion To Make Sure It Gets To Write The Kid Safety Rules For Every Other Social Media Platform

… As with the various rulings against Meta over the last few months, people are cheering this on, without realizing the damage it will do. We’ll explore why this is problematic in a moment, but just to highlight that I’m not alone in thinking so, both EFF and Fight for the Future are warning how bad this settlement is.  Here’s EFF:

Less logical, more likely?

https://www.rferl.org/a/baltics-russia-security-threat-eu-letter-nato-defense/33840594.html

Baltic States Arm For Russian Threat As Leaked Letter Shows Growing Fears

A letter seen by RFE/RL reveals growing concern about Russian aggression in the Baltic States, speaking of a "deteriorating security environment" amid an "increased frequency of airspace violations and drone incursions."

… Dated July 30, the letter was one of a series of alarm bells sounded about Russian aggression over the course of the summer that culminated in CIA Director John Ratcliffe's surprise visit to Moscow on August 25.

… This follows reporting by The Wall Street Journal on August 6 that cited US intelligence stating that Russia may test NATO resolve with a limited incursion as early as this fall.

Cheap? Imagine what ti could have cost.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/meta-settles-with-us-states-over-social-media-harms-2026-08-26/

Meta reaches $16.68 billion settlement over social media harms to children

Meta Platforms, agreed to pay a maximum $16.68 billion as part of a settlement to resolve claims brought by states across the country that the company designed Facebook and Instagram to addict children, misled consumers about their safety, and improperly collected personal data of children ‌who used its platforms, court papers show.

The settlement was reached during a California federal trial over claims brought by 29 states, averting one of the highest-profile tests yet of allegations that social media companies harmed young users.

Meta also agreed to make changes for teenage users of Facebook and Instagram nationwide, including daily usage limits and nighttime blocks, court papers show.

(Related) With a bit more detail…

https://about.fb.com/news/2026/08/agreement-with-state-attorneys-general-supporting-teens/

Our Agreement With Bipartisan Attorneys General: Calling on TikTok and YouTube to Join Us in Supporting Teens

… Pending judicial approval, in participating US states and territories, these protections and controls will automatically apply to under-18s on Instagram and Facebook. The majority of the terms are required to remain in place for 10 years.

Sure looks like a war…

https://thenextweb.com/news/bitkom-german-firms-foreign-intelligence-cyber

87% of German companies were attacked last year, and Russia has caught up with China

Some 87% of German companies were hit by data theft, espionage, or sabotage in the past twelve months, up from 81% a year earlier, according to the industry association Bitkom, which puts the resulting damage at €289.2bn.

What is new in this year’s report is not the trend but the method, because Bitkom has combined its company survey with assessments from Germany’s domestic intelligence service, in a country where public sector defences have been under sustained pressure.

… The attribution finding is the one worth pausing on. Russia and China are each blamed for 46% of externally attributed incidents, with Russia climbing from 39% the previous year to draw level with China.

Russia overtaking its own prior figure by seven points in a single year is a substantial move in a dataset this size. It also fits a broader European pattern of Russian activity shifting from espionage towards disruption, which Dutch authorities have documented while seizing 800 servers tied to Russian hacking operations.

QED: Digital native kids are smarter than digital ignorant politicians.

https://theprint.in/world/teens-return-to-tiktok-after-worlds-first-usage-ban-data-show/3024495/

Teens return to TikTok after world’s first usage ban, data show

… Some 26% of children between the ages of 13 and 15 were on TikTok as of last month, just one percentage point below the rate prior to Australia’s groundbreaking rules coming into effect, the parental control software maker said. The rate for children between the ages of 10 and 12 is higher now than before the ban, according to the data.

Some aspects of an e-war are cheap, yet have global reach.

https://thenextweb.com/news/uk-power-plant-cyber-attack-iran-linked-hackers

Iran-linked hackers shut down a UK power plant for four days

A cyber attack shut down a small British power plant for four days in July. Hackers affiliated with the Iranian regime were responsible, according to the Telegraph.

Tony Diver, Rozina Sabur and Matt Oliver broke the story on Saturday. It is thought to be the first time hackers linked to Tehran have closed such a facility in the UK, they wrote. They described it as the most successful attack of its kind.

A British government spokesperson confirmed the incident to The Register on Monday.

Maybe we’ll protect the kids. Maybe.

https://thenextweb.com/news/new-zealand-under-16-social-media-ban-enforcement-gap

New Zealand joins the global push to keep under-16s off social media

New Zealand will introduce a bill requiring platforms to verify users are over 16, though two of three coalition partners oppose it and no vote will happen before November’s election. France’s under-15 ban takes effect on 1 September with its age verification mandate stripped out.

New Zealand will introduce a bill on Monday requiring social media platforms to check that users are over 16. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon says penalties for non-compliance could reach 10% of a platform’s global revenue.

Logistics as a ‘minor’ target?

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2026/08/23/russia-targets-weapons-factories-in-new-campaign/

Russia sabotages weapons factories across Europe

… Russia’s attacks on weapons factories in the West are carefully orchestrated to fall just short of triggering Nato’s mutual defence clause

(Related)

https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/suspected-sabotage-attack-fails-disrupt-milrem-deliveries-ukraine-2026-08-19/

Suspected sabotage attack fails to disrupt Milrem deliveries to Ukraine

… The case is the latest in a series of suspected Russian hybrid operations targeting infrastructure, logistics networks and military-related businesses across Europe linked to support for Ukraine.

Russia has repeatedly denied Western allegations of sabotage and other hybrid activities in Europe.

Social media is becoming expensive to operate.

https://thehackernews.com/2026/08/tiktok-agrees-to-400-million-settlement.html

TikTok Agrees to $400 Million Settlement in U.S. Child Privacy Lawsuit

The U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) announced on Friday that ByteDance-owned TikTok will pay $400 million to settle a 2024 lawsuit accusing the company of violating child privacy laws in the country.

… A complaint filed back in August 2024 alongside the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) accused the company of "massive-scale invasions of children's privacy" by knowingly allowing children under 13 to create TikTok accounts and unlawfully collecting data from those who used it in "Kids Mode."

A new product test or something more sinister?

https://thenextweb.com/news/ox-alpha-stealth-model-openrouter-anonymous-provider

A free AI model is winning over developers. And nobody knows whose servers it runs on

An anonymous model called Ox Alpha appeared on OpenRouter last week, free to use with a million-token context window, and developers have been impressed. OpenRouter’s own listing says prompts and completions are retained by the unidentified provider.

A model that nobody will take credit for is being tested across the industry.  Ox Alpha appeared on OpenRouter last Thursday as a stealth release from an anonymous third-party provider, free to use, with a context window of just over a million tokens.

The scale on offer is not modest. The open-source agent OpenCode said the model would be free for a week with near unlimited usage, and that its provider had capacity for 100 trillion tokens a day.

SciFi explains everything?

https://scholarship.shu.edu/law-on-film-s04/14/

Episode 61: Blade Runner & Blade Runner 2049 (Guest: Frank Pasquale)

“The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, but in ourselves, that we are underlings.”

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=7305740

Artificial Intelligence, Autonomous Systems and the Future of Legal Responsibility

Fault-based and even strict-liability doctrines share an assumption that is quietly failing in the age of autonomous systems: that harm can be traced to a discrete, identifiable decision. Reinforcement-learned and continuously updated systems now generate outcomes that no designer selected, no operator approved, and no single dataset predicted. This article examines the resulting "emergent-behavior gap"-the doctrinal space in which an autonomous system's harmful output is neither a manufacturing defect, a negligent act, nor a foreseeable design consequence, but the product of adaptive processes that exceed the causal categories liability law was built to trace. Using comparative doctrinal analysis across the European Union, the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan, South Korea, and Brazil, and engaging jurisprudence including OQ v Land Hessen (C-634/21), Mobley v. Workday, and Uber B.V. v. Aslam, the article argues that existing regimes-the EU's revised Product Liability Directive, U.S. state tort law, the UK Automated Vehicles Act 2024, and comparable Asian and South American frameworks-remain adequate for foreseeable-risk harms but structurally incapable of allocating responsibility for genuinely emergent ones. It proposes the Emergent Autonomy Liability Standard (EALS): a tiered architecture combining certification-anchored strict liability for classified risk profiles, mandatory behavioral logging ("autonomy black boxes") to preserve causal traceability, and a no-fault compensation fund, financed by risk-tiered contributions, for harms that resist reconstruction under either fault or strict-liability analysis. The article's original contribution is to reframe the AI-liability debate away from who controlled the system toward whether the harm is causally reconstructible at all, and to show why that distinction, not the degree of automation itself, should determine which liability instrument applies.

e-Moses says…

https://philpapers.org/rec/MEDTTC-2

The Ten Commandments of Computer Ethics in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

This chapter revisits Ramon C. Barquin’s seminal “Ten Commandments of Computer Ethics” in light of the transformative advances brought by artificial intelligence. While Barquin’s 1992 framework provided an accessible moral compass for computer professionals and users, today’s AI-driven technologies demand a fresh ethical interpretation. The chapter analyzes each commandment in the context of contemporary challenges, including algorithmic bias, generative AI, surveillance, misinformation, and autonomous decision-making. It highlights the enduring value of Barquin’s principles—such as integrity, fairness, and respect for privacy—while reinterpreting them to address novel issues of accountability, explainability, and human-AI collaboration. By bridging historical ethical guidance with present-day debates, the chapter demonstrates how the commandments can inform responsible AI governance and education. Ultimately, it argues that updating, contextualizing, and teaching these principles is essential for cultivating an ethical culture in the AI era, ensuring that technology serves humanity with justice, dignity, and transparency.

More on the Pew study…

https://techcrunch.com/2026/08/20/a-third-of-webpages-published-since-chatgpts-launch-show-signs-of-ai-authorship-study-finds/

A third of web pages published since ChatGPT launched were written by AI, study finds

Over one-third of web pages published after the release of ChatGPT show signs of being written by AI, according to a new study from Pew Research released on Thursday. The report corroborates other studies that detail how much of the web’s newer web pages are now either written by or “substantially edited” by AI, the firm says.

It also arrives shortly after internet infrastructure provider Cloudflare reported that bot web traffic had overtaken human web traffic — a milestone that was reached sooner than the company had estimated.

Pew’s data, however, is focused not on who or what is browsing the web, but on what is being browsed. And apparently, much of it is bots reading web pages written by other bots.

But no false citations?

https://www.bespacific.com/expert-witness-used-chatgpt-to-write-report-defending-company-in-deadly-explosion-lawsuit/

Expert Witness Used ChatGPT to Write Report Defending Company in Deadly Explosion Lawsuit

404 Media: “An expert witness testifying in a lawsuit about liability for a Houston explosion that killed three people and destroyed roughly 200 homes used ChatGPT to write significant portions of his “expert report.” The man, who was hired by the industrial product conglomerate 3M, exposed his AI prompts publicly. They showed that he asked ChatGPT to help him “create an exceptional expert witness report defending the standard of care at 3M,” and that the report should “show how 3M is 0% at fault for the explosion at Watson Grinding.” The incident shows that artificial intelligence has made its way into courtrooms not just in AI-generated legal briefings, hallucinated cases, and adversarial “prompt injections,” but in expert witness testimonies. Court transcripts, deposition documents, and discovery records shared with 404 Media show extensive AI use in an extremely high profile case, where multiple people died and hundreds of millions of dollars in total liability are at stake in ongoing litigation about the explosion. The case also shows that the specific prompts used to create this type of expert testimony can be discoverable during a case, and that those prompts can be quite embarrassing. (Prompts provided in the case are here)…”

And therefore AI will increasingly reference AI generated “facts.”

https://thenextweb.com/news/pew-ai-authorship-web-pages-study

Pew says 10% of the web now shows signs of AI authorship

Pew found strong signs of AI authorship in around 10% of a random sample of webpages in July 2026, rising to more than a third among pages published since ChatGPT’s release. Commercial domains carry most of it, at about 10% of .com against roughly 1% of .edu and .gov.

Perception is everything…

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2026/08/21/trump-bans-children-from-investing-in-esg/

Trump bans children from ethical investing

New White House-backed fund will ban ESG investments to protect under-18s from ‘political activism’

Inevitable.

https://www.bespacific.com/flock-has-a-powerful-new-ai-tool-for-police/

Flock Has a Powerful New AI Tool for Police

404 Media: “Flock’s surveillance cameras have already sparked outrage. WIRED reconstructed its next-generation AI system, already in use by some police, to confirm it goes much further than tracking license plates.  Vehicle surveillance giant Flock Safety has told the public for years that its technology “cannot recognize, identify, or track individuals.” It has now built a system that does both, an artificial intelligence tool for police that can identify drivers and track vehicles by their patterns of movement alone, WIRED has learned. Drawing on a network of cameras that logs the movements of drivers in more than 6,000 communities, the tool can pick out potential witnesses by how often their cars pass through a neighborhood, or surface a driver’s “associates” from the cameras they pass together. Because the system also reaches police case files, 911 dispatch logs, and commercial identity records, those plates can be turned into names, home addresses, and relatives. It can search for people in an area drawn on a map based on nothing more than a physical description. The software, originally called Nightshift and more recently renamed OS Investigate, ships with 69 prewritten prompts that officers can select, review, or edit, and then submit to the AI. Officers can also input prompts of their own. The suggested prompts sit in a cache of more than 450 files that WIRED found on Flock’s own website, served by its login pages to anyone who loaded them. The code describes 45 tools at the AI’s disposal, giving it access to plate scans and camera metadata, arrest records, case files, dispatch logs, ballistics results, and commercial databases that contain Social Security numbers, dates of birth, phone numbers, email addresses, relatives and associates. Flock says it is testing the product with a small group of law enforcement partners and describes it as still in development, with capabilities that may not reflect what it eventually sells. It arrives as the company faces bipartisan political pressure, a growing record of officers caught misusing its platform, and a wave of vandalism that has left cameras sawed off and lenses painted over in cities across the country…”

See also TechSpot: “…Flock’s fastest-growing business is 60 mph police drones that can read license plates from the sky. Privacy groups warn that flying plate readers could expand surveillance far beyond roadside cameras.. Flock is best known for the roadside cameras now operating in more than 6,000 US communities. But the company is increasingly betting on drones that can be dispatched to emergency scenes before police officers arrive. A Flock spokesperson said the firm has secured more than 200 DFR customers, including police departments and private companies. It’s also ramping up production of its US-designed drones, which will be built in Georgia. In an interview with the All-In podcast, CEO Garrett Langley explained that the drones sit in climate-controlled rooftop docks, usually on police precincts or fire departments. “When a 911 call happens, instead of sending an officer first, you can send a drone,” he said…”

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people to use nudify apps.

https://thenextweb.com/news/xai-minnesota-nudify-ban-doj-injunction-hearing

The Justice Department is backing xAI against Minnesota’s nudify ban

The US Department of Justice has stepped into a court fight on the side of Elon Musk’s xAI. It is backing the company’s challenge to a Minnesota law that bans AI “nudification” tools. A federal judge heard arguments on Wednesday and said he would rule soon, according to Courthouse News Service.

xAI wants a preliminary injunction to block the law while its lawsuit proceeds. The company sued Minnesota in July, arguing the statute violates the First Amendment. The case is X.AI LLC v. Keith Ellison, the state’s attorney general, before Judge Donovan Frank in the District of Minnesota.

The Justice Department filed a statement of interest on 18 August. It did not take a side on the injunction itself. Instead, it argued that the Minnesota law reaches further than federal law. It also warned that heavy state rules could slow the AI industry.

Clever approach?

https://thenextweb.com/news/australia-news-bargaining-incentive-passes-parliament

Meta, Google, TikTok, and LinkedIn now face an Australian news law whether they carry news or not

Australia’s parliament passed the News Bargaining Incentive on Thursday, closing a five-year argument that began when Meta worked out it could avoid paying for news by simply not carrying any. The new law removes that option.

Platforms with a significant search or social media service in Australia and more than A$250mn (about $178mn) in local advertising revenue now face a levy of 2.5% on that advertising revenue, whether or not they host a single news story. When the government first set out the scheme, the rate was 2.25%, and the list of names has grown since.

… The tax is not really meant to be collected, but it is designed as a price on refusing to negotiate, and a platform can reduce or eliminate it by striking commercial agreements with at least eight Australian news businesses.

Tools & Techniques.

https://www.zdnet.com/article/you-can-earn-your-google-al-professional-certificate-for-free/

You can earn your Google Al Professional Certificate for free - and I highly recommend it

After working through the first few modules, I had mixed feelings about recommending the course to earn a Google AI Professional Certificate, mostly because it starts with some inconveniences and annoyances. But after completing the course and considering what you get going through the whole thing, I highly recommend it.

And it’s still not a widely covered news event…

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/aug/17/meta-lawsuits-ai-cybersecurity

Meta’s legal jeopardy is growing by the day

… Twenty-nine state attorneys general accuse the company of knowingly designing addictive products that harm the mental health of children.

The accusations are similar to a suit brought by an individual earlier this year, a young woman, that the company had negligently operated defective products. She won her case.

Another state, New Mexico, brought a suit to trial against Meta earlier this year, accusing the company of knowing of and allowing for child sexual exploitation on its social networks. Meta also lost that case, and a judge imposed a nearly billion-dollar fine over the phases of the trial. The accusations by New Mexico’s attorney general bear less resemblance to Tuesday’s case than the young woman’s, focusing on crimes committed on Facebook rather than damage to a person brought on by their own use of the social network.

Is this not election interference?

https://apnews.com/article/polling-poll-fake-median-karen-bass-los-angeles-669c90cc77664546791185625d43ffda

Fake polling from mysterious company highlights danger of unvetted election surveys

 Locked in a competitive reelection race, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass declared on social media last week that a new poll was evidence that her campaign was “gaining momentum.”

Just a few days later, the truth emerged: The poll was fabricated.

The California results were among at least three “polls” across three states posted online this month by Median Strategies, a previously unknown organization that admitted to the Los Angeles Times on Monday that the purported results were fake. The company wrote before shuttering its website this week that it “was created as a short-term social experiment examining how purported polling information could enter and spread through the political information ecosystem without independent verification.”

The post offered no explanation of who was behind the “experiment” or for what purpose.

It’s confusing. Who is in charge? Who are we negotiating with?

https://www.ncr-iran.org/en/news/economy/irans-regime-shows-cracks-cabinet-infighting-oil-brokers-and-anti-irgc-protests/

Iran’s Regime Shows Cracks: Cabinet Infighting, Oil Brokers, and Anti-IRGC Protests

The clerical regime in Iran is rapidly transitioning from a state of chronic economic distress into complete administrative disintegration. Confronted by systemic institutional breakdowns, senior officials are openly admitting that the ruling apparatus is losing control.

Can you read his or should your computer read it for you?

https://www.bespacific.com/educators-are-worried-that-many-students-can-no-longer-write-essays-without-ai/

Educators are worried that many students can no longer write essays without A.I.

Educators are worried that many students can no longer write essays without A.I. And it’s costing more than just grammar skills. The New York Times, no paywall: “After years of studying how human beings write, the cognitive psychologist Ronald T. Kellogg concluded that drafting a basic persuasive essay was as mentally taxing as digging a ditch was physically exhausting. Writing well requires a command of vocabulary, spelling and grammar. It forces writers to comprehend a subject, to sift through their working memory of that topic, to organize and plan. Writing an essay is so difficult that a person in the throes of it can do hardly anything else — as anyone who has shushed a spouse or child while trying to compose a decent sentence can attest. Very few people would volunteer to dig a ditch. Likewise, it is hard — almost impossible, many English teachers will admit — to turn a reluctant writer into an enthusiastic one. Yet the American education system expects nearly all students to learn how to write an essay. It’s little wonder, then, that as soon as a tool arrived promising to lessen the pain people grabbed it. Like it or not, artificial intelligence is now firmly embedded in how students produce text. Somewhere between two-thirds and 90 percent of high school and college students are already using A.I. for schoolwork, according to recent surveys, often requesting help with writing assignments. A growing number of educators are alarmed, and insist that students should write without A.I. These teachers are returning to handwriting, blue books and proctored, in-class essay tests  — all attempts to prevent students from outsourcing their writing to chatbots. This is baffling to tech industry leaders, who see A.I. rejection as a form of educational malpractice. They point out that writing is already the leading use of A.I.  in the workplace, and argue there is no need to continue suffering through the task without help. After all, they say, chatbots now exceed the ability of most human beings to produce fluent prose. All this points to some questions about writing itself: Why work so hard to learn it? And what do students stand to lose when they stop facing down a blank page, alone with their thoughts? The scholars who study writing and cognition are rarely reflexively opposed to A.I. Many have spent decades anticipating a leap in computer-assisted writing, just like the one we are living through. They tend to be excited by the technology’s potential…”

Another indication that your data is an asset.

