Thursday, January 19, 2012


For my Ethical Hackers: May be easier than hacking into each site...
"A new service in the cyber underground aims to be the Google search of underground Web sites, connecting buyers to a vast sea of shops that offer an array of dodgy goods and services, from stolen credit card numbers to identity information and anonymity tools. From the story: 'A glut of data breaches and stolen card numbers has spawned dozens of stores that sell the information. The trouble is that each shop requires users to create accounts and sign in before they can search for cards. Enter MegaSearch, which lets potential buyers discover which fraud shops hold the cards they're looking for without having to first create accounts at each store.'"


TED talk
Mikko Hypponen: Three types of online attack
Cybercrime expert Mikko Hypponen talks us through three types of online attack on our privacy and data -- and only two are considered crimes. "Do we blindly trust any future government? Because any right we give away, we give away for good."


I am not sure there is a reasonable debate on this topic. I am certain this is not a solution.
SOPA, Internet Regulation and the Economics of Piracy
Earlier this month, I detailed at some length why claims about the purported economic harms of piracy, offered by supporters of the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and PROTECT-IP Act (PIPA), ought to be treated with much more skepticism than they generally get from journalists and policymakers.
My own view is that this ought to be rather secondary to the policy discussion: SOPA and PIPA would be ineffective mechanisms for addressing the problem, and a terrible idea for many other reasons, even if the numbers were exactly right. No matter how bad last season’s crops were, witch burnings are a poor policy response. Fortunately, legislators finally seem to be cottoning on to this: SOPA now appears to be on ice for the time being, and PIPA’s own sponsors are having second thoughts about mucking with the Internet’s Domain Name System.
That said, I remain a bit amazed that it’s become an indisputable premise in Washington that there’s an enormous piracy problem, that it’s having a devastating impact on US content industries, and that some kind of aggressive new legislation is needed tout suite to stanch the bleeding. Despite the fact that the Government Accountability Office recently concluded that it is “difficult, if not impossible, to quantify the net effect of counterfeiting and piracy on the economy as a whole,” our legislative class [i.e. those who dictate to common citizens Bob] has somehow determined that—among all the dire challenges now facing the United States—this is an urgent priority. Obviously, there’s quite a lot of copyrighted material circulating on the Internet without authorization, and other things equal, one would like to see less of it.

Khan Academy explains SOPA in a short video...
SOPA and PIPA : What SOPA and PIPA are at face value and what they could end up enabling

(Related) Next, Congress will move to Copyright the Constitution so no citizen can argue that it protects them without paying a “reasonable” fee...
Supreme Court Says Congress May Re-Copyright Public Domain Works
Congress may take books, musical compositions and other works out of the public domain, where they can be freely used and adapted, and grant them copyright status again, the Supreme Court ruled Wednesday.
In a 6-2 ruling, the court said that, just because material enters the public domain, it is not “territory that works may never exit.” (.pdf)
… Writing for the majority, Justice Ruth Ginsburg said “some restriction on expression is the inherent and intended effect of every grant of copyright.” But the top court, with Justice Elena Kagan recused, said Congress’ move to re-copyright the works to comport with an international treaty was more important.
… In dissent, Justices Stephen Breyer and Samuel Alito said the legislation goes against the theory of copyright and “does not encourage anyone to produce a single new work.” Copyright, they noted, was part of the Constitution to promote the arts and sciences.

(Related) Just to be fair, here's another view...
Why I pirate
Why is the United States Congress trying to enact SOPA and PIPA? Because I am a pirate.


It's a long way from “The Emperor's New Clothes” (thank God) but it may be a start...
January 18, 2012
House of Representatives House Launches Transparency Portal
Sunlight Foundation: "Making good on part of the House of Representative's commitment to increase congressional transparency, today the House Clerk's office launched http://docs.house.gov/, a one stop website where the public can access all House bills, amendments, resolutions for floor consideration, and conference reports in XML, as well as information on floor proceedings and more. Information will ultimately [Translation: We should think about planning a future schedule to consider the need to address this, maybe... Bob] be published online in real time and archived for perpetuity. The Clerk is hosting the site, and the information will primarily come from the leadership, the Committee on House Administration, the Rules Committee, and the Clerk's office. The project has been driven by House Republican leaders as part of an push for transparency.


If not perfect, at least it's a start...
January 18, 2012
Google Launches Good to Know Campaign for Internet Safety
"Google’s Good to Know campaign aims to help people stay safe on the Internet and manage the information they share online. The website and ads provide easy to use tips and advice on online security, help on understanding the data users share and tools they can use to manage their data. Written in clear language and featuring practical examples to illustrate complex security and privacy issues, the website and advertising campaign aim to empower users to tackle their online security concerns and make more informed decisions about their internet use. The U.S. campaign includes adverts in newspapers, on public transport and online. Download all print ads – (PDF)."


Clearly, this is where we are heading. Also clear, I don't like it.
Sci-Fi-Infused Videos Show Off Keiichi Matsuda’s Vision of the Future


From a live blog of the Apple education event introducing “iBooks 2”
why books are not good. Not portable, not searchable, not current, not interactive.
Integrating databases into textbooks, being able to search LexisNexus for example inside a textbook could be a very powerful academic tool and has great business potential.
Very interactive. But what if you want to focus on reading text? Going into portrait mode changes layout.
Will be interesting to see what Apple comes up with for citations. With variable layout and text size, pin point citations are a problem - one Amazon is trying to cope with still on Kindle.
In the iBooks store, there's a new textbook category
iBooks 2 is an app you download from app store to iPad. It's free.
But how do you create these books? He says t here's a new application called iBooks Author
There are templates, like math or science books.
We know alot of people have great content already written, he says, so you can drag word files into the system, it scans through, looks at styles, and fills out pages from book.
If you can write code in javascript and html you can create your own interactive widgets.
Students keep textbooks forever. [If the “books” point to sites on the Internet, the textbook can be constantly updated!!! Bob]
Apple turned to many partners to make it great, he says. Pearson, McGraw Hill Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

No comments: