I want one! The school
has a 3D printer, all I need is a good picture of my favorite law
school professor! (ThatsMyFace will turn a couple of photos into a
3D rendering)
If you are not
comfortable with the surveillance cameras, an identity replacement
technology that is basically a Surveillance identity prosthetic
provides you a new face.
If you find all people
around you having the same face like you saw of the agents in Matrix
3, then Leo Selvaggio is the one to thank.
He has designed a
rubber mask with the aim to foil surveillance cameras.
… It is basically a
3D printed resin mask which has been made by using a 3D scan (of
Selvaggio’s face), and has been formulated by Thatsmyface.com.
The mask renders both his skin tone and his features, and provides
quite a realistic look. However the eyes which appears from the eye
holes in the mask look a bit creepy.
You mean it's possible
to get it wrong?
New
on LLRX – Unwarranted DNA Sampling: The Legacy of Maryland v. King
by Sabrina
I. Pacifici on May 11, 2014
“Criminal
law expert Ken
Strutin’s article addresses how DNA forensics is about
information, privacy and the presumption of innocence. It has become
the determinant for identification, solving cold cases and
exonerating the innocent. Strutin describes that at its core, it is
an inestimable library of personal data. Due to the increasingly
important role of Personally identifiable information (PII), courts
and legislatures have been attempting to balance the interests of the
individual in protecting their genetic information with the
usefulness and necessity of that same data for criminal
investigation. Strutin notes clearly that any DNA or forensic
database is a composite of intertwined informational and legal values
that pose competing and conflicting questions about the analytics
(accuracy, reliability and validity) of the data and the lawfulness
(constitutionality) of its gathering. His article collects recent
notable decisions and scholarship appearing in the aftermath of
Maryland v. King.
“Gee, we don't
understand. All of the lobbyists for our big contributors told us
this was the right thing to do...”
Report:
FCC to Revamp Net Neutrality Rules After Backlash
Amidst backlash over
his proposed net neutrality rules, FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler will
reportedly circulate revised rules that spell out what the agency
will and will not accept from broadband providers.
As reported
by The Wall Street Journal, the updated rules specify that
the FCC will review any sort of paid prioritization deals to make
sure they don't unfairly disadvantage other companies.
The draft, an FCC
official told the Journal, will also ask for comment on
whether such paid deals should be banned altogether. Or, if the FCC
should scrap its plan and seek to reclassify broadband as a telecom
service instead of an information service.
No comments:
Post a Comment