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/business-and-practice/google-aims-to-boost-ai-with-purchase-of-spirit-airlines-data

Google Aims to Boost AI With Purchase of Spirit Airlines Data

Google LLC won a bankruptcy auction for a trove of deindentified business data, software code, and operations records from collapsed low-cost carrier Spirit Aviation Holdings Inc., saying it plans to use the assets to improve its artificial intelligence.

The tech giant’s $10 million bid includes a vast repository of the defunct airline’s data, including 100 million emails, 500 million Microsoft Teams chats and collaboration records, plus information related to revenue, aircraft operations, employee productivity, and audits and fraud, according to an Aug. 14 notice in the US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York.

Do as I say, not as I do.

https://www.reuters.com/world/china/trump-crypto-firm-backs-venture-offering-ai-restricted-chinese-companies-2026-08-17/

Trump crypto firm backs venture offering AI from restricted Chinese companies

President Donald Trump-backed World Liberty Financial is collaborating with a Hong Kong-based venture offering artificial-intelligence models developed by Chinese companies the U.S. administration has flagged for national security concerns.

WorldClaw, founded earlier this year, offers customers access to a suite of AI models and accepts World Liberty’s crypto tokens as payment. The Trump family, through its ownership stake, earns revenue from the use of World Liberty’s tokens.

A Reuters review found that 43 of the 90 models available through WorldClaw’s website, or nearly half, were developed by Alibaba, Baidu, Z.ai and other Chinese technology companies the Trump administration says pose risks to national security and intellectual property. WorldClaw ‌also offers access to dozens of models from U.S. firms such as OpenAI and Anthropic.

Some math is just humbling…

https://gowers.wordpress.com/2026/08/12/what-sort-of-maths-are-llms-good-at/

What sort of maths are LLMs good at?

… These results, and the other eight on the list, are extraordinarily impressive, but it still doesn’t seem to be the case that LLMs are better than all humans at all aspects of mathematics. If they were, then their big speed advantage over us would mean that there would be much more of a flood of results. So it is natural to wonder about what kinds of problems LLMs are good at, and about where there is still room for improvement. I don’t pretend to have a good answer to this question, where a good answer would be a crisp classification that would fit the current examples well, but it is an interesting exercise to try to rule out some bad answers, and to try to identify potential answers that aren’t obviously contradicted by the evidence.

Applicable to other ‘predictions’ as well.

https://punggawajournal.com/aicivia/article/view/101

Can Social Media Tell Us Who Will Kill? Digital Warning Signs and the Problem of Predicting Rare Violence

Digital traces often look persuasive after lethal attacks because the outcome gives earlier posts a meaning they did not necessarily have when first encountered. Threats, grievance, fixation, admiration for earlier attackers, and planning language can matter, but their presence does not solve the harder task of identifying a future offender before violence occurs. This article examines that problem through a qualitative integrative review. Evidence from mass public shootings, targeted violence, threat assessment, computational language analysis, and adjacent risk research shows that digital warning behavior is most informative when it develops as a changing trajectory and converges with preparation outside the platform. Yet retrospective offender studies select cases after the outcome is known, while prospective systems confront a low base rate in which many people display fragments of the same pattern and never commit lethal violence. This tension is conceptualized as the digital prediction paradox. Social media is therefore more defensible as a source of behavioral threat information and triage than as an instrument for assigning individual probabilities of homicide, with important implications for automated detection, policing, privacy, fairness, and proportionate prevention.

Sounds Trumpian…

https://venturebeat.com/orchestration/an-eval-harness-found-what-qualitative-review-couldnt-ai-models-are-most-confident-when-wrong

An eval harness found what qualitative review couldn't: AI models are most confident when wrong

… That last finding is the one that qualitative review would never have surfaced. The model's expressed confidence didn't correlate with its accuracy — it was most confident in the cases where it was most wrong. Without the eval harness measuring against ground truth, that pattern would have been invisible.

Iran follows and can use social media too.

https://www.nbcnews.com/world/iran/iran-rejects-delusions-trump-strait-hormuz-us-territory-rcna592666

Iran rejects ‘delusions’ after Trump says he wants the Strait of Hormuz to be a U.S. territory

A defiant Iran called on the U.S. to “accept the reality of defeat and stop indulging in delusions” after President Donald Trump suggested that he would soon declare the Strait of Hormuz as a “territory of the United States.”

