...and
yet I can’t prove that my vote was recorded correctly, or at
all. Funny that.
https://www.bespacific.com/the-november-3rd-election-was-the-most-secure-in-american-history/
The
November 3rd election was the most secure in American history
Wider
jurisdiction and wider scope of defamation?
https://techcrunch.com/2020/11/12/facebook-loses-final-appeal-in-defamation-takedown-case-must-remove-same-and-similar-hate-posts-globally/
Facebook
loses final appeal in defamation takedown case, must remove same and
similar hate posts globally
Austria’s
Supreme Court has dismissed Facebook’s appeal in a long running
speech takedown case — ruling it must remove references to
defamatory comments made about a local politician worldwide
for as long as the injunction lasts. [Does
it then have to put them back? Bob]
… Questions
were referred
up to
the EU’s Court of Justice. And in a key judgement last
year the
CJEU decided platforms can be instructed to hunt for and remove
illegal speech worldwide without falling foul of European rules that
preclude platforms from being saddled with a “general content
monitoring obligation”. Today’s
Austrian Supreme Court ruling flows naturally from that.
Austrian
newspaper Der
Standard reports
that the court confirmed the injunction applies
worldwide, both to identical postings or those
that carry the same essential meaning as the original defamatory
posting.
[So,
would this article have to be suppressed? How about if I posted it
in place of the original? Bob]
Also
more work from home. What will that tracking show?
https://onezero.medium.com/welcome-back-to-the-office-please-wear-this-tracking-device-98747a66750f
Welcome
Back to the Office. Please Wear This Tracking Device
A
boom in contact tracing devices could herald a new era of worker
surveillance
I
doubt anyone has THE answer, yet. Keep trying.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/washington-state-could-be-the-2021-battleground-for-internet-privacy-11605177001
Washington
State Could Be the 2021 Battleground for Internet Privacy
A
senior lawmaker in Washington believes the state can be the next hub
for consumer privacy legislation in the U.S., following California’s
lead. But he faces continued opposition from within his own party
over how it should be enforced.
State
Sen. Reuven Carlyle, a Democrat who chairs the Washington state
Senate’s Environment, Energy & Technology Committee, said he is
evaluating the recently approved California Privacy Rights Act with
an eye toward updating the Washington Privacy Act in the coming weeks
in preparation for the next legislative session beginning in January.
… Similar
to data protections in the CPRA, Mr. Carlyle’s draft
2021 bill would
give residents the right to request companies to delete or correct
their personal data. The proposal would also allow consumers to opt
out of data processing for certain purposes, such as targeted
advertising, and require businesses to conduct data-protection
assessments.
The
key sticking point is enforcement, state officials say, namely
whether to create a private right of action that would allow
individuals to sue companies for alleged violations.
“I
do not support that position in any way,” Mr. Carlyle said, warning
of frivolous lawsuits and citing opposition from the business
community. “I strongly believe state-level [attorney general]
enforcement is the way you can most effectively enforce the bill.”
Some
other state officials, including Attorney General Bob Ferguson, argue
that such a private right of action is crucial.
“Last
year’s data privacy bill was unenforceable,” Mr. Ferguson, a
Democrat, said in a statement. “The bill prohibited individuals
from going to court to protect their rights, and failed to give my
office the tools we need to ensure compliance.”
(Related)
If not an answer, a strong suggestion.
https://www.huntonprivacyblog.com/2020/11/12/european-commission-publishes-draft-of-new-standard-contractual-clauses/
European
Commission Publishes Draft of New Standard Contractual Clauses
On
November 12, 2020, the European Commission published a draft
implementing decision on
standard contractual clauses for the transfer of personal data to
third countries pursuant to the EU General Data Protection Regulation
(“GDPR”) along with its draft set
of new standard contractual clauses (the
“New SCCs”).
Should
be informative.
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/11/introducing-how-fix-internet-new-podcast-eff
Introducing
“How to Fix the Internet,” a New Podcast from EFF
Today
EFF is launching How to Fix the Internet, a new podcast mini-series
to examine potential solutions to six ills facing the modern digital
landscape.
… We
are launching the podcast with two episodes: The
Secret Court Approving Secret Surveillance,
featuring the Cato Institute’s specialist in surveillance legal
policy Julian Sanchez; and Why
Does My Internet Suck?,
featuring Gigi Sohn, one of the nation’s leading advocates for
open, affordable, and democratic communications networks. Future
episodes will be released on Tuesdays.
We’ve
also created a hub page for How
to Fix the Internet.
This
page includes links to all of our episodes, ways to subscribe, and
detailed show notes. In the show notes, we’ve included all the
books mentioned in each podcast, as well as substantial legal
resources—including key opinions in the cases we talk about, briefs
filed by EFF, bios of our guests, and a full transcript of every
episode.
You
can subscribe to How
to Fix the Internet via
RSS.
Stitcher,
TuneIn,
Apple
Podcasts,
Google
Podcasts,
and Spotify
and
through any of the other podcast places.
If
the music companies can do it, the ISPs must also.
https://www.natlawreview.com/article/internet-service-provider-isp-cox-communications-found-liable-to-tune-1-billion
Internet
Service Provider (ISP) Cox Communications Found Liable to the Tune of
$1 Billion For Allowing Users to Illegally Share Music Files on
Peer-to-Peer Networks
Recently, the Eastern District of Virginia upheld
a music piracy jury verdict against the internet service provider Cox
Communications. See Sony Music Ent. v. Cox Commc’ns, Case No.
1:18-cv-950-LO-JFA, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105071 (E.D. Va. June 2,
2020). The jury returned a $1 billion damage award against Cox
Communications who was accused of knowingly allowing subscribers to
share and download infringing songs via peer-to-peer sharing
platforms such as BitTorrent. Holding an internet service provider
liable for the infringing acts of its users, this case sets the stage
for a closely watched appeal.
… The jury found Cox failed to address the
copyright infringement despite receiving information from the
copyright owners about the time, place, and IP addresses responsible
for illegally distributing and reproducing music files over Cox’s
network. The court agreed there was enough evidence to find the
technology used to detect the infringement was reliable, Cox had the
right and ability to supervise the infringement committed by its
subscribers, and Cox gained a financial benefit from the
infringement. There was sufficient basis for the jury to find Cox
liable for vicarious copyright infringement, and because Cox failed
to address the specific notices of infringement, for contributory
infringement as well.
Perspective. I suspect the President’s
insistence that ‘employees’ “do what I want, ignore the facts”
will inform most of the post-presidential investigations of his
business dealings. By the way, Krebs was fired.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-cyber-officials-exclusive-idUSKBN27S2YI
Exclusive:
Top official on U.S. election cybersecurity tells associates he
expects to be fired
Top U.S. cybersecurity official Christopher Krebs,
who worked on protecting the election from hackers but drew the ire
of the Trump White House over efforts to debunk disinformation, has
told associates he expects to be fired, three sources familiar with
the matter told Reuters.