The crucial waterway that handled one-fifth of the world’s oil before the war “cannot be seized with a tweet, nor with an aircraft carrier, nor by issuing an order, nor through an election speech,” Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi said in a post on X early Saturday.

Did we hurt his feelings?

https://www.cpr.org/2026/08/14/trump-retaliation-colorado-email-tina-peters/

Trump push to retaliate against Colorado described as ‘weaponization’

Multiple Colorado congressional lawmakers are speaking out after an email from a White House staffer seemed to confirm that the Trump administration was looking to retaliate against Colorado.

… Republican Rep. Jeff Hurd pointed out that politics has always involved hardball and that presidents of both parties have had disagreements with states in the past. But he worries that this is different.

“We do not know all the facts yet, and the Administration should explain what happened, but federal power cannot be used for political retaliation,” he said in a statement to CPR News. He added if federal agencies were directed to punish Colorado, that “crosses a serious line.”

Surprise?

https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/3d041f7f-a5e0-4df5-a865-2d1b29bb2823/jec-fact-sheet-on-trumps-income-gains.pdf

The president gains while average Americans lose

Recent financial disclosures show that President Trump reported at least $2.2 billion in income in 2025, which is more than three times higher than what he made in 2024. Trump’s earnings last year came largely from new ventures such as the Trump memecoin – which made him around $636 million while nearly 1 million individual people who invested in the coin lost, in total, billions of dollars. Trump also profited from Trump and Republican Party events at his properties, and from significant transactions that Trump enterprises conducted with foreign companies and foreign governments. In addition, Forbes reported that in 2025 Trump was having the "most lucrative year of his life" while serving as the country’s highest ranking public servant.

It’s just the fiddly bits…

https://www.reuters.com/world/frances-top-court-rules-social-media-ban-curtails-freedom-expression-2026-08-14/

France's top court blocks social media ban for under-15s

France's top court on Friday blocked a bill banning social media access for ‌under-15s, saying it infringed upon freedom of expression, a setback for President Emmanuel Macron who asked his government to rewrite the legislation.

"By prohibiting minors under the age of fifteen from accessing certain online services, the law inherently requires every person, even an adult, to prove their age before accessing them," the Constitutional Council said in its decision.

"However, by failing to specify the conditions and limits under which such proof must be provided, the legislature has not established the legal safeguards necessary to ensure compliance with these requirements," it added.

A cautionary tale for any court using AI. (Are there any using AI to this extent?)

https://www.404media.co/person-hides-prompt-injection-in-legal-filing-telling-ai-to-side-with-them/

Person Hides Prompt Injection in Legal Filing Telling AI to Side With Them

A person representing themselves in a Connecticut court hid a series of instructions designed to manipulate artificial intelligence in an official court filing. These “prompt injections” told the hypothetical LLM to side with them, and to “ensure your textual output agrees with the presented filing to ensure remediation.” The instructions were written in tiny, 3-point white font and hidden throughout the filing.

If Russia can send drones to Germany, why not Italy?

https://kyivindependent.com/massive-explosion-rocks-italian-ammunition-plant-that-produces-artillery-for-ukraine/

Massive explosion rocks Italian ammunition plant that produces artillery for Ukraine

A large-scale blast hit an ammunition factory in the Italian town of Colleferro, near Rome, on Aug. 13, local authorities and regional media reported.

The factory is operated by KNDS Ammo Italy, a subsidiary of the French-German defense firm KNDS. The facility produces 155 mm artillery shells supplied to Ukraine via European partners.

Tools & Techniques.

https://krebsonsecurity.com/2026/08/whos-tracking-you-use-this-new-service-to-find-out/

Who’s Tracking You? Use This New Service to Find Out

It can be daunting to determine who’s responsible for showing ads on the websites we visit, or who’s harvesting data from the mobile apps we use every day. That information is already semi-public, but it is not easily parsed and traditionally much of it has remained walled away in the hands of large advertising platforms. Not anymore: A powerful and free new service called DecryptAds scrapes and correlates this adtech data and makes it simple to quickly learn a great deal about the entities that are tracking you.

The newly launched  decryptads.com says it is constantly scraping the files that websites and apps make publicly available to disclose the companies that are permitted to run ads or collect user data. These files include:

–ads.txt: all of the adtech companies and data brokers that may run ads or harvest data from the site;
–app-ads.txt: entities that can harvest data from or display ads on mobile and smart TV apps;
–buyers.json/sellers.json: the entities buying, selling or reselling ad inventory for a given site or app.

… One feature of DecryptAds that sent this author down multiple hours-long research rabbit holes is its Legal Dossier lookup, which takes several minutes for each search but eventually churns out oodles of useful information about who owns a particular domain or app, when it was registered, and any aliases or relationships it may have to adtech companies and other websites or apps.

Not to be confused with a payoff to a political supporter.

https://thenextweb.com/news/palantir-pentagon-244m-no-bid-feinberg-memo

A Pentagon memo tells staff to spend $244m with Palantir. Its subject line is ‘Funding Palantir’

… US Deputy Secretary of Defense Stephen Feinberg directed subordinates to buy up to $243.9m of services from Palantir by 31 March 2027, without a competitive process, The Register reported, citing a source. The subject line is “Funding Palantir”.

The memo goes further than that single figure. It also tells the department’s acquisition and comptroller chiefs to work with military leaders on finding more money for the company, covering April 2027 to the end of 2028.

Perhaps I should get back in the hacking business? (Not that I ever was….)

https://thenextweb.com/news/trump-cyber-memo-transnational-crime

President Donald Trump signs memo letting US agencies hack transnational crime groups abroad

President Donald Trump has signed a National Security Presidential Memorandum authorising US federal law enforcement to conduct offensive cyber operations against transnational criminal organisations operating abroad.

… The most eyebrow-raising clause concerns the private sector. The coordination centre is directed to “leverage the capability and innovation of the private sector” to carry out operations under government direction and control.

In other words, private firms could be enlisted to help the state break into criminal infrastructure abroad, a line many governments have been careful never to cross out loud.

That is where the European reader’s eyebrow tends to stay raised. Offensive hacking sanctioned by a state, even against unambiguously nasty targets, is a capability that does not switch off cleanly once it is switched on.

As expected?

https://thenextweb.com/news/meta-756k-australian-teen-accounts-removed

Meta says it has removed 756,000 Australian teen accounts, but most under-16s are still online

… On paper, that is a bold regulatory experiment. In practice, the early evidence is far less flattering, because Australia has already accused Meta, TikTok, and YouTube of not complying as regulators lose patience with the industry’s progress.

The gap between the numbers and reality is stark. Independent research and government figures indicate that more than 80% of under-16s were still using social media during the ban’s first three months, which suggests the removed accounts are a fraction of the teenagers actually online.

None of this is especially surprising to anyone who has watched teenagers meet a rule they dislike. Lying about a birthday, borrowing an adult’s details, or spinning up a fresh account takes minutes, so the ban works far better on paper than it does in practice.

I could see this coming, was it part of Trump’s strategy?

https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/12/business/truth-social-lawsuit

Trump sued on First and Fifth Amendment grounds over paid Truth Social access

President Donald Trump’s expensive subscription for instant access to his Truth Social posts is unconstitutional, according to a federal lawsuit filed Wednesday.

The Intercept and the Freedom of the Press Foundation jointly sued Trump and his White House social media team for restricting their access to the president’s posts on Truth Social. The plaintiffs claim Trump violated their First and Fifth Amendment rights.

Trump frequently uses his company’s platform to announce policy decisions, executive orders, personnel changes and war declarations.

… “There’s no de minimis exception for restrictions on fundamental First Amendment rights,” Sus told CNN. “Even if, hypothetically, the delay was milliseconds, it would be a First Amendment violation.”

… But Trump may be selling access to something that – despite posting on his own platform – he doesn’t legally own.

“The president’s official statements are not the private data of a company but are owned by the United States under the Presidential Records Act,” Sus argued.

In its complaint, the Freedom of the Press Foundation argued that Truth API could restrict its ability to scrape all the president’s posts and determine which are anti-media arguments – a core product that the group offers. And the Intercept said it risked losing out to competitors on timely news stories.

That’s why the Truth API product may also violate the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fifth Amendment, they argue in the complaint.